Just to clarify...
I have just tested the immediate change taking effect, after reading the page
listed in the other reply.
For some reason I was able to see immediate change on my vms, however, now that
I try it on the Host, it does not persist.
So maybe when I was setting things up, I actual
Greetings everyone.
I have some CentOS 7 VMs running on the system for which I just made the
inquiry about the kworker problem, and I was able to institute immediate change
of hostname by updating the /etc/hostname file.
I have network manager running on the host, as well, and it also has the n
In CentOS 7.x, two new Live CDs are introduced:
CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-GnomeLive.iso and CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-KdeLive.iso
My question is: is this a long term strategy? or in other words, will they be
maintained in all future CentOS 7.x releases?
Since CentOS 6.4 or 6.5, many system tools are
On Apr 22, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
>
> I have done some "what if" testing.
Using which tool? My simulator, or something you cooked up yourself? If the
latter, would you care to share?
I’ve updated mine to break out the stats for 3+ volumes instead of just
reporting all
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 04/22/15 01:13, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> About a week ago; I posted a proposal over on the centos-devel mailing
> list, the proposal is for a SIG 'CentOS hardening', there were a few of
> the members of the community who are also interested in this. Therefore,
> I am extending that
On 04/22/15 06:44, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a summary of some of the major things going on in the project,
> its not a comprehensive list, but should cover most of the major
> traction points:
>
> Firstly, lets all welcome Brian Stinson to the fold (
> http://lists.centos.org/piper
On 2015-04-22 3:57 pm, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:49 PM, David Both
wrote:
Yes confusion will abound. There should only ever be one and only one
DHCP
server on any network. With two you will sooner of later have multiple
DHCP
client hosts with the same IP addresses.
No,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:49 PM, David Both
wrote:
> Yes confusion will abound. There should only ever be one and only one DHCP
> server on any network. With two you will sooner of later have multiple DHCP
> client hosts with the same IP addresses.
No, it's not going to give out duplicate IPs.
Yes confusion will abound. There should only ever be one and only one DHCP
server on any network. With two you will sooner of later have multiple DHCP
client hosts with the same IP addresses.
On 04/22/2015 03:36 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I'd like to consolidate the services from several old serv
I'd like to consolidate the services from several old servers onto 2
CentOS7 VMs that are currently running dhcpd in a balanced/failover
configuration. It will simplify things to add the IPs from the old
servers as aliases, at least temporarily so everything will continue
to connect without chang
I was sending my manager a copy of a form, and attached it (not inline),
using -t-bird, and he complains it didn't want to open. Looking at the
message source, t-bird had decided that the mime type was all/allfiles,
though the name ended in .pdf. I've searched via the config editor, and
I've been g
From: Warren Young Sent: April 21, 2015 14:13
> On Apr 21, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> >
> > From: Kay Diederichs Sent: April 21, 2015 03:43
> >>
> >> instead of having 20 for all of them, set
> >> the first filesystem to 17, the second to 19, the third to
> 23, and the
> >> fo
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 10:16 +0200, Tim wrote:
> I think, this SIG would/should care about hardening CentOS itself as a system
> not a complete environment (proxies, firewalls, etc.)
> The examples of the opener show this.
>
> Something else could be integrity checking possibly.
>
> I imagine a t
Can someone enlighten me why this:
wget --quiet --no-check-certificate
ttps://flub.githubusercontent.com/jodrell/jwhois/master/example/jwhois.conf
; echo $?
returns this:
0
When wget --no-quiet says this:
wget --no-quiet --no-check-certificate
ttps://flub.githubusercontent.com/jodrell/jwhois
Greetings everyone.
I ran the cat on the proc files for the reference pid before I sent the first
email, however here it is, since I never listed the contents.
sudo cat /proc/91/stack
[] 0x
And when following the information from the closed bugzilla debug info, I get
the foll
On 04/22/2015 07:52 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Two quick questions:
>
> 1) I have not found where I can set the workspaces to 1, not 4.
> Where is that.
>
gnome-tweak-tool -> shell -> Dynamic workspaces (ignore the 'off'
setting) and set 4 -> 1.
> 2) My install (text mode only) seems to be using
Two quick questions:
1) I have not found where I can set the workspaces to 1, not 4.
Where is that.
2) My install (text mode only) seems to be using F1 as X11, I have
to switch to ALT-F2 to get a login prompt. What controls that?
X is not running, this is a console only.
Thanks,
Jerry
_
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hi,
This is a summary of some of the major things going on in the project,
its not a comprehensive list, but should cover most of the major
traction points:
Firstly, lets all welcome Brian Stinson to the fold (
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013211.html )
--
Up
I think, this SIG would/should care about hardening CentOS itself as a system
not a complete environment (proxies, firewalls, etc.)
The examples of the opener show this.
Something else could be integrity checking possibly.
I imagine a tool/script that could apply hardening stuff.
Regards
Tim
A
Sounds like a bit basic stuff? How about hardening ciphers, two factor
authentication, snort, web application firewall and scap scanning?
Eero
22.4.2015 10.14 ap. "Andrew Holway" kirjoitti:
> SELinux?
>
> On 22 April 2015 at 09:11, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> > On 4/21/2015 11:34 PM, Eero Volotine
SELinux?
On 22 April 2015 at 09:11, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/21/2015 11:34 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>> apply also ideas from this document:
>> https://benchmarks.cisecurity.org/downloads/show-single/?file=rhel6.130
>>
>
> that should be your baseline. I suspect you'll find all the things
On 4/21/2015 11:34 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
apply also ideas from this document:
https://benchmarks.cisecurity.org/downloads/show-single/?file=rhel6.130
that should be your baseline. I suspect you'll find all the things you
mentioned are discussed in the CIS benchmarks.
--
john r pier
24 matches
Mail list logo
