On 16 Sep 2014 04:14, "dE" wrote:
>
> Yeah, I'll try this again.
>
> Thanks for the help. Currently I'm working with CentOS 6.5
>
That's fairly important information to know due to the huge differences in
behaviour.
Your original post stated CentOS 7
_
Hi.
I've found inconstancy between output of repoquery and rpm. I was
looking forward towards apache php 5.4 module which must provided by
some package SCL (can someone tell me?).
rpm -qf /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy.so
httpd-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64
repoquery -qf /etc/httpd/modules/mod_pr
On 09/15/14 23:34, James Hogarth wrote:
On 15 Sep 2014 18:12, "dE" wrote:
Minimal CentOS does not have NetworkManager.
*blink*
I built a minimal (just the minimal package group) CentOS 7 to test this
just for you and I assure you NetworkManager was there. C6 did not have it
in minimal but C
On 2014-09-15, Warren Young wrote:
> On 9/15/2014 13:58, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> zfs release zero dot something does not sound like production ready ?
>
> https://clusterhq.com/blog/state-zfs-on-linux/
That's a super (and timely!) post on XFS. I saw in particular this
section.
"Upgrades requir
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Mon, September 15, 2014 4:49 pm, Andrew Holway wrote:
The SSD and second CPU core are not free.
Where I come from, the streets are paved with SLC
Is it Salt Lake City that you are from? (that is so reach with
Second Level Cache... That is wha
On Mon, September 15, 2014 4:49 pm, Andrew Holway wrote:
>> The SSD and second CPU core are not free.
>>
>
> Where I come from, the streets are paved with SLC
Is it Salt Lake City that you are from? (that is so reach with Second
Level Cache... That is what you actually meant I figure)
Am I the
Am 13.09.2014 16:21, schrieb Michael Kress:
Hi, anybody got wml running under centos7?
Got problems either compiling it or finding an rpm.
TIA for any hint!
Found a solution: installed centos5, there I got it running.
Not the worst thing, it's running on a VM, it's only purpose is to
execute w
> The SSD and second CPU core are not free.
>
Where I come from, the streets are paved with SLC
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 9/15/2014 14:48, Andrew Holway wrote:
Any comparison between ZFS and non-ZFS probably overlooks things like
fully-checksummed data (not just metadata) and redundant copies. ZFS will
always be slower than filesystems without these features. TANSTAAFL.
Not really true. It hugely depends
>
> Any comparison between ZFS and non-ZFS probably overlooks things like
> fully-checksummed data (not just metadata) and redundant copies. ZFS will
> always be slower than filesystems without these features. TANSTAAFL.
Not really true. It hugely depends on your workload. For example, if you
Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2014-09-15 22:51 GMT+03:00 Steve Thompson :
>> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>>
>> It´s called BTRFS.
>>> It´s supported by SUSE, Fujitsu, Oracle, among others.
>>
>> Yeah, but is it supported by the *US Government* ???
>
> zfs release zero dot something does
Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
>> It´s called BTRFS.
>> It´s supported by SUSE, Fujitsu, Oracle, among others.
>
> Yeah, but is it supported by the *US Government* ???
Hey, selinux is
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
On 9/15/2014 13:58, Eero Volotinen wrote:
zfs release zero dot something does not sound like production ready ?
https://clusterhq.com/blog/state-zfs-on-linux/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2014-09-15 22:51 GMT+03:00 Steve Thompson :
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
> It´s called BTRFS.
>> It´s supported by SUSE, Fujitsu, Oracle, among others.
>>
>
> Yeah, but is it supported by the *US Government* ???
zfs release zero dot something does not sound like production re
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Fernando Cassia wrote:
It´s called BTRFS.
It´s supported by SUSE, Fujitsu, Oracle, among others.
Yeah, but is it supported by the *US Government* ???
Steve___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 03:29:31PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Chris wrote:
>
> > Isn't fuse / zfs (partly?) in userspace?
>
>
> I believe there´s two separate efforts to run ZFS on Linux. One uses FUSE,
> the other reimplemented ZFS as a loadable kernel mod
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Miguel Medalha
wrote:
> Zfsonlinux does not work in user space, it is a kernel module. Just try
> it.
There´s a copy-on-write file system in the GPL Linux kernel, merged into
the mainline Linux kernel in January 2009.
http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.p
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Chris wrote:
> Isn't fuse / zfs (partly?) in userspace?
I believe there´s two separate efforts to run ZFS on Linux. One uses FUSE,
the other reimplemented ZFS as a loadable kernel module.
FC
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Ummm, like you've walked on the moon
LOL. I will begin saying that "the US government backs JavaFX" then, just
because NASA uses it in some projects.
https://weblogs.java.net/blog/seanmiphillips/archive/2013/11/20/visualizing-nasa-groun
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Fernando Cassia
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Andrew Holway
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ZFS on Linux is backed by the US government as ZFS will be used as the
>>> primary filesystem to back the parallel distributed filesystem
>>> 'Lustre
On 09/15/2014 08:18 AM, Miguel Medalha wrote:
> That alone is meaningless. MDADM with which filesystem?
ext4
> Zfsonlinux does not work in user space, it is a kernel module. Just try it.
Isn't fuse / zfs (partly?) in userspace?
--
Gruß,
Christian
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Andrew Holway
> wrote:
>
>>
>> ZFS on Linux is backed by the US government as ZFS will be used as the
>> primary filesystem to back the parallel distributed filesystem 'Lustre'.
>
>
> wow, the US government
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Andrew Holway
wrote:
>
> ZFS on Linux is backed by the US government as ZFS will be used as the
> primary filesystem to back the parallel distributed filesystem 'Lustre'.
wow, the US government!!. *sarcasm implied*
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telli
On 15 Sep 2014 18:12, "dE" wrote:
>
>
> Minimal CentOS does not have NetworkManager.
>
*blink*
I built a minimal (just the minimal package group) CentOS 7 to test this
just for you and I assure you NetworkManager was there. C6 did not have it
in minimal but C7 does.
Read the comps file if you w
On 9/15/2014 01:37, Andrew Holway wrote:
To set expectation. Actually, the most recent release (0.63) of ZFS on
Linux is not that quick.
Compared to what? To ZFS on Solaris, ZFS on FreeBSD, or ext4 on Linux?
Any comparison between ZFS and non-ZFS probably overlooks things like
fully-checks
On 09/11/14 13:54, James Hogarth wrote:
On 11 September 2014 05:30, dE wrote:
ifcfg enp0s3 add fc00::1002/124 results in
arping: Unknown host fc00:1002
Error: some host already uses address fc00:1002 on enp0s3.
You know the last error message sounds ridiculous. The virtual interface
on the h
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Web Master <
webmas...@age-concern-cardiff.org.uk> wrote:
> help
>
>
Please visit the URL as pasted below (shows up in the footer of every
mailing list message).
Heck, instructions are also at the top of the message you apparently did
not read closely.
You sent yo
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Sun, September 14, 2014 10:40 pm, Chris wrote:
>> On 09/15/2014 04:02 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> I myself am using ATI usually (even after they were bought out by
>>> AMD).
>>
>> I used to use ATI. Accidentally, the last computers I bought had a
>> NVIDIA card. I heard
On Sun, September 14, 2014 10:40 pm, Chris wrote:
> On 09/15/2014 04:02 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> I myself am using ATI usually (even after they were bought out by
>> AMD).
>
> I used to use ATI. Accidentally, the last computers I bought had a
> NVIDIA card. I heard Linux support of both boards
On 15 September 2014 @08:14 zulu, Samson wrote:
Hi,
i tried to install WPS as alternative to Openffice but it give me this
error below.
Requires: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.14)
That's the same library that prevents Chrome 28 and newer from
installing in C6.x (though you failed to mention wha
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 06:49:45PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Sep 14, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> > Hi! I want to make the default environment for users the
> > environment of devtoolset .. and i am thinking to do it this way:
> > 1. make /bin/bash-devtools with the conte
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Dear All,
when looking at
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
I notice that adobe-Linux repo is no longer listed.
If it no longer exists or it's not recommended, then what is now the
best way to install flash?
Since rpmforge is now in the known problem repositories.
help
-Original Message-
From: centos-requ...@centos.org
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 1:00 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 116, Issue 13
Send CentOS mailing list submissions to
centos@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http:/
Hi,
i tried to install WPS as alternative to Openffice but it give me this
error below.
Requires: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.14)
Kindly advice.
Regards
Samson.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> > Maybe you can tune ZFS further, but I tried it in userspace (with FUSE)
> > and reading was a almost 5 times slower than MDADM.
>
ZFS on Linux is backed by the US government as ZFS will be used as the
primary filesystem to back the parallel distributed filesystem 'Lustre'.
Lustre is used in
On 2014-09-15, Chris wrote:
> On 09/08/2014 09:00 PM, Andrew Holway wrote:
>> Try ZFS http://zfsonlinux.org/
>
> Maybe you can tune ZFS further, but I tried it in userspace (with FUSE)
> and reading was a almost 5 times slower than MDADM.
Just running ZFS in the kernel is going to be a lot faster
37 matches
Mail list logo
