I am from application back ground. I never worked on Linux. I follow some
steps which posted on internet.
I update Kernel from centos rescue cd option. But boot did not update.Is it
a bug in Centos?
On Sunday, November 22, 2015, zep > wrote:
>
>
> On 11/21/2015 12:57 PM, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
On 11/21/2015 12:57 PM, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
> Boot from DVD/USB. Select rescue installed (on centos7 or vmlinuz
> rescue on older), select configure network and mount installed, then
> "chroot /mnt/sysimage" and yum install kernel... This should do...
>
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Si
Boot from DVD/USB. Select rescue installed (on centos7 or vmlinuz
rescue on older), select configure network and mount installed, then
"chroot /mnt/sysimage" and yum install kernel... This should do...
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Siva Prasad Nath
wrote:
> My boot folder has only rescue vm. H
On 21 November 2015 at 12:05, Siva Prasad Nath
wrote:
> My boot folder has only rescue vm. How to get actual vm?
>
>
>
> Shiva Prasad Nath
> 92981134
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Eero Volotinen
> wrote:
>
> > Using rescue mode or some other rescuecd..
> >
> > Eero
> > 21.11.2015 6.41 ip
My boot folder has only rescue vm. How to get actual vm?
Shiva Prasad Nath
92981134
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Eero Volotinen
wrote:
> Using rescue mode or some other rescuecd..
>
> Eero
> 21.11.2015 6.41 ip. "Siva Prasad Nath"
> kirjoitti:
>
> > Hi,
> > From yesterday my server was d
Using rescue mode or some other rescuecd..
Eero
21.11.2015 6.41 ip. "Siva Prasad Nath"
kirjoitti:
> Hi,
> From yesterday my server was down.
> It was showing only rescue menu. I copy grub.cfg to grub.cfg.old. Replace
> grub.cfg from another server.
> Now I cannot start server. How to revert back
Hi,
>From yesterday my server was down.
It was showing only rescue menu. I copy grub.cfg to grub.cfg.old. Replace
grub.cfg from another server.
Now I cannot start server. How to revert back grub.cfg and how to put vm in
the boot folder?
Thanks in advance.
Shiva
___
On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 14:38 +, Edward Ned Harvey (centos) wrote:
> According to these, centos 6 and rhel 6 are limited to 16G of ram. But I
> currently have a rhel6 system with 128G, so ... Don't know what to think
> about that...
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product
> and
> https://
On Sat, November 21, 2015 8:29 am, Edward Ned Harvey (centos) wrote:
> A few years ago, I vaguely recall some issue with RHEL needing a special
> license or something like that, if you had more than a certain amount of
> CPU's or a certain amount of RAM.
>
> Does Centos work fine for 2 CPU's, 16 c
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey (centos)
>
> According to these, centos 6 and rhel 6 are limited to 16G of ram. But I
> currently have a rhel6 system with 128G, so ... Don't know what to think
> about that...
Gaah! Sorry. I lo
On 11/21/2015 03:38 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (centos) wrote:
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey (centos)
A few years ago, I vaguely recall some issue with RHEL needing a special
license or something like that, if you had more than a cer
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey (centos)
>
> A few years ago, I vaguely recall some issue with RHEL needing a special
> license or something like that, if you had more than a certain amount of
> CPU's or a certain amount of RAM.
A few years ago, I vaguely recall some issue with RHEL needing a special
license or something like that, if you had more than a certain amount of CPU's
or a certain amount of RAM.
Does Centos work fine for 2 CPU's, 16 cores, 32 threads, and 256 G of ram?
Centos6 specifically.
__
Tim Evans wrote:
>
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/43.0beta/system-requirements/
Mozilla still support GTK2 as a build option, so I suspect when Redhat switch
to Firefox ESR 45 (March 2016) they will provide a GTK2 build
James Pearson
___
CentO
14 matches
Mail list logo
