On 12/19/2014 03:52 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> what you say makes sense, but leaves me with two problems - what to do
> and how did this happen?
You never mentioned if this is for a dom0 or domu, if it's a domu is it
a pv or hvm domain and does it use pvgrub, pygrub or does it boot
directly to a ke
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 18:23 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B)
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Or, just make the question interesting enough that someone will reply to
> >> it
> >>
> >
> > Does a crash report and bug filing qualify? The silence on that one has
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 08:20 -0500, David Both wrote:
> +1
>
> It can be quite annoying when the X console is changed from one Virtual
> Console
> to another as happens with almost every release of CentOS and Fedora. I would
> really like it to be always consistent at Console 7. And the "real" s
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B)
wrote:
>>
>> Or, just make the question interesting enough that someone will reply to
>> it
>>
>
> Does a crash report and bug filing qualify? The silence on that one has
> deafened me! :-))
>
Only if someone else has seen the same symptoms
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B)
wrote:
>>>
>> Gmail conveniently hides list emails that you send from appearing as
>> new in your inbox because you've obviously already seen them.
>> Opinions may differ on that matter of course If you are using the
>> web interface you can
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 23:53 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Keith Keller
> wrote:
> > On 2014-12-18, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> >>
> >>
>
> Or, just make the question interesting enough that someone will reply to
> it
>
Does a crash report and bug filing qualif
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 22:00 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 12/17/14 19:31, Keith Keller wrote:
> > On 2014-12-17, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> >> I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I
> >> reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about
> >>
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 16:31 -0800, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-12-17, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> > I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I
> > reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about
> > that before I reported the bug.
>
> [snip]
>
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 17:00 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B)
> wrote:
> > I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I
> > reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about
> > that before I reported the
On 12/19/2014 08:11 AM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> ran routine updates on the lernel this morning and got this:
>
> WARNING: No module xenblk found for kernel 2.6.18-400.1.1.el5,
> continuing anyway
You've installed kernel instead of kernel-xen. In CentOS 5 you must
install kernel-xen for Xen dom0 or
On 12/18/2014 08:11 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> ran routine updates on the lernel this morning and got this:
>
> WARNING: No module xenblk found for kernel 2.6.18-400.1.1.el5,
> continuing anyway
i'm not sure that i can help you, i have currently no centos5 vm on xen.
But i guess the warning is fr
On 12/15/2014 03:01 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
Is there a way to reboot temporarily into one of the other kernels listed
in grub.conf, without changing the default= line, so that a subsequent
reboot will default back to the original kernel?
Use "grub2-reboot". There's no man page, but --help
ran routine updates on the lernel this morning and got this:
WARNING: No module xenblk found for kernel 2.6.18-400.1.1.el5,
continuing anyway
The only references I can find are a year or so old. Anyone able to
comment? or refer me? Have not rebooted.
uname -a
Linux bulkley.bvserver.ca 2.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:41 AM, wwp wrote:
>>
>> I would rather work on single files or tars on directory basis. Using a
>> single big file creates a very "large" single point of failure.
>> Or use an encrypted file system (of course, also a single point of
>> failure, but probably better handli
Hello,
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:51:31 +0100 Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I would rather work on single files or tars on directory basis. Using a
> single big file creates a very "large" single point of failure.
> Or use an encrypted file system (of course, also a single point of
> failure, but probabl
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:20 AM, David Both
wrote:
> +1
>
> It can be quite annoying when the X console is changed from one Virtual
> Console to another as happens with almost every release of CentOS and
> Fedora. I would really like it to be always consistent at Console 7. And the
> "real" syste
I would rather work on single files or tars on directory basis. Using a
single big file creates a very "large" single point of failure.
Or use an encrypted file system (of course, also a single point of
failure, but probably better handling).
Kai
___
On Thu, December 18, 2014 00:31, Jake Shipton wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> In this situation 2.2.29 actually does offer an advantage over CentOS
> version 2.2.15.
>
> The version provided by CentOS does not support Forward Secrecy for SSL
> or TLS 1.2.
>
> Version 2.2.24+ of upstream Apache includes pa
+1
It can be quite annoying when the X console is changed from one Virtual Console
to another as happens with almost every release of CentOS and Fedora. I would
really like it to be always consistent at Console 7. And the "real" system
console should always be Console 1.
I am OK with change,
Hello Guys…
I need to revert the X11 graphical server to Console 7.
and enable VT1 as normal text as it was on the old distr..
Sincerely
AndyBe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Nov 17, 2014 12:13 PM, "Steve Clark" wrote:
>
> On 11/17/2014 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> On 11/17/2014 10:05 AM, Darr247 wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17 November 2014 @15:19 zulu, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I (we, the CentOS Project) can not distribute flash
>>>
>>> Is it because Adobe said
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hello Les,
Wednesday, December 17, 2014, 3:54:36 PM, you wrote:
LM> if the NAS offers nfs
It does, but I'm waiting for an answer from Zyxel as to why the data rate
is limited to about 3.5Mb/s as opposed to 60-70Mb/s to a CIFS share
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni..
23 matches
Mail list logo
