On 7 May 2015 21:49, "Alfred von Campe" wrote:
>
> I would like to move to CentOS 7 and a model where we don’t use NIS at
all, the users and (local) home directories are automatically created on
login using the UID stored on the LDAP server. Before I re-invent the
wheel, has somebody done this alr
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Timothy Murphy
> Sent: den 7 maj 2015 23:21
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution
>
> >> The worst thing about BackupPC is the insane error message
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: den 7 maj 2015 19:09
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution
>
> my year of monthlies and month of dailies of 25 servers has be
On 5/7/2015 2:21 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
>On 5/7/2015 4:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>The worst thing about BackupPC is the insane error message
>>"Unable to read 4 bytes", which comes up if anything is wrong.
>>Possibly the worst error message anywhere?
>
>thats an rs
> On May 6, 2015, at 15:17, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> That's a good one, Mark! You made my day. Didn't you know that Windows
> programmers the only ones who count 1,2,3,4,5,... [all normal programmers
> count 0,1,2,3,4,5,... AFAIK]. I wonder how at all they got "0" in their
> levels ;-)
Integer
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/7/2015 4:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> The worst thing about BackupPC is the insane error message
>> "Unable to read 4 bytes", which comes up if anything is wrong.
>> Possibly the worst error message anywhere?
>
> thats an rsync protocol message, and yeah, debugging
On 05/07/2015 12:07 PM, Ulrich Hiller wrote:
login with the wrong password gives a denied login.
login with the correct password always works.
This is my sitution since the begin of my thread.
Got it. I misread part of your last message, and thought that logins
were /not/ working when sssd w
What is showing in the apache error log?
Original Message
> Date: Thursday, May 07, 2015 04:28:16 PM -0400
> From: John
>
> Directories permissions: 755 Files permissions: 644
>
> On 15-05-07 04:21 PM, John wrote:
>> I forgot to mention it. All the files under /var/ht
We currently use a combination of Kerberos and NIS to manage users on our
CentOS 6 systems in a Windows AD environment. NIS is provided by Windows
Services for UNIX (or something named similarly), which has some issues, and is
also not going to be supported by Microsoft in the future. NIS supp
I understand that an I agree. I will correct it after my access problem
is solved.
On 15-05-07 04:32 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/7/2015 1:21 PM, John wrote:
I forgot to mention it. All the files under /var/html are owned by
apache:apache
thats actually a bad practice, as you do NOT want th
On 5/7/2015 1:21 PM, John wrote:
I forgot to mention it. All the files under /var/html are owned by
apache:apache
thats actually a bad practice, as you do NOT want the web server to have
write access to the main content... if someone hacks your web scripts,
having write access means they can
Directories permissions: 755 Files permissions: 644
On 15-05-07 04:21 PM, John wrote:
I forgot to mention it. All the files under /var/html are owned by
apache:apache
On 15-05-07 04:07 PM, Eric Lehmann wrote:
Have you checked the file rights under your document root ?
Your apache group need r
I forgot to mention it. All the files under /var/html are owned by
apache:apache
On 15-05-07 04:07 PM, Eric Lehmann wrote:
Have you checked the file rights under your document root ?
Your apache group need reading right.
Am 07.05.2015 21:42 schrieb "John" :
Hi all, Freshly installed apache 2.
Have you checked the file rights under your document root ?
Your apache group need reading right.
Am 07.05.2015 21:42 schrieb "John" :
> Hi all, Freshly installed apache 2.2 with httpd-itk (from epel). When I
> try to access apache's document root from a browser on local network, it
> always serve
Hi all, Freshly installed apache 2.2 with httpd-itk (from epel). When I
try to access apache's document root from a browser on local network, it
always serve me the Apache welcome page, even if I have a index.html and
a phpinfo.php file in the /var/www/html folder. If point the browser
specific
Thanks a lot for looking over the config.
I am at the topic "user data is available"
id
and
getent passwd
and
ldapsearch -x -b "ou=XXX,o=YYY" uid=
give the correct results
ldapsearch gives also the correct host attribute i have set in the ldap
server.
Regarding the manpage of sssd.conf the li
On 5/6/2015 11:23 PM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
when disk is filled, on bacula we can recycle disk volumes. What's for
BackupPC? There is automatic backup deletion over retention time?
my year of monthlies and month of dailies of 25 servers has been more or
less constant size for a year or two
On 5/7/2015 4:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
The worst thing about BackupPC is the insane error message
"Unable to read 4 bytes", which comes up if anything is wrong.
Possibly the worst error message anywhere?
thats an rsync protocol message, and yeah, debugging
connection/authentication issues
--On Thursday, May 07, 2015 06:41:03 PM +0300 Jussi Hirvi
wrote:
But why rotate drives? Big drives are not very expensive nowadays.
1. Redundant copies.
2. Sometimes your filesystems are larger than the largest drives.
For example, I'm currently seting up backups for a 24TB filesystem
w
On 7.5.2015 14.24, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
I admit one think it does miss is having a convenient way to look for
a file, specially if you physically rotate drives. If rdiff-backup
will tell when was the last time a file has been backed up/touched
even if drive with said file is not mounted, I wil
Il 07/05/2015 11:55, Marcin Trendota ha scritto:
W dniu 07.05.2015 o 11:46, Alessandro Baggi pisze:
I don't know why and don't know if in previous CentOS releases was
included.
It is in EPEL.
BackupPC is available for C7 from nux repo, but this is an external repo.
Good enough, thanks for
On 2015-05-06, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> This sounds like Apple borrowed your idea for their time machine (I bet
> you are doing it for much-much linger than Apple time machine exists)!
rsnapshot has been using rsync with hard links for ages.
http://rsnapshot.org/
--keith
--
kkel...@wombat.sa
On 05/07/2015 05:04 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
I wonder why nobody has yet mentioned rdiff-backup. It combines
browsable directories with multiple versions - the version data is
stored in a separate rdiff-backup-data subdirectory (one per backup task).
I use rdiff-backup, but I hesitate to recommen
>Jerry, try "ntpdate -u time.apple.com" and have a look at the -u option
>in the ntpdate man page. When you use -d, it implicitly sets -u, which
>your non-"-d" invocation didn't. That's probably the reason for the
>difference.
>Cheers
>Tony
Tony - your correct. That did work. the odd thing als
In article ,
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I noticed this morning that my ntp time was not correct on machines.
>
> So I manually ran "ntpdate time.apple.com" on my clients, I got
> 7 May 08:46:43 ntpdate[10550]: no server suitable for synchronization found
>
> then I ran "ntpdate -d time.apple.com" and i
I noticed this morning that my ntp time was not correct on machines.
So I manually ran "ntpdate time.apple.com" on my clients, I got
7 May 08:46:43 ntpdate[10550]: no server suitable for synchronization found
then I ran "ntpdate -d time.apple.com" and it worked .
filter offset: -163.446 -163.446
Geenhuizen wrote:
> I’ve been using BackupPC for several years for my 10 hosts, and works
> extremely well, however it can take a lot of disk space, so I’d recommend
> a dedicated drive for the backups.
I've been running BackupPC on two home servers (in different places)
running CentOS for many y
On May 7, 2015 6:05 AM, "Jussi Hirvi" wrote:
>
> I wonder why nobody has yet mentioned rdiff-backup. It combines browsable
directories with multiple versions - the version data is stored in a
separate rdiff-backup-data subdirectory (one per backup task).
>
> One downside is that rdiff-backup cause
I wonder why nobody has yet mentioned rdiff-backup. It combines
browsable directories with multiple versions - the version data is
stored in a separate rdiff-backup-data subdirectory (one per backup task).
One downside is that rdiff-backup causes a lot of network traffic. For
that reason I cur
W dniu 07.05.2015 o 11:46, Alessandro Baggi pisze:
> I don't know why and don't know if in previous CentOS releases was
> included.
It is in EPEL.
> BackupPC is available for C7 from nux repo, but this is an external repo.
Good enough, thanks for info.
--
Over And Out
MoonWolf
___
Il 07/05/2015 11:24, Marcin Trendota ha scritto:
W dniu 06.05.2015 o 21:21, Alessandro Baggi pisze:
What do you mean about Backup PC?
Any experiences?
What solution do you use?
BackupPC is good, howewer it's a pity you can't search for a file in
GUI. But it works well, i'm backing up 32 hosts
W dniu 06.05.2015 o 21:21, Alessandro Baggi pisze:
> What do you mean about Backup PC?
> Any experiences?
> What solution do you use?
BackupPC is good, howewer it's a pity you can't search for a file in
GUI. But it works well, i'm backing up 32 hosts (servers, desktops).
Can somebody tell me why
Am 07.05.2015 um 08:35 schrieb Michael Schumacher :
>
> Everybody has its favorite backup program, but why rely on only one system?
>
> I have to backup 8 servers and use three backup systems in parallel.
>
> -- BackupPC. Easy to use, nice user interface with graphical recovery
> of individual f
> Thanks, Akemi, that's really useful, and I'd never heard of it. I suppose
> that as it gets updated, it'll tell me the most current legacy to use (in
> my case, the 310.40 worked, but the 340.58 did not... and that was trial
> and error.
It's all in the README that comes with the driver ... o
34 matches
Mail list logo
