> I would say take a look at the latest fglrx drivers at elrepo and see if
> they work.
>
> http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el6/
Thanks for the suggestion but unfortunately not. When I boot a 6.6
kernel with the fglrx driver, my machine completely locks up. with
the stock ATI driver X would lock
One of our VM clusters has four CentOS 6.6 machines. I'm in the
process of testing the addition of a CentOS 7 box (with the goal of
upgrading the 6.6 machines soon).
A newly created VM running on a 6.6 node has a machine type of
rhel6.6.0:
hvm
The libvirt on the CentOS 7 mach
Apologies for the previous top post :-( Forgot to trim the (...)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Possibly your system was installed or cloned using PartedMagic, and that
left an entry in
/etc/ethers
mapping your default nic to the name 'PartedMagic'?
K
Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289
Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382
DealMax Pty
Alfred von Campe writes:
> On Dec 3, 2014, at 12:01, Greg Bailey wrote:
>
> > I think you'd need to use the "isohybrid" command that's included in the
> > syslinux package.
>
> BING! BING! BING! We have a winner! Thanks for that info, it makes
> the USB stick bootable. This will make kickstar
On Dec 3, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Jeff Boyce wrote:
> My objective is to RAID1 the two drives, use LVM on top of the RAID
btrfs will meet both your functional objectives (mirroring, management, and
expandability) and should be simpler to set up within the CentOS 7 installer.
It also gets you a m
On 12/3/2014 3:09 PM, g wrote:
On 12/03/2014 04:15 PM, zep wrote:
>
>>>oh. the ARP packet suggests that MAC address is 192.168.1.144
>>that is how i see it.
>>
>is that 1.144 IP address in use by the machine you ran the lspci
>from?
somewhere. but i know not where.
http://www.whoami.it/h
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Cal Webster
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 17:35
> To: CentOS List
> Subject: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites
> with New DoD CAC
>
> Can anyone help with getti
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:09 PM, g wrote:
>
>>>
>> is that 1.144 IP address in use by the machine you ran the lspci
>> from?
>
> somewhere. but i know not where.
>
> http://www.whoami.it/home/ shows me to be;
>adsl-184-41-28-86.mem.bellsouth.net
> for the hell of it, i pulled and reconnected D
On 12/03/2014 04:15 PM, zep wrote:
>
>>> oh. the ARP packet suggests that MAC address is 192.168.1.144
>> that is how i see it.
>>
> is that 1.144 IP address in use by the machine you ran the lspci
> from?
somewhere. but i know not where.
http://www.whoami.it/home/ shows me to be;
adsl-1
On 12/3/2014 1:53 PM, g wrote:
new paste at;
http://pastebin.com/rCU0CC10
hopeful this will give better info and answers.
thanks again to respondents.
again, wireshark is, for some unknown reason, calling that
00:0f:fe:8f:8f:23 MAC address "PartedMagic", this MAC is associated with
the
Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
web sites.
I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card) when one of the
buildings I work in upgraded their security system. My old CAC was
working fine p
On 12/03/2014 05:05 PM, g wrote:
> John,
> thank you for replying.
>
> On 12/03/2014 03:21 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 12/3/2014 12:47 PM, g wrote:
>>> wireshark text file loaded at;
>>>
>>> http://pastebin.com/rCU0CC10
>> some device on your network has the MAC address 00:0f:fe:8f:8f:23
>>
>> oh. the ARP packet suggests that MAC address is 192.168.1.144
> that is how i see it.
>
is that 1.144 IP address in use by the machine you ran the lspci from?
I think his original intent was that perhaps it was a separate device
are you running VMs on this host by chance?
--
public gpg key
John,
thank you for replying.
On 12/03/2014 03:21 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/3/2014 12:47 PM, g wrote:
>> wireshark text file loaded at;
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/rCU0CC10
>
> some device on your network has the MAC address 00:0f:fe:8f:8f:23
> which Wireshark is calling PartedMagic for
new paste at;
http://pastebin.com/rCU0CC10
hopeful this will give better info and answers.
thanks again to respondents.
--
peace out.
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.
tc,hago.
g
.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://
On 12/3/2014 12:47 PM, g wrote:
wireshark text file loaded at;
http://pastebin.com/rCU0CC10
some device on your network has the MAC address 00:0f:fe:8f:8f:23 which
Wireshark is calling PartedMagic for unknown reasons. That MAC prefix
apparently belongs to an obscure Chinese computer make
Hi David,
Am 03.12.2014 um 02:14 schrieb David McGuffey :
> This is an automatically generated mail message from mdadm
> running on desk4
>
> A DegradedArray event had been detected on md device /dev/md0.
>
> Faithfully yours, etc.
>
> P.S. The /proc/mdstat file currently contains the following
On Dec 3, 2014, at 12:01, Greg Bailey wrote:
> I think you'd need to use the "isohybrid" command that's included in the
> syslinux package.
BING! BING! BING! We have a winner! Thanks for that info, it makes
the USB stick bootable. This will make kickstart installations so much
easier, especia
On 12/03/2014 04:49 AM, g wrote:
<>
my bad. :-(
to SilverT257 and Mark Mihollan,
thank you for responding. my "chemo brain" gets forgetful.
i am taking system offline after sending this and will run wireshark
again to see if there is anything different.
thanks again.
--
peace out.
in a
On 12/03/2014 11:12 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
<>
> Maybe.
> A bit odd since that's assigned as Comcast VOIP and not a
> static customer block.
this is true.
> I'd dump the traffic with tcpdump or wireshark and analyze it.
i have a text file saved. see below
which "save as" form should be used
On 12/03/2014 11:13 AM, Mark Milhollan wrote:
<>
> Do you mean PartedMagic as the destination port? If so that's just a
> translation from the port number to a name found in your /etc/services
> file. It is often wrong or misleading, and in most cases can be
> ignored.
i have no PartedMagi
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Wade Hampton
wrote:
> I am building QT 4.8.6 on CentOS 5 and it is failing on building
> the webkit module with __sync_add_and_fetch_4 not being defined.
> My build is for Embedded Linux, which allows me to use the framebuffer.
>
> Posts report this error when tryi
Greetings -
I am trying to install CentOS 7 into a new Dell Precision 3610. I have two
3 TB drives that I want to setup in software RAID1. I followed the guide
here for my install as it looked fairly detailed and complete
(http://www.ictdude.com/howto/install-centos-7-software-raid-lvm/). I
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 17:15 +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > Has anyone else noticed this? Any ideas as to why it might be happening?
>
> /etc/sysconfig/kernel
>
Yes and no. The above file has not been changed and states that a new
kernel should be the default.
It seems this problem has already
> Has anyone else noticed this? Any ideas as to why it might be happening?
/etc/sysconfig/kernel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:49 AM, g wrote:
> i have been noticing a short connection burst in system monitor every
> time i connect to internet.
>
> i got curious and decided to run wireshark to see what was happening.
>
> seems that i am connecting to 96.195.141.178 with destination of
> "PartedMa
Hello,
I have just installed CentOS 7 onto two servers and applied all the
current patches. There are currently two kernels installed:
# rpm -q kernel
kernel-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64
kernel-3.10.0-123.9.3.el7.x86_64
However, if I reboot the servers they both start up on the older kernel:
# uname
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 12/03/2014 03:24 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
>
>> OTOH, I had a perfectly good drive get kicked out of my RAID-1
>> array a fewyears ago just because, well, I guess I could say
>> "it felt like it".
>>
>
> I've seen that too several times on my h
On 12/03/2014 09:51 AM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
I’ve been creating slightly modified CentOS netinstall ISO images using the
following steps:
Copy contents of CentOS netinstall ISO image to a temporary directory
Edit isolunux/isolinux.cfg file
Create new ISO image using the following command: mk
I’ve been creating slightly modified CentOS netinstall ISO images using the
following steps:
Copy contents of CentOS netinstall ISO image to a temporary directory
Edit isolunux/isolinux.cfg file
Create new ISO image using the following command: mkisofs -o new.iso -b
isolinux/isolinux.bin -c isol
On 12/02/2014 10:30 PM, Darby Vicker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I saw in the CentOS 6.6 release notes that the Xorg ABI has changed but
> that "This should not concern anyone who uses the default drivers shipped
> with CentOS." I'm using the ATI drivers in Base but X still fails when I
> boot a CentOS 6.
if i understood cerrectly,you need that:
domain=$(tcpdump -l -n -e port 53 | awk '{if ($14 ~ /A.*?/) print $15}')
while read line
do echo $line
done < $domain
On 3 December 2014 at 08:29, Hal Wigoda wrote:
> What is domain, BTW?
>
> (Sent from iPhone, so please accept my apologies in advance for
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
i have been noticing a short connection burst in system monitor every
time i connect to internet.
i got curious and decided to run wireshark to see what was happening.
seems that i am connecting to 96.195.141.178 with destination of
"PartedMagic".
this seemed strange because i do not have Parted
Indeed, thanks Dan - it doesn't get us to a completely clean running that
would allow us to run our Node app as we are under Passenger with SELinux
enforcing, but it at least has stopped the excessive amount of AVCs we were
getting.
John
On 3 December 2014 at 10:01, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Look
Looks like turning on three booleans will solve most of the problem.
httpd_execmem, httpd_run_stickshift, allow_httpd_anon_write
On 12/03/2014 03:55 AM, John Beranek wrote:
> Mark: Labels look OK, restorecon has nothing to do, and:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /bin/
Mark: Labels look OK, restorecon has nothing to do, and:
-rwxr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /bin/ps
dr-xr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:proc_t:s0 /proc
I'll send the audit log on to Dan.
Cheers,
John
On 2 December 2014 at 16:10, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Could you
38 matches
Mail list logo
