Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

2015-01-19 Thread Fred Smith
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:01:02PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >>> > >

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

2015-01-19 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 20

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

2015-01-19 Thread Fred Smith
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > >> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian > >> wrote

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

2015-01-19 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] reboot - is there a timeout on filesystem flush?

2015-01-19 Thread Charles Polisher
On Jan 07, 2015 at 01:47:53PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > > I see a bunch of entries like: > ioatdma :00:08.0: Channel halted, chanerr = 2 > ioatdma :00:08.0: Channel halted, chanerr = 0 > in the logs and one of these: > hrtimer: interrupt took 258633 ns > > Not sure what those mean. W

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

2015-01-19 Thread Robert Arkiletian
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Johnny, > >>> > >>> Any ETA on version 39.0.2

Re: [CentOS] tg3 network link unstable

2015-01-19 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Full updated EL6: Does someone have the same behaviour, unstable eth > interface (tg3/no dhcp)? > > Jan 19 18:01:46 ane kernel: tg3 :04:00.0: eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, > full duplex > Jan 19 18:01:46 ane kernel: tg3 :04:00.0: et

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

2015-01-19 Thread Phelps, Matthew
Thanks for the status report Johnny. Is there anyone we can pester (besides you :) )? On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM,

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

2015-01-19 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian >> wrote: >> >>> Johnny, >>> >>> Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 >>> >>> cheers >>> >>> >> >> bump If I could build it, I would. At

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.6 Fail2Ban and Postfix Selinux AVCs

2015-01-19 Thread James B. Byrne
On Mon, January 19, 2015 11:50, James B. Byrne wrote: > I am seeing these in the log of one of our off-site NX hosts running > CentOS-6.6. > > type=AVC msg=audit(1421683972.786:4372): avc: denied { create } for > pid=22788 comm="iptables" scontext=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 > tcontext=syste

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

2015-01-19 Thread Phelps, Matthew
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian > wrote: > > > Johnny, > > > > Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 > > > > cheers > > > > > > bump > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] tg3 network link unstable

2015-01-19 Thread Leon Fauster
Full updated EL6: Does someone have the same behaviour, unstable eth interface (tg3/no dhcp)? Jan 19 18:01:46 ane kernel: tg3 :04:00.0: eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jan 19 18:01:46 ane kernel: tg3 :04:00.0: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX Jan 19 18:01:46 ane

[CentOS] CentOS-6.6 Fail2Ban and Postfix Selinux AVCs

2015-01-19 Thread James B. Byrne
I am seeing these in the log of one of our off-site NX hosts running CentOS-6.6. type=AVC msg=audit(1421683972.786:4372): avc: denied { create } for pid=22788 comm="iptables" scontext=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 tclass=rawip_socket Was caused

Re: [CentOS] Documentation link on new Firefox CentOS 7 splash screen

2015-01-19 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 01/18/2015 09:55 PM, Peter wrote: > On 01/19/2015 10:51 AM, Tim wrote: >> Just my two cents: Anyone thought of asking Red Hat to use >> documentation? I think they are getting much from the community so >> to copy public accessible documentation when permitted by RH could be >> an easy way. >>