Re: [CentOS] tsocks or equivalent for CentOS 7

On 12/8/2015 2:56 PM, Leroy Tennison wrote: Does such exist? I looked for dante and couldn't find that. I found and tried using a version from CentOS 6 but it didn't work. If anyone can point me to an rpm (or set of same) I would most certainly appreciate it. Thanks. this? http://tsocks.sour

[CentOS] tsocks or equivalent for CentOS 7

Does such exist? I looked for dante and couldn't find that. I found and tried using a version from CentOS 6 but it didn't work. If anyone can point me to an rpm (or set of same) I would most certainly appreciate it. Thanks. Confidentiality Notice | This email and any included attachments may b

[CentOS] CentOS 6 pci audio card not enabled

CentOS 6 up-to-date 2.6.32-573.8.1.el6.x86_64 Gigabyte GA-Z68P-DS3 on-board audio BIOS disabled. Intel I5 Pny 550Ti video Envy 24HT pci audio module I want to use the fiber in/out of the audio card, but it is not listed in System/Preferences/Sound/Hardware, only the HDMI is available. It was

Re: [CentOS] openvpn + routing

default route normally is 0.0.0.0/0 to overwrite default you can - erase the existing an add the new one: this change is to do vice versa: an start up and shut down; so you need an installation dependend information about the default Gateway. Alternativly you can add two routes: 0.0.0.0 netm

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Richard > wrote: > > > >> Date: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 09:17:20 -0700 >> From: Wes James >> > > You wouldn't happen to have an entry for mirrorlist.centos.org in > your /etc/hosts file for some reason? > > Also, what is on the line for the (uncommented

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:24:34AM -0700, Wes James wrote: >> > > ... >> >> nslookup works: >> >> Non-authoritative answer: >> Name:mirrorlist.centos.org >> Address: 108.61.16.227 >> Name:mirrorlist.centos.org >>

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:24:34AM -0700, Wes James wrote: >> > > ... >> >> nslookup works: >> >> Non-authoritative answer: >> Name:mirrorlist.centos.org >> Address: 108.61.16.227 >> Name:mirrorlist.centos.org >>

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> Date: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 09:17:20 -0700 > From: Wes James > >> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:24:34AM -0700, Wes James wrote: >>> >> >> ... >>> >>> nslookup works: >>> >>> Non-authoritative answer: >>> Name: mir

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:24:34AM -0700, Wes James wrote: >> > > ... >> >> nslookup works: >> >> Non-authoritative answer: >> Name:mirrorlist.centos.org >> Address: 108.61.16.227 >> Name:mirrorlist.centos.org >>

Re: [CentOS] Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:45:10AM -0500, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > What I want to know is, why is CentOS doing things differently than RedHat? > Who made this decision, and was there any consideration given to making > such a highly visible departure? When did CentOS decide to fork away from > RHEL

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:24:34AM -0700, Wes James wrote: >> > > ... >> >> nslookup works: >> >> Non-authoritative answer: >> Name:mirrorlist.centos.org >> Address: 108.61.16.227 >> Name:mirrorlist.centos.org >>

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

Another option I tried was service iptables stop just to see if there was a firewall rule causing an issue. But yum update still fails: yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, presto Setting up Update Process Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Could not retrieve mirrorlist http://m

Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot]

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:46:58AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: > > This is roughly true, although "downstream" RHEL makes its own > > decisions about many things. If you (Mark, or anyone else) would like > > to make this different in the future, getting involved with Fedora > > Server is a good wa

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

Hi, On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:24:34AM -0700, Wes James wrote: > ... > > nslookup works: > > Non-authoritative answer: > Name: mirrorlist.centos.org > Address: 108.61.16.227 > Name: mirrorlist.centos.org > Address: 84.22.180.89 > Name: mirrorlist.centos.org > Address: 88.150.173.218 > > but

Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot]

On Mon, December 7, 2015 13:41, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:03:50AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:50:38PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> > For laptops, great. For anything else, not so much. For example, >> > it's supposed to be an *ENTERPRISE

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 7, 2015, at 10:57 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: >> >> [base] >> name=CentOS-$releasever - Base >> #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=os&infra=$infra > finally something I can check for you > my 6.x machine does not have the trailing &infra=$infr

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 7:45 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 12/07/2015 11:50 PM, Wes James wrote: >> >>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 10:02 PM, Jake Shipton wrote: >>> >>> Wes James wrote: > On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:37 PM, Wes James wrote: > >> >> On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:23 PM, Wes Jame

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

On 12/07/2015 11:50 PM, Wes James wrote: > >> On Dec 7, 2015, at 10:02 PM, Jake Shipton wrote: >> >> Wes James wrote: >>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:37 PM, Wes James wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:23 PM, Wes James > wrote: > > >> On Dec 7, 2

Re: [CentOS] yum errors

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:23:29PM -0700, Wes James wrote: > > > On Dec 7, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Wes James wrote: > > > > > > I finally just did yum update on this box (actually 6.3) and now it is 6.7. > > During the update it created a CentOS-Base.repo.rpmnew file. I renamed my > > current on

Re: [CentOS] Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL

On 07/12/15 23:42, J Martin Rushton wrote: > So if we are to give up on the point release does that mean I don't > have to update my machines until CentOS 8 comes along? ;-) on the flip side, ignore the point in time, assume you run /7/ and need to update as you go along, with the YYmm telling you

Re: [CentOS] Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:42 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 7 Dec 2015 23:43, "J Martin Rushton" > wrote: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 07/12/15 22:37, Warren Young wrote: > > > On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote: > > >> > > >> On Mon, Dec 07, 20

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 130, Issue 2

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ.