Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Ashish Yadav
Hi, It could be due to some dependency issue aslo, please see the error logs for more information. --Regards Ashishkumar S. Yadav ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Luigi Rosa
Tim Dunphy wrote on 28/08/2015 00:18: And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site I'm serving has permissions for the apache user. Yet some of the files are throwing a 404 error in a browser even tho they are clearly present and accounted for on the file system. Put

[CentOS] Cisco UCS HBA Firmware - 1.6.0.12(b)

2015-08-27 Thread Saravanan Arumugam
Hello, Any idea when Cisco UCS Firmware Package will be included in centos Patching ? I had planned for Ontab storage upgarde, hence needed this level firmware version on CentOS Any help and leads will help me to plan the upgrade. Thanks ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Peter
On 08/28/2015 10:18 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hey guys, > > Just have a question about apache. Hoping to get an opinion on this. > > I've just setup a site under apache 2.4. > > And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site I'm > serving has permissions for the apache use

Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Barry Brimer
Well those errors are pulled from the Chrome developer tools. I notice if I do a GET on that file using both all lower case as well as the upper case that's in the URL I get the same result: [root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# GET http://stage.theshopatmycompanystudios.com/mycopmanyStore/images/alt

Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Philip Manuel
On 28/08/15 09:56, Tim Dunphy wrote: Hey Rodrigo, Thanks for your reply. Well those errors are pulled from the Chrome developer tools. I notice if I do a GET on that file using both all lower case as well as the upper case that's in the URL I get the same result: [root@aozwsls00019la apac

Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Tim Dunphy
Hey Rodrigo, Thanks for your reply. Well those errors are pulled from the Chrome developer tools. I notice if I do a GET on that file using both all lower case as well as the upper case that's in the URL I get the same result: [root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# GET http://stage.theshopatmycompanys

Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Rodrigo Maia
Hi apache on GNU/Linux is case-sensitive samples: /var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg on browser : (index):1 GET http://stage.theshop

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Nataraj
On 08/27/2015 07:29 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Gary Stainburn wrote: >> Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have >> started again: > > > A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND mailhost; > that is, if emails come from a domain, and through

Re: [CentOS] virt-manager with dhcpd running on same machine

2015-08-27 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 08/27/2015 01:43 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: If I have dhcpd running on my machine, and I wish to run virt-manager on the same machine How do I do that - its telling me an error for starting the network and the error is that DHCPD is already running - port in use. I'm mostly sure that if you w

[CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Tim Dunphy
Hey guys, Just have a question about apache. Hoping to get an opinion on this. I've just setup a site under apache 2.4. And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site I'm serving has permissions for the apache user. Yet some of the files are throwing a 404 error in a bro

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 Bind and DLZ support

2015-08-27 Thread James A. Peltier
- Original Message - | | | On 08/27/2015 12:49 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: | > - Original Message - | > | Is DLZ support enabled in the Centos 7 bind? | > | | > | building a Samba/sernet AD, and this looks to be the best way to handle | > | the DNS needs of the AD. | > | | > | t

[CentOS] virt-manager with dhcpd running on same machine

2015-08-27 Thread Jerry Geis
If I have dhcpd running on my machine, and I wish to run virt-manager on the same machine How do I do that - its telling me an error for starting the network and the error is that DHCPD is already running - port in use. Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mail

[CentOS] C6 HP lt4112 Gobi 4G Module

2015-08-27 Thread Patrick Bervoets
Anyone got an HP lt4112 Gobi 4G Module working in C6? Care to give me some pointers about how/where to begin? Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] C7 bind-sdb

2015-08-27 Thread Robert Moskowitz
This seems to be just a stub with 3 READMEs? # locate bind-sdb /usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4 /usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4/INSTALL.ldap /usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4/README.ldap /usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4/README.sdb_pgsql Unless it is putting files elsewhere. These readmes are dated long ago

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 - changing resolv.conf by hand gets overwritten by rebooting

2015-08-27 Thread Pete Geenhuizen
I think that you want to create /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks with this, for more info do a search on dhclient-enter-hooks # vi /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks make_resolv_conf(){ : } Pete On 08/27/15 15:36, George wrote: given machine with C6 x86_64 (seen on C 6.6 but also before and probably s

[CentOS] centos 6 - changing resolv.conf by hand gets overwritten by rebooting

2015-08-27 Thread George
given machine with C6 x86_64 (seen on C 6.6 but also before and probably still present on C6.7) only 1 interface, there is dhcp on this network (for kickstarting) but the machines have static ip's, and NO networkmanager installed contents of resolv.conf search some.domain.here nameserver x.x.x

Re: [CentOS] please block user - OT, very

2015-08-27 Thread m . roth
g wrote: > On 08/27/15 13:07, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 8/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote: >>> we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of >>> a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to >>> maintain. >> >> PLEASE tell me this whole post is tongue-in-che

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread g
On 08/27/15 13:32, John R Pierce wrote: > On 8/27/2015 11:30 AM, g wrote: >> i have invited Alice to continue this on moz gen. how about you? > > I am neither on that list nor have any interest in joining it. > . fine. end of discussion. have a great day. mine has been most enjoyable so far.

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread John R Pierce
On 8/27/2015 11:30 AM, g wrote: i have invited Alice to continue this on moz gen. how about you? I am neither on that list nor have any interest in joining it. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.or

[CentOS] C7, nfs issue on restart

2015-08-27 Thread m . roth
Hi, folks, We're having an issue on a server reboot after update; nfs doesn't come up. systemctl tells us it's enabled, dead. We restart the service with systemctl, and there's no problem at all. I was just looking in the logfiles from the reboot (grep -i nfs /var/log/messages), and the *on

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread g
On 08/27/15 13:07, John R Pierce wrote: > On 8/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote: >> we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of >> a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to >> maintain. > > PLEASE tell me this whole post is tongue-in-cheek. > . that is

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread g
On 08/27/15 13:00, Alice Wonder wrote: > > > On 08/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote: >> >> >> On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote: On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: <> > *sigh* > And they're probably sent by a script running on the

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread John R Pierce
On 8/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote: we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to maintain. PLEASE tell me this whole post is tongue-in-cheek. nayways, none of this has ANYthing to do with CENTOS and real

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Alice Wonder
On 08/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote: On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote: On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote: On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: <> *sigh* And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat, 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread g
On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote: >> On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> <> >> >>> *sigh* >>> And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat, >>> 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way >>> >> . >> i seri

Re: [CentOS] a peculiar LVM failure on CentOS 6 run as a VMware 5.5 guest

2015-08-27 Thread Boris Epstein
Hello Leonard, Thank you very much for your response. While it most likely is related the problem description provided at the link seems a bit vague, and tips on how to resolve the issue seem to be even more so. I have done some research and in the process stumbled upon this: http://linoxide.co

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Alice Wonder
On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote: On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: <> *sigh* And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat, 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way . i seriously doubt it. several of the responses could not have been fr

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 Bind and DLZ support

2015-08-27 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 08/27/2015 12:49 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: - Original Message - | Is DLZ support enabled in the Centos 7 bind? | | building a Samba/sernet AD, and this looks to be the best way to handle | the DNS needs of the AD. | | thanks. | | Also any web tools for managing a mysql (mariaDB?) D

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 Bind and DLZ support

2015-08-27 Thread James A. Peltier
- Original Message - | Is DLZ support enabled in the Centos 7 bind? | | building a Samba/sernet AD, and this looks to be the best way to handle | the DNS needs of the AD. | | thanks. | | Also any web tools for managing a mysql (mariaDB?) DLZ backend? Web, as | my AD will not have a GUI;

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread g
On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: <> > *sigh* > And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat, > 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way > . i seriously doubt it. several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. -- peace

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Always Learning
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:35 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Me too: I started receiving them from different IP (with much longer > delay, so they do add "improvements" to their setup). This IP, has neither > DNS A record nor DNS PTR record, but has DNS MX record. One can use these > (have your MX

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Thu, August 27, 2015 9:29 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Gary Stainburn wrote: >> Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have started again: > > > A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND mailhost; > that is, if emails come from a domain, and t

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Robert Wolfe
Now see, I run a spam filter (run on CentOS, by the way *smiles*) and I have several friends' domain emails running through it. It has a pretty good filter rate, too for being all open source. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behal

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread m . roth
g wrote: > On 08/27/15 07:11, Gary Stainburn wrote:> Bad news Guys, they've just > moved > the emails to somewhere else and have started again: > <> >> From: Caylian Curtis > <> > not true. she has been at that site for a while. > > i received 1st email from her and Julie Anna just after i posted

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread m . roth
Gary Stainburn wrote: > Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have > started again: A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND mailhost; that is, if emails come from a domain, and through one mailhost, then block the domain. If many domains, and

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Lamar Owen
On 08/26/2015 09:01 PM, Always Learning wrote: I've blocked the spammer's host name (*.loverhearts.com) on my Exim. Shouldn't your organisation, and others too, do the same or similar ? That is of course up to the individual organization. I use several DNSBLs, and I did not receive any of the

[CentOS] Centos 7 Bind and DLZ support

2015-08-27 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Is DLZ support enabled in the Centos 7 bind? building a Samba/sernet AD, and this looks to be the best way to handle the DNS needs of the AD. thanks. Also any web tools for managing a mysql (mariaDB?) DLZ backend? Web, as my AD will not have a GUI; nor should I be doing this on the AD direct

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread g
On 08/27/15 07:11, Gary Stainburn wrote:> Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have > started again: <> > From: Caylian Curtis <> not true. she has been at that site for a while. i received 1st email from her and Julie Anna just after i posted to this thread. i w

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Gary Stainburn
Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have started again: Return-path: <014f6ef4427c-8079d442-fc1e-4116-841a-ba157163def8-000...@amazonses.com> Envelope-to: g...@ringways.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:39:10 +0100 Received: from a8-81.smtp-out.amazonses

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Gary Stainburn
On Wednesday 26 August 2015 20:11:20 g wrote: > so the only harm is spam, which i now have going to my Junk folder. > That is not the only harm. These people are very good and very effective confidence tricksters and are experts at getting vulnerable people to send them money which they usually

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Gary Stainburn
On Thursday 27 August 2015 01:40:21 zep wrote: > digital ocean finally replied (at least to me): > > Hi there, > > I'm sorry about this. We gave our customer time to resolve the issue, > and he hasn't done so, so we've blocked his ability to send email, pending > further action if necessar