Hi All
My guest is a CentOS 5.4 VM:
[root@localhost ~]# uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 03:28:30 EDT 2009 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@localhost ~]# cat /etc/*release
CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
I wanted to know if the virtio drivers on this guest are stable.
Am 06.05.2015 um 09:33 schrieb Jatin Davey :
> My guest is a CentOS 5.4 VM:
Best practice: update to the latest OS version:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.11 (Final)
> [root@localhost ~]# uname -a
> Linux localhost 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 03:28:30 EDT 2009 x86_64
> x86_6
On 5/6/2015 1:18 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 06.05.2015 um 09:33 schrieb Jatin Davey :
My guest is a CentOS 5.4 VM:
Best practice: update to the latest OS version:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.11 (Final)
[root@localhost ~]# uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Thu S
On 05/06/2015 03:04 AM, Jatin Davey wrote:
> On 5/6/2015 1:18 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 06.05.2015 um 09:33 schrieb Jatin Davey :
>>> My guest is a CentOS 5.4 VM:
>>
>> Best practice: update to the latest OS version:
>>
>> # cat /etc/redhat-release
>> CentOS release 5.11 (Final)
>>
>>
>>
>>> [r
On 04/14/2015 08:54 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Morning, Johnny,
>
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> For those of you not currently on the centos-devel mailing list, we are
>> looking to test signed repomd.xml files (repomd.xml.asc) for CentOS-6
>> and CentOS-7. If you are interested in signed metadata
> You have several hundred more Critical or Important security updates
> outstanding. If that box touches the Internet in any way, it is likely
> compromised. Just in the last 6 months there are 21 Important or
> Critical updates.
That is an important qualifier: *If* that box touches the Inter
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 05/06/2015 06:04 AM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
>> You have several hundred more Critical or Important security updates
>> outstanding. If that box touches the Internet in any way, it is likely
>> compromised. Just in the last 6 months there are 21 Important or
>> Critical update
Am 06.05.2015 um 13:04 schrieb lheck...@users.sourceforge.net:
>
>> You have several hundred more Critical or Important security updates
>> outstanding. If that box touches the Internet in any way, it is likely
>> compromised. Just in the last 6 months there are 21 Important or
>> Critical updat
Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 06.05.2015 um 13:04 schrieb lheck...@users.sourceforge.net:
>>
>>> You have several hundred more Critical or Important security updates
>>> outstanding. If that box touches the Internet in any way, it is likely
>>> compromised. Just in the last 6 months there are 21 Impor
Thanks a lot for the explanation. I have confused some things while
crawling through the manuals.
Now i have removed the 'ldap' from the /etc/nsswitch.conf. Now it looks
like this:
passwd: files sss
shadow: files sss
group: files sss
hosts: files dns
bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUN
> And I, personally, would want an email from aforesaid manager telling me
> not to do any upgrades, which I would print out in several copies and put
> in a secure place
>
You do not understand the situation I presented. This is about avoiding
a situation where in a highly complex envirno
On Wed, May 6, 2015 9:28 am, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
>> And I, personally, would want an email from aforesaid manager telling me
>> not to do any upgrades, which I would print out in several copies and
>> put
>> in a secure place
>>
>
> You do not understand the situation I p
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>
>
> I have a couple of boxes with NVIDIA cards and fancy screen setup. I have
> to use NVIDIA proprietary driver, open source driver does not support
> configuration. Darn Nvidia never released enough information about their
> Now, back to my boxes. NVIDIA declared these
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:20 AM, wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> Now, back to my boxes. NVIDIA declared these fancy cards obsolete (the are
>> only about 6 years old, and hardware still does appropriate job for what
>> we need). There is no proprietary NVIDIA driver which you can install with
>
Am 06.05.2015 um 16:28 schrieb lheck...@users.sourceforge.net:
>
>> And I, personally, would want an email from aforesaid manager telling me
>> not to do any upgrades, which I would print out in several copies and put
>> in a secure place
>>
>
> You do not understand the situation I presente
On Wed, May 6, 2015 10:20 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a couple of boxes with NVIDIA cards and fancy screen setup. I
>> have
>> to use NVIDIA proprietary driver, open source driver does not support
>> configuration. Darn Nvidia never released enough infor
I have one of those new little NUC's and installed Centos 7.1 on it.
lspci shows
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Haswell-ULT DRAM Controller (rev 09)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Haswell-ULT Integrated
Graphics Controller (rev 09)
00:03.0 Audio device: Intel Corpora
I've got a DN2820FYKH and graphics were a problem until I install kernel-ml
from ElRepo.
http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
HTH
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Jerry Geis"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: We
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:20 AM, wrote:
>> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>>> Now, back to my boxes. NVIDIA declared these fancy cards obsolete (the
>>> are only about 6 years old, and hardware still does appropriate job for
>>> what we need). There is no proprietary NVIDIA driver whi
On 05/06/2015 07:24 AM, Ulrich Hiller wrote:
Now i have removed the 'ldap' from the /etc/nsswitch.conf. Now it looks
like this:
Looks good.
My /etc/openldap/ldap.conf is this:
OK, but that file isn't used for name service or authentication. Mostly
just the openldap tools (ldapsearch, lda
I list,
I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish this
work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they are too
tape oriented. Another is that they are very powerfull but more complex. I
need a solution for small office for disk storage and I found Backu
Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> I list,
> I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish this
> work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they are too
> tape oriented. Another is that they are very powerfull but more complex. I
> need a solution for small office
> On May 6, 2015, at 9:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>> I list,
>> I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish this
>> work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they are too
>> tape oriented. Another is that they are very p
On Wed, May 6, 2015 2:46 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>> I list,
>> I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish
>> this
>> work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they are
>> too
>> tape oriented. Another is that they are very
So, we've got a couple of WinDoze servers, and we getting logs from them.
Except the logs seem to stop on occasion. My manager set me onto this (I
*loathe* WinDoze, but someone's gotta do it), and I finally found out that
a previous co-worker installed eventlog-to-syslog, which seems to be
hosted
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>> I list,
>> I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish
>> this work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they are
>> too tape oriented. Another is that they are very powerfull but more
complex.
>> I ne
On Wed, May 6, 2015 3:27 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>>> I list,
>>> I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish
>>> this work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they
>>> are
>>> too tape oriented.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 3:26 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> So, we've got a couple of WinDoze servers, and we getting logs from them.
> Except the logs seem to stop on occasion. My manager set me onto this (I
> *loathe* WinDoze, but someone's gotta do it), and I finally found out that
> a previous c
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 3:27 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Alessandro Baggi wrote:
I list,
I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish
this work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don't dismiss Amanda it works well in a disk based setup. I don't
bother with the spooling disk though. I back up to virtual tape slots
on an external disk and rotate three external disks; two are in the
firesafe at work, one is on top of my PC.
On
The front page of centos.org refers to "CentOS 7 (1503)". I thought
that the final decision was to call it "CentOS 7.1 (1503)", so that
people wouldn't be confused when comparing the upstream and CentOS
versions?
While we're at it, if I click on "Documentation" it doesn't show any
docs for CentOS
On 6 May 2015 at 22:49, J Martin Rushton wrote:
> Don't dismiss Amanda it works well in a disk based setup. I don't
> bother with the spooling disk though. I back up to virtual tape slots
> on an external disk and rotate three external disks; two are in the
> firesafe at work, one is on top of m
Hi,
I have had the same problem and I solved it with following commands :
iscsiadm -m node -o show (not sure this was useful)
iscsiadm -m node --login
iscsiadm -m session -o show
after, umount -f and mount each mountpoint and now I can show disks with
command blkid.
Hope will help.
Laurent
On 5/6/2015 1:34 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
My assistant liked backuppc. It is OK and will do decent job for really
small number of machines (thinking 3-4 IMHO). I run bacula which has close
to a hundred of clients; all is stored in files on RAID units, no tapes.
Once you configure it it is nice.
Il 07/05/2015 00:47, John R Pierce ha scritto:
On 5/6/2015 1:34 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
My assistant liked backuppc. It is OK and will do decent job for really
small number of machines (thinking 3-4 IMHO). I run bacula which has
close
to a hundred of clients; all is stored in files on RAID uni
Hello Alessandro,
Wednesday, May 6, 2015, 9:21:10 PM, you wrote:
> I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish this
> work.
Everybody has its favorite backup program, but why rely on only one system?
I have to backup 8 servers and use three backup systems in parallel.
37 matches
Mail list logo
