Re: [CentOS] C5 & C6 : useradd

On 25.01.2015 04:54, Always Learning wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 22:45 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 03:43:06AM +, Always Learning wrote: > >>> Should the 'correct' entry be:- >>> >>> fred:x:504:504:::/sbin/nologin ? >> >> No; that's invalid. There must

Re: [CentOS] C5 & C6 : useradd

On Sat, January 24, 2015 9:54 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 22:45 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 03:43:06AM +, Always Learning wrote: > >> > Should the 'correct' entry be:- >> > >> >fred:x:504:504:::/sbin/nologin ? >> >> No; that's invalid

Re: [CentOS] C5 & C6 : useradd

On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 22:45 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 03:43:06AM +, Always Learning wrote: > > Should the 'correct' entry be:- > > > > fred:x:504:504:::/sbin/nologin ? > > No; that's invalid. There must be an entry in the home directory field. Thanks Ste

Re: [CentOS] C5 & C6 : useradd

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 03:43:06AM +, Always Learning wrote: > -M, do not create user's home directory > > so why do I see in /etc/passwd > > fred:x:504:504::/home/fred:/sbin/nologin -M stops it doing a "mkdir" to create the actual directory in the filesystem > Should the 'corr

Re: [CentOS] C5 & C6 : useradd

On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 04:38 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 25.01.2015 04:30, Always Learning wrote: > > > > useradd --help > > > > -d, --home-dir HOME_DIR home directory for the new user account > > -M, do not create user's home directory > > yet > > useradd -M -s /sbi

Re: [CentOS] C5 & C6 : useradd

On 25.01.2015 04:30, Always Learning wrote: > > useradd --help > > -d, --home-dir HOME_DIR home directory for the new user account > -M, do not create user's home directory > yet > useradd -M -s /sbin/nologin FRED > > produces in /etc/passwd > > fred:x:504:504::/home/fred:

[CentOS] C5 & C6 : useradd

useradd --help -d, --home-dir HOME_DIR home directory for the new user account -M, do not create user's home directory yet useradd -M -s /sbin/nologin FRED produces in /etc/passwd fred:x:504:504::/home/fred:/sbin/nologin Trying again with useradd -d /dev/null -s /sb

Re: [CentOS] Display configuration for greeter??

On 01/24/2015 08:57 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: With dual monitors, how do I control which monitor will get the greeter display. I would really like to configure the screens as mirrored. Trying to log in when the monitor with the greeter is not visible is very trying. This is in CentOS 6. Sorry

[CentOS] Display configuration for greeter??

With dual monitors, how do I control which monitor will get the greeter display. I would really like to configure the screens as mirrored. Trying to log in when the monitor with the greeter is not visible is very trying. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.

Re: [CentOS] find out who accessed a file

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:32:01PM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > One other thing I would try: disable selinux, and see if that lets > apache read file, e.g.: > > setenforce 0 Setting SELinux to permissive temporarily is a good start, although it's also helpful to check the audit logs, with: au

Re: [CentOS] Postfix (I think) problem

On 01/24/2015 04:39 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Actually, I appended both to /etc/postfix/mail.cf -- mailbox_size_limit = 2000 message_size_limit = 1900 - I don't know how big your mailbox is, but that seems like kind of a small limit. In

Re: [CentOS] Postfix (I think) problem

On Sat, January 24, 2015 6:39 pm, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> On 01/24/2015 07:10 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>>mailbox_size_limit = 2000 >> >> I think you meant message_size_limit. > > Actually, I appended both to /etc/postfix/mail.cf > -- > m

Re: [CentOS] Postfix (I think) problem

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/24/2015 07:10 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>mailbox_size_limit = 2000 > > I think you meant message_size_limit. Actually, I appended both to /etc/postfix/mail.cf -- mailbox_size_limit = 2000 message_size_limit = 1900 ---

Re: [CentOS] Postfix (I think) problem

Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 24.01.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Timothy Murphy: >> I'm getting repeated email (KMail) error messages >> about one apparently over-large post: >> -- >> Received: from helen.gayleard.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by >> helen.gayleard.com (Po

Re: [CentOS] VLAN issue

Andrew and Dennis are spot on. Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < denni...@conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN c

Re: [CentOS] Postfix (I think) problem

On 01/24/2015 07:10 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: mailbox_size_limit = 2000 I think you meant message_size_limit. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Postfix (I think) problem

On 01/24/2015 09:10 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I'm getting repeated email (KMail) error messages about one apparently over-large post: -- Received: from helen.gayleard.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by helen.gayleard.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4500294A0 for ; Sat

Re: [CentOS] find out who accessed a file

On Sat, January 24, 2015 11:27 am, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hey guys, > > Unless you're using auditd (or a similar service) to watch the file, > no. You could probably use the logs and `last` to see who was logged > in at the time and make a guess. > > > > Also, you can look into shell history files (

Re: [CentOS] find out who accessed a file

Hey guys, Unless you're using auditd (or a similar service) to watch the file, no. You could probably use the logs and `last` to see who was logged in at the time and make a guess. Also, you can look into shell history files (though that might be cleaned by users). Admin is allowed to do that

Re: [CentOS] Postfix (I think) problem

Am 24.01.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Timothy Murphy: I'm getting repeated email (KMail) error messages about one apparently over-large post: -- Received: from helen.gayleard.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by helen.gayleard.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4500294A0 for ; Sa

[CentOS] Postfix (I think) problem

I'm getting repeated email (KMail) error messages about one apparently over-large post: -- Received: from helen.gayleard.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by helen.gayleard.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4500294A0 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:00:05 + (GMT) Received: (

Re: [CentOS] VLAN issue

Hi Boris, what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs). When I look at the switchport coniguration here I get (among other things): ... Port link-type: trunk Tagged VLAN ID : 8, 1624 Untagged VLAN ID : 10 ... Here is my

Re: [CentOS] VLAN issue

Hi Boris, Is the switch port mode tagged or untagged. Thanks, Andrew On 24 January 2015 at 13:35, Boris Epstein wrote: > Do you need the whole configuration? On the switch end, we have the > relevant VLAN (VLAN 48) with the assigned IP address of 192.168.48.101 and > the range of ports (Gi1/0

Re: [CentOS] VLAN issue

Do you need the whole configuration? On the switch end, we have the relevant VLAN (VLAN 48) with the assigned IP address of 192.168.48.101 and the range of ports (Gi1/0/1 - Gi1/0/8) assigned to that VLAN. Seems - and acts - like a legitimate setup and works fine, except for this particular instanc

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..