> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: den 29 juni 2015 19:40
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home
> server
>
> On 06/29/2015 06:46 AM, So
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
> Sent: den 29 juni 2015 17:25
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home
> server
>
> > The WiFi solution I us
Thank you Kahlil for your reply.
I made few perl changes, uninstalled CPAN, removed the .cpan dir, and
reinstalled, and ran 'install CPAN' and everything looked much better. That is,
no failures. The last part of the output was;
t/97-mock.t ... ok
t/97-process_options.t ...
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> > Anaconda on Fedora live media installs uses:
> >
> > rsync -pogAXtlHrDx
>
> Looks like this is the same as -aAXHx
>
> The cap X is for extended attributes.
>
>
Mr. Murphy, thanks for
CPAN is a core module which can be tricky to update on the RedHat based
systems.
Suggest investigating:
local::lib
App::cpanminus
Pinto
If you need a newer Perl, check out www.softwarecollections.org.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:/
Am 29.06.2015 um 19:40 schrieb Gordon Messmer :
> On 06/29/2015 06:46 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> Even considering a minimal CentOS install, is that still less minimal than
>> e.g. Smoothwall or Ipcop?
>
> Yes, a minimal install of CentOS is probably larger (less minimal) than a
> specialized distri
It's not a good idea to update CPAN and/or install modules from CPAN into
the OS-installed perl. Use rpm packages from yum. Many can be found in
the standard CentOS repo and EPEL has many as well. Take a look at
perlbrew if you really need a new version of perl for some reason. If you
don't rea
Hello List,
Running CentOS Linux release 7.0.1406 (Core), and trying to update CPAN from
version 1.98 to version 2.10, but it fails.
t/97-process_setup_options.t .. ok
t/97-return_values.t .. 6/10
# Failed test 'blib/script/cpan -j t/97-lib_cpan1/CPAN/Config.pm
Local::Prereq::Fails'
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Anaconda on Fedora live media installs uses:
>
> rsync -pogAXtlHrDx
Looks like this is the same as -aAXHx
The cap X is for extended attributes.
--
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Matt Garman wrote:
Take a look at Devtoolset, I think this will give you what you want:
https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/
Thanks much.
It looks like what I want.
Also, I think I'll look at the Modules environment
in case a convient solution
Anaconda on Fedora live media installs uses:
rsync -pogAXtlHrDx
There is at least one equivalent that's shorter, probably with -a
representing about half of those.
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/
- Original Message -
| Take a look at Devtoolset, I think this will give you what you want:
| https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/
|
|
|
| On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Michael Hennebry
| wrote:
| > gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11) is a bit o
We have Centos 5.8 on LInux server.I setup /etc/login.defs following:
PASS_MAX_DAYS 3
PASS_MIN_DAYS 0
PASS_MIN_LEN 8
PASS_WARN_AGE 1
after that I chack user password policy and it show:# chage -l user1
Last password change : Jun 29, 2015
Password expires
Thanks Mr. Roth!
That's nice and methodical.
I do like how you can revert by simply remounting the previous directories.
I'm going to try both.
I'm still hopeful that a simple tar -xf server.tgz into the chrooted "/" is
possible.
At linuxquestions.org, one user suggests it can be done by exempting
Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> Hi CentOS folk,
>
> In an RPM post-install script, is it possible to know the previous
> version number, and the new version number of a package if it's an update?
>
> I need to know this, because for a certain package, if updating from
> version 1.x to 2.x, I need to run
On 6/29/2015 11:56 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Does a standard CentOS 7 repository have a newer version?
Does a CentOS 7-compatible repository have a newer version?
el 7 comes with gcc 4.8.3
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
___
CentO
Mike wrote:
> Current Installation: CentOS 7.1503 with SerNet Samba 4 ver. 4.1.17
> configured as Active Directory Domain Controller.
> Current Installation: HP Workstation with dual Xeon quadcore cpu's and 4 x
> SATA hard drives NOT configured in RAID array.
>
> New Installation: CentOS 7.1503 min
Take a look at Devtoolset, I think this will give you what you want:
https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Michael Hennebry
wrote:
> gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11) is a bit old.
> There have been major changes since the
gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11) is a bit old.
There have been major changes since then.
I'd like a newer version.
If I have to, I expect that I can install from source.
I'd rather not.
Is there a CentOS 6-compatible repository
from which I can get a newer version?
Does a standard Cen
> I get good results with IPCop on an older box. I happened to already
> have my WAP set up, similar to David, with ethernet cable into my
> Netgear gigabit switch. But IPCop has a zone now for wifi and I could
> hook it into my IPCop and and get all it's benefits.
>
> I haven't bothered because I'
On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 08:17 -0700, david wrote:
>
> >
> >Yup. For, um, about a dozen years, I ran RH 7.1,7.2, 7.3, and eventually 9
> >on an old box that was nothing but a firewall router. I was seriously
> >paranoid - no gcc or any development tools, no X, not much of anything. To
> >the best of
Current Installation: CentOS 7.1503 with SerNet Samba 4 ver. 4.1.17
configured as Active Directory Domain Controller.
Current Installation: HP Workstation with dual Xeon quadcore cpu's and 4 x
SATA hard drives NOT configured in RAID array.
New Installation: CentOS 7.1503 minimal install
New Instal
On 06/29/2015 06:46 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Even considering a minimal CentOS install, is that still less minimal than
e.g. Smoothwall or Ipcop?
Yes, a minimal install of CentOS is probably larger (less minimal) than
a specialized distribution.
In my world, security has a price and, and that
On 6/29/2015 7:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
At some point, I may just get a PI, and run CentOS, or some
firewall/router distro, though that would mean not having WiFi for guests.
I'm using a UniFi AP for my wireless, actually, I have two of them at
home for full coverage. it works SO much s
On 06/28/2015 03:49 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
From several sources, code, the stock CentOS iptables I've cobbled the
following /etc/sysconfig/iptables; while it works, I suspect that
there are holes:
# Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall
# Manual customization of this file is n
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Tris Hoar wrote:
On 29/06/2015 16:59, Max Pyziur wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 6/28/2015 3:49 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> > I also seem to need to load
> > iptable_nat
> > nf_nat_ftp
> >
> > via rc.local
> >
> > Is this correct?
>
> only
On 29/06/2015 16:59, Max Pyziur wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, John R Pierce wrote:
On 6/28/2015 3:49 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
I also seem to need to load
iptable_nat
nf_nat_ftp
via rc.local
Is this correct?
only if you're running some Linux build from the 1990s.
nothing on RHEL/CentOS sho
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, John R Pierce wrote:
On 6/28/2015 3:49 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
I also seem to need to load
iptable_nat
nf_nat_ftp
via rc.local
Is this correct?
only if you're running some Linux build from the 1990s.
nothing on RHEL/CentOS should need anything in rc.local
Then w
david wrote:
> At 07:43 AM 6/29/2015, you wrote:
>>James B. Byrne wrote:
>> > On Mon, June 29, 2015 02:14, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> > OS 6?
>> >>
>> >> Please note: I'm not criticizing, just curious about the argument
>> >> behind using a regular OS to do firewall-stuff.
>> >
>> > Maintenance.
>> >
>>
At 07:43 AM 6/29/2015, you wrote:
James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Mon, June 29, 2015 02:14, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> OS 6?
>>
>> Please note: I'm not criticizing, just curious about the argument
>> behind using a regular OS to do firewall-stuff.
>
> Maintenance.
>
> A consistent set of expectations does wo
James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Mon, June 29, 2015 02:14, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> OS 6?
>>
>> Please note: I'm not criticizing, just curious about the argument
>> behind using a regular OS to do firewall-stuff.
>
> Maintenance.
>
> A consistent set of expectations does wonders for debugging odd-ball
> occur
On 06/28/2015 05:11 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
My motivation for asking this
question was for making an EPEL package that can work for most people
without breaking their installations (especially if they have unattended
yum updates, like with yum-cron).
Bear in mind that one of the reasons peopl
Am 29.06.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Sorin Srbu :
>>
>>> Please note: I'm not criticizing, just curious about the argument
>>> behind using a regular OS to do firewall-stuff.
>>>
>>
>> Maintenance.
>>
>> A consistent set of expectations does wonders for debugging odd-ball
>> occurrences. Why learn t
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of James B. Byrne
> Sent: den 29 juni 2015 15:10
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home
> server
>
>
> > Please note: I'm not
On Mon, June 29, 2015 02:14, Sorin Srbu wrote:
OS 6?
>
> Please note: I'm not criticizing, just curious about the argument
> behind using a regular OS to do firewall-stuff.
>
Maintenance.
A consistent set of expectations does wonders for debugging odd-ball
occurrences. Why learn the idiosyncras
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
I have no idea of the current dependency problem. I think your original
problem was caused by mv'ing files from an nfs share to /etc which
maintained the context. And SELinux prevented puppet from accessing
nfs_t type. If you had just run restorecon on the object it would have
set it back to the
Am 29.06.2015 um 02:11 schrieb Anand Buddhdev :
> On 29/06/15 01:07, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
>
>> On 29 June 2015 at 07:37, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>>> so a regex looking for "system:" vs "system {" should nicely delineate
>>> these. I dunno, I might even put that into the conversion utility a
At Mon, 29 Jun 2015 06:14:33 + CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Content-Language: en-US
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> > Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
> > Sent: den 29 juni 2015 08:11
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subj
On 6/29/2015 12:04 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Gotcha'. Fewer watts may be worth it in the long run, as this is a device
that's always on for obvious reasons.
depends entirely on your performance requirements. the APU has no fans
AND no vents, the case sheet metal is the heatsink. this means it
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: den 29 juni 2015 09:03
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home
> server
>
> On 6/28/2015 11:50 PM, Sorin
On 6/28/2015 11:50 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
That DIY Kit was pretty cool, thanks for the info!
I note everyone is moving over to the Intel Avoton/Rangley 'system on a
chip', this is the Xeon Atom C2xx8 series, like this...
http://store.netgate.com/ADI/RCC-VE-2440-board.aspx
(other versions of Ra
42 matches
Mail list logo