Hey guys,
Thanks for your input! Both examples you gave worked, and I'll do some
reading on the suggested subjects!! Just a heads up that it worked. I
appreciate the clarification!
Thanks,
Tim
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 06/08/2015 10:12 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
some rpmforge packages may even conflict with the base distro. What do you
need in rpmforge that isn't available from base, rpmfusion, or epel? The
only thing I know of are some kmod packages from elrepo, and I have the
elrepo.repo configuration so tha
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 13:26 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do
> not play well together and that if I use both,
> epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority.
> Alas I had it the other way around.
> rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity.
On 06/09/15 15:41, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 6/9/2015 12:33 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
>> Listen, it's far simpler than that. Call Microsoft and tell them that
>> you resized a file system with a third party tool and now your file
>> system is corrupt and you'd like them to support you. Await th
On Jun 9, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
>
> On 06/09/2015 03:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> What do you
>> need in rpmforge that isn't available from base, rpmfusion, or epel?
>
> Do you happen to know of somewhere other than rpmforge where I can find
> hexedit and gqview for el6 ?
On 06/09/2015 03:42 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us
wrote:
What do you
need in rpmforge that isn't available from base, rpmfusion, or epel?
Do you happen to know of somewhere other than rpmforge where I can find
hexedit and gqview for el6 ? Epel has them for el5, but not el6.
Fortunately, installing the
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do
> not play well together and that if I use both,
> epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority.
> Alas I had it the other way around.
> rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity.
> I no longer need audacity,
> but w
On Jun 8, 2015, at 8:16 PM, g wrote:
>
> On 06/08/2015 09:11 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 6/8/2015 6:29 PM, Peter wrote:
>>> You can thank Fedora for making that rather pointless change and
>>> breaking that capability.
>>
>> that 'capability' was a holdover of the 1980s when disks were
>> me
On 6/9/2015 12:33 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
Listen, it's far simpler than that. Call Microsoft and tell them that you
resized a file system with a third party tool and now your file system is
corrupt and you'd like them to support you. Await the click and awkward
silence.
hey, I'd hang u
- Original Message -
| On Monday, 08 June 2015 at @07:06 zulu, Gordon Messmer wrote:
|
| > Why? If you use gparted (ntfsprogs, under the covers, IIRC), the system
| > will chkdsk on the next boot. No such requirement exists with Microsoft's
| > tools
|
|
|
| That's not been my experie
On 6/9/2015 11:26 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do
not play well together and that if I use both,
epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority.
Alas I had it the other way around.
rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity.
I no longer need audac
I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do
not play well together and that if I use both,
epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority.
Alas I had it the other way around.
rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity.
I no longer need audacity,
but would like to fix the situation before
The newly-released kernel v2.6.32-504.23.4.el6 includes the back-ported
SHA256-SSSE3 driver.
Why is the generic version of the SHA256 driver selected at runtime instead of
the SSSE3 version on this x86_64 system?
Yes, my CPU does support the SSSE3 instruction set, and the use of SHA256 is
in
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 09:16:07AM -0700, JD wrote:
> The screen image I took with my camera can be viewed at
> https://www.sendspace.com/file/4828ej
>
> The questions I have are:
> why VNC ??? VNC is a horribly insecure protocol.
> Why would I want someone from outside viewing my installation?
>
On Tue, June 9, 2015 10:51 am, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 06/08/2015 06:29 PM, Peter wrote:
>> On 06/09/2015 12:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 6/8/2015 5:08 PM, g wrote:
ie, partition for boot, partition for swap, partition for /,
partition
home, partition for usr, partition for var,
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "m roth"
Aan: "CentOS mailing list"
Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 juni 2015 16:36:40
Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:51:46AM +0200, johan.vermeul...@telenet.be
> wrote:
>>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 09:16:07AM -0700, JD wrote:
> I did see your post.
>
>
> So, even though the sha256sum was perfect on the iso file and on the DVD,
> it failed to install.
> I then used a usb flash drive and booted the flash drive to do the install.
> It also failed.
> The screen image I t
I did see your post.
So, even though the sha256sum was perfect on the iso file and on the DVD,
it failed to install.
I then used a usb flash drive and booted the flash drive to do the install.
It also failed.
The screen image I took with my camera can be viewed at
https://www.sendspace.com/file/4
On 06/08/2015 06:29 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 06/09/2015 12:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 6/8/2015 5:08 PM, g wrote:
>>> ie, partition for boot, partition for swap, partition for /, partition
>>> home, partition for usr, partition for var, partition for home2,
>>> partition for what ever.
>>
>>
>
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:51:46AM +0200, johan.vermeul...@telenet.be
> wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> on the latest installs I've done, on 2 different types of Latitude
>> laptops, with 3 different wireless cars, of Centos7 and Mate desktop,
>> it looks to me like NetworkManager is
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:51:46AM +0200, johan.vermeul...@telenet.be wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> on the latest installs I've done, on 2 different types of Latitude laptops,
> with 3 different wireless cars, of Centos7 and Mate desktop,
> it looks to me like NetworkManager is nog managing wireless.
On 06/08/2015 08:24 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:32:05PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 6/8/2015 5:21 PM, michael wright wrote:
>>> Hi I am running windows 7 professional and the lastest centos7 x86 now if I
>>> wish to partition the hard since I have 2TB harddrive what
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "johan vermeulen7"
Aan: "CentOS mailing list"
Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 juni 2015 11:51:46
Onderwerp: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs
Hello All,
on the latest installs I've done, on 2 different types of Latitude laptops,
with
Hello All,
on the latest installs I've done, on 2 different types of Latitude laptops,
with 3 different wireless cars, of Centos7 and Mate desktop,
it looks to me like NetworkManager is nog managing wireless.
When clicking the nm icon in the top right corner, I'm not seeing access
points.
W
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:07:44PM +1030, michael wright wrote:
>
> Hi Fred sounds like you know what your doing for sure
well, I've done this before.
>
> this is my harddrive My C: Dive NTFS 1.13TB Used 45.74GB Unused 1.09 TB
> System Primary
>
> do I need to to create two partitions o
In article <55761c28@imag.fr>,
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
>
> On 06/09/2015 12:48 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> > On 06/09/2015 12:33 AM, t...@softins.co.uk (Tony Mountifield) wrote:
> >> In article ,
> >> Tony Mountifield wrote:
> >>> When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS
27 matches
Mail list logo
