On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:56:58AM +, Always Learning wrote:
>
> iptables -A table-name -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
>
> No reboot needed. 'table-name' can be INPUT or another user defined
> table name.
>
> firewall-cmd with its Windoze-like structure and syntax is definitely
> unappealing to
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 19:14 -0700, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> so I figured this out, I think:
>
> firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-port=2888/tcp --permanent
>
> but if is a known service, you can use:
>
> firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-service=http --permanent
>
> and then reload the f
On 10/30/2014 04:16 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> yes, so I just figured out. Thank you so much. Where does `semanage` come
> from? I tried policycoreutils-python but it cannot be found.
It should be in policycoreutils-python. Try:
yum provides \*bin/semanage
Peter
___
yes, so I just figured out. Thank you so much. Where does `semanage` come
from? I tried policycoreutils-python but it cannot be found.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 03:41 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> > Soo I changed my ssh port in sshd_config and did: syste
On 10/30/2014 03:41 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Soo I changed my ssh port in sshd_config and did: systemctl restart
> sshd.service.
...
> and I get a connection:refused.
selinux is set to only allow sshd to listen on port 22, you need to do
something like:
semanage port -a -t ssh_port_t -
Thanks Marko for the reply.
Soo I changed my ssh port in sshd_config and did: systemctl restart
sshd.service.
I then did:
firewall-cmd --add-port=port/tcp
firewall-cmd --permanent --add-port=port/tcp
firewall-cmd --reload
and for safety: systemctl restart firewalld
and I get a connection:refuse
so I figured this out, I think:
firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-port=2888/tcp --permanent
but if is a known service, you can use:
firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-service=http --permanent
and then reload the firewall
firewall-cmd --reload
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moeh
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:50:54 -0700
"Jason T. Slack-Moehrle" wrote:
> I tried to install CentOS 7 on a new system. It works.
>
> However, I'm noticing small things:
> 1. system-config-network-tui is not installed and yum cannot find it.
> I realized for this -- nmtui
>
> What about firewall? I c
On 10/29/14 07:03, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 29/10/14 03:09, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 10/28/2014 09:06 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 10/28/14 21:13, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey Y'all,
>
> After upgrade to 6.6 my gui will not start
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Alexei Altuhov wrote:
> If SElinux is in enforcing mode, check /var/log/audit/audit.log for
> messages with "denied" to nginx trying accessing your pma path.
> Or altermatevely you could run
> audit2why -brvw,
> provided you have installed the required rpm the abo
>
> in my enterprise world, production systems are fully redundant, and have
> staging servers running identical software configurations. all upgrades
> and upgrade procedures are tested on staging before being deployed in
> production.quite often, the staging systems double as the Disaster
>
I tried to install CentOS 7 on a new system. It works.
However, I'm noticing small things:
1. system-config-network-tui is not installed and yum cannot find it. I
realized for this -- nmtui
What about firewall? I can't seem to understand the replacement from
system-config-firewall-tui
Jason
Dear list members, sorry for top posting. Couldn't find a respective
setting on gmail mobile client at 2AM
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
If SElinux is in enforcing mode, check /var/log/audit/audit.log for
messages with "denied" to nginx trying accessing your pma path.
Or altermatevely you could run
audit2why -brvw,
provided you have installed the required rpm the above command is part of
beforehand. (Smth like python-policy-blah. Ca
On 10/29/2014 4:40 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Yes, indeed. Those are blasted Unix sysadmins (Hm, I flatter myself by
thinking of being one too) that push themselves into being too responsible
to their users... No, I don't think Unix admins will start into the
direction of Windows world, sorry. I d
On Wed, October 29, 2014 6:32 pm, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Valeri Galtsev
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, October 29, 2014 4:02 pm, Beartooth wrote:
>> > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:44:42 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> >
>> >> ... Basically, if one thinks he knows
>> >> more
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
> On Wed, October 29, 2014 4:02 pm, Beartooth wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:44:42 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> >
> >> ... Basically, if one thinks he knows
> >> more than system vendor, he is just schizophrenic. And we, normal
> >> p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/29/2014 04:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.10.2014 um 19:54 schrieb Steven Stern:
>> Using basically the same setup that works on C6, I have a C7 site.
>>
>> in PHP.INI, it says "error_log = /tmp/php_errors.log"
>>
>> PHP errors do not go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/29/2014 04:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.10.2014 um 19:54 schrieb Steven Stern:
>> Using basically the same setup that works on C6, I have a C7 site.
>>
>> in PHP.INI, it says "error_log = /tmp/php_errors.log"
>>
>> PHP errors do not go
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
>>> ... Basically, if one thinks he knows
>>> more than system vendor, he is just schizophrenic. And we, normal
>>> people, do give schizophrenics a privilege to be on their own. As we,
>>> normal people know that if the distro maintainers h
On Wed, October 29, 2014 4:18 pm, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.10.2014 um 22:12 schrieb Valeri Galtsev:
>> On Wed, October 29, 2014 4:02 pm, Beartooth wrote:
>>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:44:42 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>>
... Basically, if one thinks he knows
more than system vendor,
On Wed, October 29, 2014 4:02 pm, Beartooth wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:44:42 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>> ... Basically, if one thinks he knows
>> more than system vendor, he is just schizophrenic. And we, normal
>> people, do give schizophrenics a privilege to be on their own. As we,
>>
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:44:42 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> ... Basically, if one thinks he knows
> more than system vendor, he is just schizophrenic. And we, normal
> people, do give schizophrenics a privilege to be on their own. As we,
> normal people know that if the distro maintainers had to u
On 10/29/2014 1:14 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Wed Oct 29 15:27:06 UTC 2014, John R Pierce pierce at hogranch.com wrote:
>what do you mean by 'raid users' ? I saw nothing on that long
>thread of misdirection that appeared to be raid related.
See this comment:
<---
MagnusMWW commented 2 days
On Wed Oct 29 15:27:06 UTC 2014, John R Pierce pierce at hogranch.com wrote:
> what do you mean by 'raid users' ? I saw nothing on that long
> thread of misdirection that appeared to be raid related.
See this comment:
<---
MagnusMWW commented 2 days ago
An update; the problem in my case was
First I know this is not a list for PHP or Nginx setup or something else
but I'll give it a try and ask here for support I'm running a new server
with PHP 5.5.18 and Nginx 1.6.2 through FPM/FastCGI. The server is working
fine since I have other websites running on it. Now I'm trying to configure
ph
Using basically the same setup that works on C6, I have a C7 site.
in PHP.INI, it says "error_log = /tmp/php_errors.log"
PHP errors do not go there (or anywhere).
1. Apache has write perms to /tmp
2. I have restarted httpd since changing php.ini
3. The base php.ini is from the development versio
On 10/27/14 2:20 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 10/27/2014 01:13 PM, CS DBA wrote:
Hi All,
I am switching from Fedora20 to CentOS7 since I now run all my Linux
development in a VM and I get a more robust feature set (i.e. shared
folders with the host that "just work", etc)
The only issue I have th
On Wed, October 29, 2014 9:28 am, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.10.2014 um 15:22 schrieb Valeri Galtsev:
>>
>> On Wed, October 29, 2014 9:06 am, Steve Clark wrote:
>>> On 10/29/2014 10:02 AM, Beartooth wrote:
I'm running CentOS 6 (6.5 iirc) on my wife's machine, which I've
been upd
Once upon a time, Bowie Bailey said:
> RHEL, and therefore CentOS, does not support maintaining a specific
> point release version.
That's not true for RHEL. A subscription can be switched to an extended
x.y.z release train (but that's a "you get what you pay for" kind of
thing; that level of ex
On 10/29/2014 11:43 AM, Beartooth wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:22:35 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, October 29, 2014 9:06 am, Steve Clark wrote:
+100
Me too. I was [mistakenly, apparently] always considering 5.[n+1],
6.[m+1] just re-spins, thus providing latest packages with _backport
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:22:35 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Wed, October 29, 2014 9:06 am, Steve Clark wrote:
>> +100
>>
> Me too. I was [mistakenly, apparently] always considering 5.[n+1],
> 6.[m+1] just re-spins, thus providing latest packages with _backported_
security
> patches/bugfixes,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014, at 09:22, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Wed, October 29, 2014 9:06 am, Steve Clark wrote:
> > On 10/29/2014 10:02 AM, Beartooth wrote:
> >>I'm running CentOS 6 (6.5 iirc) on my wife's machine, which I've
> >> been updating pretty much every day. Today yum got 425 package
On 10/28/2014 5:32 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 10/28/2014 04:00 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
Sorry not sure what's wrong with this statement. I've tried a few
variations of trying to exclude the /var/www directory.
[root@224432-24 apr-1.5.1]# find / -name "*httpd*" -type d \( ! -name
w
On 10/29/2014 8:00 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
Q2.https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/2575 seems to be of some concern
for CentOS-7 users. Are others experiencing this or is it specific to raid
users?
what do you mean by 'raid users' ? I saw nothing on that long thread of
misdirection th
centos-release.x86_64-7-0.1406.el7.centos.2.5@updates
zfs-release.noarch-1-2.el7.centos @/zfs-release.el7.noarch
I am in the process of setting up a CentOS-7 workstation which, eventually,
will be a kvm host for several versions of MS-Windows. Before I get to that
point I wis
Hello Digimer,
i'm already configured cluster.conf like your advice, but when start cman
manually on web3 ( cman already stopped ), web2 fenced by web3.
Here the log on web3 :
Oct 29 14:38:42 web3 ricci[2557]: Executing '/usr/bin/virsh nodeinfo'
Oct 29 14:38:42 web3 ricci[2557]: Executing '/usr/bi
On 29/10/14 09:33 AM, aditya hilman wrote:
Oct 29 13:15:30 web2 fenced[1548]: fenced 3.0.12.1 started
Oct 29 13:15:30 web2 fenced[1548]: fenced 3.0.12.1 started
Oct 29 13:15:30 web2 dlm_controld[1568]: dlm_controld 3.0.12.1 started
Oct 29 13:15:30 web2 dlm_controld[1568]: dlm_controld 3.0.12.1 st
In 2-node clusters, never allow cman or rgmanager to start on boot. A
node will reboot for two reasons; it was fenced or it is scheduled
maintenance. In the former case, you want to review it before restoring
it. In the later case, a human is there to start it already. This is
good advice for 3
On Wed, October 29, 2014 9:06 am, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 10:02 AM, Beartooth wrote:
>> I'm running CentOS 6 (6.5 iirc) on my wife's machine, which I've
>> been updating pretty much every day. Today yum got 425 packages!
>>
>> Somewhere a dam must have broken. Sometimes some o
On 10/29/2014 10:02 AM, Beartooth wrote:
I'm running CentOS 6 (6.5 iirc) on my wife's machine, which I've
been updating pretty much every day. Today yum got 425 packages!
Somewhere a dam must have broken. Sometimes some of us don't
appreciate how much work the developers do.
I'm running CentOS 6 (6.5 iirc) on my wife's machine, which I've
been updating pretty much every day. Today yum got 425 packages!
Somewhere a dam must have broken. Sometimes some of us don't
appreciate how much work the developers do.
Strength to their arms, and many he
Hello Dominic,
Thanks for the response.
when I start cman manually, web3 fenced by web2. Here the logs :
web2 : /var/log/messages/
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]: [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine
('1.4.1'): started and ready to provide service.
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]: [MAIN
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 29/10/14 03:09, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 10/28/2014 09:06 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>>> On 10/28/14 21:13, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Hey Y'all,
After upgrade to 6.6 my gui will not start. The problem is probably
related to th
Hello Johnny,
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 04:35:02 -0500 Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 03:59 AM, wwp wrote:
> > Hello there,
> >
> >
> > I'm checking if I can upgrade safely from CentOS6.5 to 6.6 using yum,
> > and here's what it says:
> >
> > =
> > [snip]
> > --> Finished
Hi,
Does anybody know how to solving this "fence loop" ?
> master_wins="1" is not working properly, qdisk also.
>
Logs shared are not sufficient to identify the cause of fence loop. I would
suggest you to
1. Disable cman - chkconfig cman off ( and rgmanager also if you wish ) -
on both the nodes
On 10/29/2014 10:47 AM, Dominic Geevarghese wrote:
* Enabling scsi logging would be the next step to figure it out the reason
why tape is not functioning in latest kernel.
The machine is in production so I'll have to wait until I get a chance
to reboot to the new kernel.
I have a spare mach
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 08:07 AM, Dominic Geevarghese wrote:
>
>> ok. I think, it would be really great if you could share the output of
>>
>> # lspci -vn | egrep '05:00.0|0b:00.0'
>>
>
> Booted on the old kernel:
>
> 05:00.0 0104: 103c:323a (rev
On 10/29/2014 03:59 AM, wwp wrote:
> Hello there,
>
>
> I'm checking if I can upgrade safely from CentOS6.5 to 6.6 using yum,
> and here's what it says:
>
> =
> [snip]
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-4
Hello there,
I'm checking if I can upgrade safely from CentOS6.5 to 6.6 using yum,
and here's what it says:
=
[snip]
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.centos.plus will be erased
---> Package kerne
Hi Guys,
I'm using centos 6.5 as guest on RHEV and rhcs for cluster web environment.
The environtment :
web1.example.com
web2.example.com
When cluster being quorum, the web1 reboots by web2. When web2 is going up,
web2 reboots by web1.
Does anybody know how to solving this "fence loop" ?
master_w
On 10/29/2014 08:07 AM, Dominic Geevarghese wrote:
ok. I think, it would be really great if you could share the output of
# lspci -vn | egrep '05:00.0|0b:00.0'
Booted on the old kernel:
05:00.0 0104: 103c:323a (rev 01)
0b:00.0 0104: 103c:323a (rev 01)
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
ht
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Johnny Hughes
> Sent: den 28 oktober 2014 17:17
> To: CentOS ML
> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-6.6 is Released
>
> Just letting everyone here know, CentOS-6.6 is now released:
>
> http://l
Hi,
> 05:00.0 RAID bus controller: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array G6
> controllers (rev 01)
> 0b:00.0 RAID bus controller: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array G6
> controllers (rev 01)
>
ok. I think, it would be really great if you could share the output of
# lspci -vn | egrep '05:00.0|0b
55 matches
Mail list logo
