On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 16:46 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm exporting a directory, firewall's open on both machines (one CentOS
6.6, the other RHEL 6.6), it automounts on the exporting machine, but
the
other server, not so much.
ls
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote:
According to this pdf [1] alignment is important but from what I understand
512e emulation still has a small RMW performance hit from writes that are
smaller than 4k or if the writes are not a multiple of 4k.
There
Estimados.
Tengo que armar un server que soporte aproximadamente 10k visitas diarias.
El sitio es de ecommerce actualmente alojado en la infraestructura de Yahoo!
El sitio va a ser migrado a Magento.
Mi tarea, es diseñar los servidores que van a soportar la estructura y
requieren que sea sobre
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
You are implying that firmware of hardware RAID cards is somehow buggier
than software of software RAID plus Linux kernel (sorry if I
misinterpreted your point).
Drives, and hardware RAID cards are subject to
On Sat, February 28, 2015 4:22 pm, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
Indeed. That is why: no LVMs in my server room. Even no software RAID.
Software RAID relies on the system itself to fulfill its RAID function;
what if
- Original Message -
| On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:24:57 -0800
| John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
| On 2/27/2015 4:52 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote:
|
| What is the right way to recover the remaining PVs left?
|
| take a filing cabinet packed full of 10s of 1000s of files of 100s of
|
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
Indeed. That is why: no LVMs in my server room. Even no software RAID.
Software RAID relies on the system itself to fulfill its RAID function;
what if kernel panics before software RAID does its job? Hardware RAID
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 4:28 PM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
People who understand how to use the system do not suffer these problems.
LVM adds a bit of complexity for a bit of extra benefits. You can't blame
LVM for user error. Not having monitoring in place or backups is a
Am Freitag, 27. Februar 2015 16:38 schrieb Mike McCarthy, W1NR:
Is there a reason why you need 2.4 vs. the 2.3 package from the CentOS6
repos?
Using Outlook-Clients and need support of XLIST.
AFAIK implemented in 2.4
Timothy
___
CentOS mailing list
On Fri, February 27, 2015 10:00 pm, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:24:57 -0800
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 2/27/2015 4:52 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote:
What is the right way to recover the remaining PVs left?
take a filing cabinet packed full of 10s of 1000s of
- Original Message -
| On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 4:28 PM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
|
| People who understand how to use the system do not suffer these problems.
| LVM adds a bit of complexity for a bit of extra benefits. You can't
| blame LVM for user error. Not having
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 5:59 PM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
There is no difference between a single disk system and a multi-disk system
in terms of being able to dynamically resize volumes that reside on a volume
group. Having the ability to resize a volume to be either larger
12 matches
Mail list logo
