> On Oct 1, 2014, at 22:57, Frank Cox wrote:
> [...]
> Since it has now become amazingly difficult to get a laptop if you're not
> planning to use Windows, at least around here, I'm wondering what the rest of
> you fine folks do when it comes to purchasing a laptop?
For the last few years I'v
Today I found myself in need of a laptop to run Centos on. And that simple
statement led to an all-day odyssey.
My original plan was to purchase a laptop and install Centos 6 on it. I went
to Staples and tried booting it on every model of laptop that they had in the
store. They all come with
Hi folks,
I've just realized that the following package is included in centos7
base, but it's not included in stock EL7. Any ideas why this is?
Seems odd they'd forgotten such a useful package in the upstream distribution!
# rpm -qi cyrus-sasl-sql
Name: cyrus-sasl-sql
Version : 2.1.
On 09/30/2014 03:39 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/29/2014 7:08 PM, g wrote:
i did find a link at gofree.com that lead to videolan.org, which lead
to rpm.pbone.net, where i found binary rpms for fedora and other os's,
but none for centos.
so, it looks like if i want vlc for centos, i will have t
Great recap Akemi.
I guess I am also a bit familiar with this stuff, however, since I haven't had
to worry about "drivers" since moving to linux and not using BSD on the desktop
for quite a few years now.
I asked on NovaLug list first, since I had trouble posting to this list, and
someone poin
On 10/01/2014 02:17 PM, Igal @ getRailo.org wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I've inherited a server with CentOS 6.4
>
> the VNC Server starts up with the OS and its screen resolution is set to
> 800x600.
>
> I found that I can set the resolution by specifying the -geometry
> switch, but I can't find where
On 2014/10/01 14:01, Igal @ getRailo.org wrote:
hi Miranda --
unfortunately I am a total noob in the Linux/CentOS world, so... where
would I find that init.d script if there is one?
thanks,
Igal
On 10/1/2014 4:56 PM, Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote:
On 2014/10/01 11:17, Igal @ getRailo.org wr
hi Miranda --
unfortunately I am a total noob in the Linux/CentOS world, so... where
would I find that init.d script if there is one?
thanks,
Igal
On 10/1/2014 4:56 PM, Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote:
> On 2014/10/01 11:17, Igal @ getRailo.org wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>> I've inherited a server wit
On 2014/10/01 11:17, Igal @ getRailo.org wrote:
hi all,
I've inherited a server with CentOS 6.4
the VNC Server starts up with the OS and its screen resolution is set to
800x600.
I found that I can set the resolution by specifying the -geometry
switch, but I can't find where the call to start t
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Martes
wrote:
> For brevity, here is the output that you requested earlier.
>
> [@imaginationland ~]$ lspci -nn |grep -i eth
> 08:05.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Qualcomm Atheros AR5212/AR5213 Wireless
> Network Adapter [168c:0013] (rev 01)
> 0b:00.0 Ethernet cont
For brevity, here is the output that you requested earlier.
[@imaginationland ~]$ lspci -nn |grep -i eth
08:05.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Qualcomm Atheros AR5212/AR5213 Wireless
Network Adapter [168c:0013] (rev 01)
0b:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL8111
hi all,
I've inherited a server with CentOS 6.4
the VNC Server starts up with the OS and its screen resolution is set to
800x600.
I found that I can set the resolution by specifying the -geometry
switch, but I can't find where the call to start the vncserver is set in
order to change it.
I know
> I don't need to resolve my hostnames outside my private network, so the EUI64
> addresses will be fine. It'll be a pain collecting them, but that's a
> one-time
> job and I can write a script to redo them if needed.
might I suggest "ping6 ff02::1%em0" or whatever interface is appropriate, to
Thanks for the explanation Mark. I will try that when I get home and get on
my test setup. I'll report back with my findings or more inquiries.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Mark Tinberg wrote:
>
> > That's the thing Mark, configuring it is where I'm stuck. I'm unsure of
> > what addresses I'
On 2014-10-01, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> My apologies for being too lazy and not deleting my standard signature
> when posting to the list.
You have nothing for which to apologize; anyone genuinely offended is
overreacting. (I suspect that the responding poster was joking that a
"senior" sysadmi
On Wednesday, October 01, 2014 19:06:11 Mark Tinberg wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 01, 2014 15:23:52 Mark Tinberg wrote:
> > > > All of my servers and
> > > > workstations are able to ping6 to outside targets, and anything with a
> > > > browser installed can open ipv6.google.com.
> > > >
> > > >
On 10/01/2014 03:06 PM, Mark Tinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, October 01, 2014 15:23:52 Mark Tinberg wrote:
All of my servers and
workstations are able to ping6 to outside targets, and anything with a
browser installed can open ipv6.google.com.
So far I have figured out that you have to run TWO in
On Wednesday, October 01, 2014 15:23:52 Mark Tinberg wrote:
> > > All of my servers and
> > > workstations are able to ping6 to outside targets, and anything with a
> > > browser installed can open ipv6.google.com.
> > >
> > > So far I have figured out that you have to run TWO instances of DHCP.
On Wednesday, October 01, 2014 15:23:52 Mark Tinberg wrote:
> > All of my servers and
> > workstations are able to ping6 to outside targets, and anything with a
> > browser installed can open ipv6.google.com.
> >
> > So far I have figured out that you have to run TWO instances of DHCP. One
> > in
On Wed, October 1, 2014 12:45 pm, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>>
>> With the premise being that the 'matching' key to that secret key is,
>> well, public or accessible to anyone.
>
>
>
> Well, yeah! The PUBLIC key that you're sending the message to is
> accessible
> to anyone. But the only way to decrypt t
On Wed, October 1, 2014 12:29 pm, Mike wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, October 1, 2014 11:34 am, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2014 06:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, October 1, 2014 10:19 am, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
>
>
> With the premise being that the 'matching' key to that secret key is,
> well, public or accessible to anyone.
Well, yeah! The PUBLIC key that you're sending the message to is accessible
to anyone. But the only way to decrypt the message is with the PRIVATE key
that is paired with the public
> That's the thing Mark, configuring it is where I'm stuck. I'm unsure of
> what addresses I'm supposed to be using as the prefixes that Hurricane
> Electric gives me for /64 and /48, are different from the tunnel's endpoint
> address. At least I think I'm reading it right from the tunnel's
> info
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, October 1, 2014 11:34 am, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 10/01/2014 06:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, October 1, 2014 10:19 am, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 10/01/2014 05:16 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 10/01/2014 04:58 PM
I recently installed some courier fonts.
I'm not sure whether Firefox will use them.
They are not showing up on Firefoxes font chooser.
Do I need to restart Firefox for them to show up?
How do I discover what font Firefox actually uses for something?
I've found Inspect Element, but I'm pretty sur
On Wed, October 1, 2014 11:34 am, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> On 10/01/2014 06:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, October 1, 2014 10:19 am, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/01/2014 05:16 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 10/01/2014 04:58 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey
On 10/01/2014 06:20 PM, Darr247 wrote:
On 2014-10-01 12:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Somebody, correct me...
It also provides some measure of assurance that tampering of the content
has not occurred between time of sending and time of decryption, though
just *signing* it with the private ke
On 10/01/2014 06:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, October 1, 2014 10:19 am, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 10/01/2014 05:16 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 10/01/2014 04:58 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
Having a little gpg issue I was wondering if someone could help me
with.
On 2014-10-01 12:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Somebody, correct me...
It also provides some measure of assurance that tampering of the content
has not occurred between time of sending and time of decryption, though
just *signing* it with the private key (without also encrypting) should
acco
On Tue, September 30, 2014 17:19, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> I'm happy to sign under that, only I feel myself plagiarist here... But
> indeed I hate these days we start solving any problem by creating [google
> or any other search engine] search line instead of reading documentation
> first.
The d
On Wed, October 1, 2014 10:19 am, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
>
> On 10/01/2014 05:16 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> On 10/01/2014 04:58 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>>
>>> Having a little gpg issue I was wondering if someone could help me
>>> with.
>>>
>>> A friend of mine s
That's the thing Mark, configuring it is where I'm stuck. I'm unsure of
what addresses I'm supposed to be using as the prefixes that Hurricane
Electric gives me for /64 and /48, are different from the tunnel's endpoint
address. At least I think I'm reading it right from the tunnel's
information pag
> All of my servers and
> workstations are able to ping6 to outside targets, and anything with a browser
> installed can open ipv6.google.com.
>
> So far I have figured out that you have to run TWO instances of DHCP. One
> instance issues IPv4 and the other issues IPv6.I have not gone so far a
On 10/01/2014 05:16 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 10/01/2014 04:58 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
Having a little gpg issue I was wondering if someone could help me
with.
A friend of mine sent me an encrypted message. So I searched online and
found a a set of keys that correspond
> *gpg: encrypted with RSA key, ID 9A41C766*
> *gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available*
You may have the other parties public key, but it seems that the party sending
you messages used the wrong public key for you to encrypt the message, key ID
9A41C766 does not correspond to your pri
On 10/01/2014 04:58 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
Having a little gpg issue I was wondering if someone could help me with.
A friend of mine sent me an encrypted message. So I searched online and
found a a set of keys that correspond with his email address. And imported
them. But when I g
Hey guys,
Having a little gpg issue I was wondering if someone could help me with.
A friend of mine sent me an encrypted message. So I searched online and
found a a set of keys that correspond with his email address. And imported
them. But when I go to decrypt the message, this is what I get:
Am 01.10.2014 um 00:53 schrieb John R Pierce :
> On 9/30/2014 3:42 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Sure, for servers but I am talking about a small
>> 9W-power-consumption appliance that have this
>> requirement:-)
>
> I don't think CentOS is the appropriate distribution for
> that sort of system. Does
On Tue, September 30, 2014 10:07, ken wrote:
> Just doing "yum update" on two machines (and only two), both centos
> 5.10, one of them updated something like 22 packages, the other just 4.
> Packages which were updated on the first, but didn't get updated on
> the second machine include: gcc, ht
Hey guys,
Having a little gpg issue I was wondering if someone could help me with.
A friend of mine sent me an encrypted message. So I searched online and
found a a set of keys that correspond with his email address. And imported
them. But when I go to decrypt the message, this is what I get:
On Wed, October 1, 2014 7:58 am, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 15:51 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>> Sr System Administrator
>
> You don't write like a Komputer Xpert despite your impressive "senior"
> title :-)
>
Sorry about that "Sr" thing. I hope no one is offended. I'm sy
On Wed, October 1, 2014 8:05 am, David Both wrote:
> I have been following this - and other discussions here and elsewhere -
> and I
> have some mixed feelings about what is happening.
>
> I started with Linux at about Red Hat 5.2 in 1997 or so. I was looking to
> move
> away from OS/2 as I could
I have been following this - and other discussions here and elsewhere - and I
have some mixed feelings about what is happening.
I started with Linux at about Red Hat 5.2 in 1997 or so. I was looking to move
away from OS/2 as I could see it was dying at that point but I had no desire to
learn a
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 15:51 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Sr System Administrator
You don't write like a Komputer Xpert despite your impressive "senior"
title :-)
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.
Hi,
I've got some problem receiving mails from this list. Now and then the
mails received from this list have an invalid dkim header. Therefore
they are rejected by my MTA.
This causes me missing same mails and from time to time I get some mail
saying:
Your membership in the mailing list Cen
I too am interested in this. I use a tunnel through Sixxs and I assign IPv6
addresses using radvd. I have radvd, aiccu, DNS, DHCP (v4 only) and IPv6
routing all running on a CentOS 6.5 server. All of my servers and
workstations are able to ping6 to outside targets, and anything with a browser
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Digimer wrote on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:18:17 -0400:
> I think it would be really good if everyone took a step back, took a
> deep breath, and relaxed. This thread has generated a surprisingly (and
> to me baffling) amount of negativity.
I don't know how long you have been on this list, but it's a
On 10/1/14, keshab mahapatra wrote:
> Team,
>
> could some help me understand the booting process of CENTOS-7
>
> I need to have constructive material where i could able present a
> presentation on booting process of CENTOS-7
It's very simple actually. The first step in the booting process of
CEN
I'm completely confused here and I'm hoping someone here has a setup
they're willing to share, or help me configure things on my end.
My connectivity is through Comcast, who unfortunately, does not offer ipv6
in my area. My connection goes like this:
Comcast -> Motorola Surfboard Cable Router -> C
On 2014-09-30 19:27, Jerry Geis wrote:
Hi,
I think you need dconf for this.
.HTH
Ok I installed dconf-editor, ran it searched for many things trying to find
the
"blank screen", power or anything and did not find it.
Thoughts?
Jerry
This may or may not help:
http://xmodulo.com/control-scree
51 matches
Mail list logo
