Re: [CentOS] NFS Stale file handle drives me crazy (Centos 6)

2015-04-05 Thread Ted Miller
On 04/02/2015 09:03 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: Hi folks, I have a Centos 6 NFS server, which dirves me crazy. The directory I try to export cant be accessed by different clients. I tried a centos 7, centos 6 and a pool of vmware esxi 5.5 systems. At the client side I get errors

Re: [CentOS] video problem since 2015-04-01 update

2015-04-05 Thread Jay Warren
I am getting the same problem as the OP but I am on nvidia.   -Original message- From:Bill Maltby (C4B) Sent:Sat 04-04-2015 12:32 pm Subject:Re: [CentOS] video problem since 2015-04-01 update To:centos@centos.org; On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 11:24 -0500, Francis Gerund wrote: > Is there a way

Re: [CentOS] The future of centos

2015-04-05 Thread Always Learning
On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 21:27 +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote: > If this is a problem, just pick another RHEL clone like Scientific Linux ? I thought I read on this List the intention of Scientific to base its future distribution on Red Hat's Centos product. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Je

Re: [CentOS] The future of centos

2015-04-05 Thread Eero Volotinen
2015-04-04 4:01 GMT+03:00 Francis Gerund : > Almost everyone here has probably read this by now. If so, move along, > nothing new here. But just in case you haven't, please take the time to > read this. > > Here it is, in their own words: what Redhat thinks of Centos, and it's > plans for the fu

Re: [CentOS] The future of centos

2015-04-05 Thread Always Learning
On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 20:12 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/4/2015 8:10 PM, dE wrote: > > > > If you guys have that much of a problem with CentOS/RedHat > > collaboration, why not just move on things like Debian, arch, Suse etc... > > they just like to whine. If the *whole* truth had been

[CentOS] Selinux issues with 7.1 update

2015-04-05 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I am trying to update some local policies for bacula that allow a series of clients with pre run scripts to su in order to perform some preparatory work for a backup. With selinux enforcing, the su is denied obviously execute as bacula_t tries su_exec_t. You only see this with enforcing enabled?

Re: [CentOS] Access Problem after update to CentOS 7.1

2015-04-05 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 16:53 +0200, Andrea Dell'Amico wrote: > > On 05 Apr 2015, at 14:35, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > I sure need some help on this one, if any of you have ideas of what to > > do next I would surely appreciate it. An additional aspect of this > > scenario is that when I have us

Re: [CentOS] Fail2Ban Centos 7 is there a trick to making it work?

2015-04-05 Thread Andrea Dell'Amico
> On 30 Mar 2015, at 13:35, John Horne wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 14:43 +0100, Andrea Dell'Amico wrote: >> >> #= logrotate_t == >> allow logrotate_t fail2ban_client_exec_t:file { ioctl read execute >> execute_no_trans open }; >> > Looks like this was already fixed

Re: [CentOS] Access Problem after update to CentOS 7.1

2015-04-05 Thread Andrea Dell'Amico
> On 05 Apr 2015, at 14:35, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > I sure need some help on this one, if any of you have ideas of what to > do next I would surely appreciate it. An additional aspect of this > scenario is that when I have used ssh to connect to this mail server via > the internal network, I a

Re: [CentOS] The future of centos

2015-04-05 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, April 4, 2015 10:12 pm, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/4/2015 8:10 PM, dE wrote: >> >> If you guys have that much of a problem with CentOS/RedHat >> collaboration, why not just move on things like Debian, arch, Suse >> etc... > > they just like to whine. > Some did move to other systems (eve

[CentOS] perf trace

2015-04-05 Thread Александр Кириллов
# perf trace perf: 'trace' is not a perf-command. See 'perf --help'. Should 'perf trace' work in C6.6 or this is a bug related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892893? # rpm -qa perf perf-2.6.32-504.12.2.el6.x86_64 ___ CentOS mailing l

Re: [CentOS] Access Problem after update to CentOS 7.1

2015-04-05 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 16:47 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > This morning I did a manual yum update on our a mail server to 7.1 > without any incident or problems. A new kernel was installed, and I > rebooted after the update. > > When I rebooted the machine I could not gain ssh