Hey all,
I just unstalled MariaDB version 10 from the mariadb repositories under a
CentOS 7 host.
The install went fine!
[root@nfsdb1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep -i mariadb
MariaDB-common-10.0.19-1.el7.centos.x86_64
MariaDB-server-10.0.19-1.el7.centos.x86_64
MariaDB-client-10.0.19-1.el7.centos.x86_64
M
It's service Marian start
Sent from my iPad
> On May 10, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I just unstalled MariaDB version 10 from the mariadb repositories under a
> CentOS 7 host.
>
> The install went fine!
>
> [root@nfsdb1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep -i mariadb
> MariaDB-common-
On 10 May 2015 at 14:47, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I just unstalled MariaDB version 10 from the mariadb repositories under a
> CentOS 7 host.
>
> The install went fine!
>
> [root@nfsdb1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep -i mariadb
> MariaDB-common-10.0.19-1.el7.centos.x86_64
> MariaDB-server-10.0.19-1.
Sorry - spellcheck.
service mariadb start
Sent from my iPad
> On May 10, 2015, at 2:01 PM, Hal Wigoda wrote:
>
> It's service Marian start
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On May 10, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I just unstalled MariaDB version 10 from the mariadb
Hello Tim,
On 10 May 2015 at 14:47, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I just unstalled MariaDB version 10 from the mariadb repositories under a
> CentOS 7 host.
>
> The install went fine!
>
> [root@nfsdb1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep -i mariadb
> MariaDB-common-10.0.19-1.el7.centos.x86_64
> MariaDB-serve
Hi Earl,
>I think I found your problem, you do not have the correct package installed
>[root@c7-db1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep maria
>mariadb-libs-5.5.41-2.el7_0.x86_64
>mariadb-server-5.5.41-2.el7_0.x86_64
>mariadb-5.5.41-2.el7_0.x86_64
>[root@c7-db1 ~]#
>Install the mariadb-x package and you should be
On 10 May 2015 at 15:17, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hi Earl,
>
> >I think I found your problem, you do not have the correct package
> installed
>
> >[root@c7-db1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep maria
> >mariadb-libs-5.5.41-2.el7_0.x86_64
> >mariadb-server-5.5.41-2.el7_0.x86_64
> >mariadb-5.5.41-2.el7_0.x86_64
> >[ro
On 5/10/2015 1:04 PM, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
Did a little Googling [0] and I saw that they recommend starting it as
follows:
/etc/init.d/mysql start
which is old school sysVinit style.
my guess is, you'll need to fix up a systemd service description file,
like /usr/lib/systemd/system/mariadb.
Original Message
> Date: Sunday, May 10, 2015 01:20:34 PM -0700
> From: John R Pierce
>
> On 5/10/2015 1:04 PM, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
>> Did a little Googling [0] and I saw that they recommend starting
>> it as follows:
>>
>> /etc/init.d/mysql start
>
> which is old s
Actually, the systemctl command is:
systemctl start mysql.service
from the "systemctl show" output it looks like this actually calls
the /etc/rc.d/init.d/mysql file for start/stop/reload, which seems
backwards.
It appears that mariadb is trying to be a total drop-in replacement
to mysql, so a
I'm old school.
If it works...
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hi Earl,
>
> >I think I found your problem, you do not have the correct package
> installed
>
> >[root@c7-db1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep maria
> >mariadb-libs-5.5.41-2.el7_0.x86_64
> >mariadb-server-5.5.41-2.el7_0.x86_64
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 17:42 -0500, Hal Wigoda wrote:
> I'm old school.
> If it works...
. don't *** change it ?
C7 appears to be a nightmare. So many problems. I do not remember as
many problems with the introduction of C6.
I like lasting stability. Same commands. Same reliability. No
On 05/09/2015 05:00 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
modern filesystems and image formats do not allocate the whole space if not
neccessary (qcow2 feature).
Not specifically. Every disk image type would be sparse if it were
copied off a disk and back by a tool that wrote them correctly.
qcow2 does
On 05/08/2015 08:28 PM, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
While this configuration is functional I regret creating a new storage
pool in /home.
Out of curiosity, why?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 5/10/2015 5:03 PM, Always Learning wrote:
C7 appears to be a nightmare. So many problems. I do not remember as
many problems with the introduction of C6.
so far, other than having to learn a couple new commands, C7 really
hasn't been a problem for us, everything we need to run works just fi
Hey guys,
I've got another C7 problem I was hoping to solve. I
installed appdynamics-php-agent-4.0.5.0-1.x86_64 on a C7.1 host.
It's failing to communicate with it's controller on another host. And this
is the interesting part. Whether or not I have SELinux enabled, I have
apache reporting SELinu
On 05/09/2015 01:24 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
Is it normal to have pam_unix and pam_sss twice for each each section?
No. See my previous message. I think it's the result of copying
portions of SuSE configurations.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 06:00:05PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> so far, other than having to learn a couple new commands, C7 really
> hasn't been a problem for us, everything we need to run works just
> fine.
Once I decided to stop complaining about C7, it wasn't bad to learn
about the different
Original Message
> Date: Sunday, May 10, 2015 06:08:22 PM -0700
> From: Greg Lindahl
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 06:00:05PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> so far, other than having to learn a couple new commands, C7
>> really hasn't been a problem for us, everything
Original Message
> Date: Sunday, May 10, 2015 09:02:11 PM -0400
> From: Tim Dunphy
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I've got another C7 problem I was hoping to solve. I
> installed appdynamics-php-agent-4.0.5.0-1.x86_64 on a C7.1 host.
>
> It's failing to communicate with it's contr
On 05/10/2015 06:50 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/08/2015 08:28 PM, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
While this configuration is functional I regret creating a new storage
pool in /home.
Out of curiosity, why?
In part because this directory was getting in the way of synchronizing
user directories betwe
I have a question about the network and Centos 7
I am experimenting with two C7 installations:
- On relatively new hardware, configured with fixed IP address in IPV4 only
- on top of Windows, using VMWare, sharing my windows connection via
Vmware's bridge with IPV4 only.
On both configurations
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:27 AM, david wrote:
> I have a question about the network and Centos 7
>
> I am experimenting with two C7 installations:
> - On relatively new hardware, configured with fixed IP address in IPV4 only
> - on top of Windows, using VMWare, sharing my windows connection
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: den 8 maj 2015 17:12
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution
>
> On 5/7/2015 11:44 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> > May I ask what you
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
> Sent: den 11 maj 2015 07:49
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution
>
> > Main Config:
> >Schedule:
> > FullPeriod: 27.9
> >
On 5/10/2015 11:03 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
How did you get away with using 27,9 on Fullperiod?8-)
I'm seeing "Error: No save due to errors" and "Error: FullPeriod must be a
real-valued number", unless I change the value to e.g. 27.
This is on BPC v3.2.1.
27.9 not 27,9 (point, not comma).
--
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: den 11 maj 2015 08:19
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution
>
> On 5/10/2015 11:03 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> > How did you get a
27 matches
Mail list logo
