On 4/20/2015 9:08 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
The second idea was to set each filesystem to a different random count
value. This would run the risk of having two or more executions at
the same time but it would probably not be very frequent.
Does anyone have a suggestion for a better way of do
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> CentOS 6
>
>
> My first idea was to manually run fsck on each filesystem, one every
> couple of weeks. That way they will not all come due at the same time
> if we reboot on a regular basis.
>
> The second idea was to set each filesystem
CentOS 6
Hi All:
Over the weekend I had to reboot one of my systems and got hit with
fsck runs on all of the filesystems. I would not mind so much except
doing them all at once took over an hour. I would like to be able to
stagger these, ideally only execute one fsck per reboot. I have been
able
Thanks, I just found that one myself. In fact on a different platform
the error message from Chrome actually explains it directly rather
than just quote the error string.
I was too focused on restricting the search to lighttpd and not enough
on the error string.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:20 PM,
You need to reissue cert with stronger hash algorithm than sha1
Eero
21.4.2015 1.13 ap. "Bart Schaefer" kirjoitti:
> Apologies if I should ask this elsewhere, google search is not helping.
>
> I've got a CentOS5 server with lighttpd installed from EPEL,
> configured for https only (no connection
On 4/20/2015 3:12 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
"NET::ERR_CERT_VALIDITY_TOO_LONG".
Is this just a configuration issue (in which case, what do I change?)
or do I need to further upgrade one of lighttpd or openssl?
says your certificate's valid interval is too long. recent chrome
rejects certs tha
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:12:36 -0700
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> Is this just a configuration issue (in which case, what do I change?)
Your certificate is apparently valid for longer than 39 months.
Running your error message "NET::ERR_CERT_VALIDITY_TOO_LONG" through google
returns pages and pages of
Apologies if I should ask this elsewhere, google search is not helping.
I've got a CentOS5 server with lighttpd installed from EPEL,
configured for https only (no connections on ports other than 443). I
have the latest security updates for openssl, etc. However, when
connecting to the server wit
On 4/20/2015 2:07 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On Apr 20, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>
>Does anyone know where I could find wireshark-1.12.4 el6 rpm?
CentOS is not the OS for you if you wish to have the very latest releases of
software.
The Wireshark project doesn’t provide Linux binari
I am using a kickstart centos 1503 file.
For some reason I am getting a mediacheck even though
I do not have mediacheck in my kickstart file.
Any ideas why?
Something change on that?
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.o
On Apr 20, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>
> Does anyone know where I could find wireshark-1.12.4 el6 rpm?
CentOS is not the OS for you if you wish to have the very latest releases of
software.
The Wireshark project doesn’t provide Linux binaries, apparently since it’s
already shipped
Hi,
Does anyone know where I could find wireshark-1.12.4 el6 rpm?
Thanks,
--
Stephen Clark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 4/16/2015 2:13 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 04/15/2015 12:55 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Has anyone used the Dell M3800 (ubuntu) laptop to run CentOS 6.x? If so how
>> did it work out?
>>
>> Also does anyone have a fairly new laptop they are running CentOS 6.x on,
>> that they are h
Greetings Johnathan.
Thank you for the reply.
I have run top, and iftop, etc...
The only process that is listed is as follows:
Tasks: 272 total, 2 running, 270 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 7.1 us, 18.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 73.8 id, 0.7 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.1 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 32679644
On 04/20/2015 08:48 AM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
>> I would say to eliminate issues, the first thing to make sure is that
>> your mailcap package is, indeed, good.
>
> Summary: it's a good package, but the wrong package for the location.
>
> I downloaded the package from a diff
> I would say to eliminate issues, the first thing to make sure is that
> your mailcap package is, indeed, good.
Summary: it's a good package, but the wrong package for the location.
I downloaded the package from a different mirror, and the install proceeds
past it. However, now it stops at
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 09:00:07AM -0400, Martes wrote:
> Greetings again everyone.
>
> Can someone please respond to this?
You just posted yesterday...
Anyway, you didn't give much context. I can see from a google search
why you provided the interrupts output, but judging from what you
poste
Greetings again everyone.
Can someone please respond to this?
I am not sure what is causing this issue, however, others seem to have
experienced it in the past.
Could this be caused by the processor being damaged?
Nothing has changed on the system, except for the heat warning shutoff when
On 04/20/2015 07:21 AM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> I have been installing CentOS for years using PXE, kickstart and NFS, but the
> procedure fails with CentOS 6.6 for some reason.
>
> A PXE-initiated, manual install goes through all the setup steps, and once
> rpm installation has
I have been installing CentOS for years using PXE, kickstart and NFS, but the
procedure fails with CentOS 6.6 for some reason.
A PXE-initiated, manual install goes through all the setup steps, and once
rpm installation has started, it dies after a few packages:
anaconda 13.21.229 exception repor
20 matches
Mail list logo
