Yes, that is very much like the problem I encountered, but in my case it
did not need multiple monitors to happen, just one. The config file
suggested did seem to fix the problem, at least serving as a (hopefully)
temporary workaround.
Johnny, thanks for the pointer. And thanks to all who replie
On Apr 10, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> Seems RH, intoxicated by Fedora's wildest screwballs, has started to
> loose its purpose and its sense of direction.
This is just absurd.
Fedora and Red Hat are just using Gnome’s default settings for the user list.
Red Hat even documents
On April 10, 2015 7:45:00 PM EDT, Steven Barre
wrote:
>Hello Everyone
>
>I'm looking into the best way to have locked version repos for my
>CentOS
>systems. The systems are all set up with Chef and have a couple
>different recopies/roles. I'd like to have locked version repos for
>each
>role
On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 09:07 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Thu, April 9, 2015 13:12, zep wrote:
>
> > frankly, this blows my mind. not long ago there was a huge kerfuffle
> > over the change to only allow (as someone defined it 'secure') certain
> > passwords, requiring numbers, special cha
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 06:33:27AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> What may be happening is that you may need to be on the console and
> accept the license on the first reboot after the update.
>
> We tried to turn this off for CLI only installs, but in some
> combinations of software, you may stil
mrepo or reposync works fine with apache.
Eero
11.4.2015 2.45 ap. "Steven Barre"
kirjoitti:
> Hello Everyone
>
> I'm looking into the best way to have locked version repos for my CentOS
> systems. The systems are all set up with Chef and have a couple different
> recopies/roles. I'd like to have
Hello Everyone
I'm looking into the best way to have locked version repos for my CentOS
systems. The systems are all set up with Chef and have a couple
different recopies/roles. I'd like to have locked version repos for each
role with tested RPMs. Then perhaps quarterly apply any updates. It
> On Apr 10, 2015, at 17:12, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> Less sure about 6. Maybe look at /var/cache/gdm ?
I think you nailed it! I was using “grep -R” to search for all files that
contained the usernames I wanted to remove, but gdm creates directories named
after the usernames, which is why I
On 04/04/2015 04:47 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> This morning I did a manual yum update on our a mail server to 7.1
> without any incident or problems. A new kernel was installed, and I
> rebooted after the update.
>
> When I rebooted the machine I could not gain ssh access to
On 04/10/2015 08:24 AM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
That file/RPM does not appear to be available on CentOS 6.
Yeah, I *completely* spaced and thought you'd asked about 7.
Less sure about 6. Maybe look at /var/cache/gdm ?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@
try creating small /boot partition for kernel and then rest of disk for
lvm..
--
Eero
2015-04-10 22:01 GMT+03:00 :
> Chuck Campbell wrote:
> > I'm really at a loss.
> > I had 5.11 running on this machine, from this physical boot disk, until I
> > stepped on /bin the other day.
> >
> > I've trie
On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 13:25 -0500, Chuck Campbell wrote:
>
> So stage two of the saga, I thought I would try to install CentOS 6.5 (I had
> the
> dvds burned already). It boots, but claims the install image is corrupt.
>
> I re-downloaded CentOS 6.6, verified the checksums and burned a new dvd
12 matches
Mail list logo
