Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora

> On Jan 2, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > I’m not interested in the reverse case, where an old server could not take > over from a newer one, because there’s no good reason to manage the upgrade > that way. You drop the new one in as a backup, take the old one offline, > upgrade

Re: [CentOS] When will CentOS Publish Errata?

> However, luckily, Gmane archives everything just fine. > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.centos.devel/12370/focus=12375 Thanks Steven for bringing this thread to my attention. So it looks like there was already a discussion about this in September, and it ended with two action items. 1. Wr

Re: [CentOS] Fetchmail multiple instances increasing load average

On 12/29/2014 01:16 AM, Anshul Chauhan wrote: I’m running centos 5.7 with sendmail-8.13.8-8.1.el5_7, fetchmail-6.3.6-4.el5 and procmail-3.22-17.1.el5.centos. My server is having around 2000 mailboxes and this server used to fetch mails for all these users using fetchmail from the other MX server.

Re: [CentOS] additional network config

Am 04.01.2015 um 19:32 schrieb ken : > A system whose network routing table looks like this (abbreviated): > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface > 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 > 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1

[CentOS] additional network config

A system whose network routing table looks like this (abbreviated): Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 00

Re: [CentOS] subscription of Cent - OS newletter

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 04/01/15 01:16 AM, Bijesh Maskey wrote: >> >> Dear Sir/ Ma'am >> i would like to suscribe to the cenos newletter its update and patches >> release thanks regards >> b > > > If you visit this page: > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo > >