Hello Patrick,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:10:07 +0100 Patrick Bervoets
wrote:
> Op 14-12-15 om 23:54 schreef Scott Robbins:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:43:54PM +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> >> I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and
> >> LO 4.4 rpms from
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:10:27 +0100
Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> Do you guys work in gnome or KDE?
Mate.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/l
Hello Patrick,
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:43:54 +0100 Patrick Bervoets
wrote:
> I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO
> 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black).
> Anyone been able to use a higher version of LO?
I had no probl
Op 14-12-15 om 22:09 schreef Johan Vermeulen:
Op 14-dec.-2015 22:02 schreef Frank Cox:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:43:54 +0100
Patrick Bervoets wrote:
I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO
4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black
Op 14-12-15 om 23:54 schreef Scott Robbins:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:43:54PM +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO
4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black).
Anyone been able to use a higher ve
> Date: Monday, December 14, 2015 20:38:23 -0700
> From: Wes James
>
>
>> On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Johnny Hughes
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/14/2015 05:46 PM, Wes James wrote:
>>>
On Dec 14, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Johnny Hughes
wrote:
See this announce mail here:
h
> On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> On 12/14/2015 05:46 PM, Wes James wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 14, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> See this announce mail here:
>>>
>>> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-December/021518.html
>>
>>
>>
>> I
> On Dec 14, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> On 12/14/2015 05:53 PM, Wes James wrote:
>> Just side note, when I boot with 7.2 now it has (Core) with Debugging before
>> (Core) now. All the others are the other way around.
>>
>
> Known issue, see:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/doc
Latest CentOS: 7.2-1511
Latest Win10: Version 1511
Hmm. :)
Cheers,
Zube
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 12/14/2015 3:46 PM, Wes James wrote:
I just updated to 7.2 from 7.1. I did lsb_release -a and it says 7.2.1511. I
haven’t rebooted yet, which items would run with new binaries, anything that
isn’t running yet? Ssay I had apache running, it wouldn’t pick up new apache
until a reboot, right
On 12/14/2015 05:53 PM, Wes James wrote:
> Just side note, when I boot with 7.2 now it has (Core) with Debugging before
> (Core) now. All the others are the other way around.
>
Known issue, see:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/7.2_Release_Notes/kno
Just side note, when I boot with 7.2 now it has (Core) with Debugging before
(Core) now. All the others are the other way around.
Also, on my 2011 iMac, the 7.2 kernel won’t boot. I had to go back to the
latest I had with 7.1. This has happened in the past, but some time later a
newer kerne
On 12/14/2015 05:46 PM, Wes James wrote:
>
>> On Dec 14, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> See this announce mail here:
>>
>> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-December/021518.html
>
>
>
> I just updated to 7.2 from 7.1. I did lsb_release -a and it says 7.2.15
> On Dec 14, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> See this announce mail here:
>
> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-December/021518.html
I just updated to 7.2 from 7.1. I did lsb_release -a and it says 7.2.1511. I
haven’t rebooted yet, which items would run wi
On 12/14/2015 04:53 PM, ken wrote:
> On 12/14/2015 05:29 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:16:42 -0500 ken wrote:
>>
>>> How? I downloaded two (larger) of the three Centos 7 ISOs I could
>>> find... the only ones I could find. (I listed on names of the ISOs
>>> in my first post to th
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:43:54PM +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO
> 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black).
> Anyone been able to use a higher version of LO?
>
Yes, I easily installed
On 12/14/2015 05:29 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:16:42 -0500 ken wrote:
How? I downloaded two (larger) of the three Centos 7 ISOs I could
find... the only ones I could find. (I listed on names of the ISOs
in my first post to this thread.)
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/iso
On 12/14/2015 2:37 PM, ken wrote:
http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/isos/x86_64/
Which seems to work for you? (Obviously, some work better than others.)
those appear to be old, maybe even pre-releases, as they don't follow
the proper name conventions. use either of the two links in my
On 12/14/2015 05:08 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:03:26 -0500
ken wrote:
Any suggestions as to what to do here?
I guess you still haven't tried booting the Live image?
Frank, I found another page with long list of them:
http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/isos/x86_64/
Whic
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:16:42 -0500
ken wrote:
> How? I downloaded two (larger) of the three Centos 7 ISOs I could
> find... the only ones I could find. (I listed on names of the ISOs in
> my first post to this thread.)
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/isos/x86_64/0_README.txt
That lists the
On 12/14/2015 2:16 PM, ken wrote:
On 12/14/2015 05:08 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:03:26 -0500
ken wrote:
Any suggestions as to what to do here?
I guess you still haven't tried booting the Live image?
How? I downloaded two (larger) of the three Centos 7 ISOs I could
find..
On 12/14/2015 05:08 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:03:26 -0500
ken wrote:
Any suggestions as to what to do here?
I guess you still haven't tried booting the Live image?
How? I downloaded two (larger) of the three Centos 7 ISOs I could
find... the only ones I could find. (I l
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:03:26 -0500
ken wrote:
> Any suggestions as to what to do here?
I guess you still haven't tried booting the Live image?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cent
On 12/14/2015 12:45 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 12/13/2015 01:48 PM, ken wrote:
So far I've created on this new laptop a big, empty partition; in the
BIOS enabled legacy booting and disabled UEFI;
I'd recommend not doing that. If you're planning to dual-boot, you'll
have to reinstall your o
Op 14-dec.-2015 22:02 schreef Frank Cox :
>
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:43:54 +0100
> Patrick Bervoets wrote:
>
> > I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and
> > LO
> > 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black).
> > Anyone been able t
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:43:54 +0100
Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO
> 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black).
> Anyone been able to use a higher version of LO?
This won't help you much on Centos
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 04:39:05PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Alice Wonder wrote:
>> > Just that it is not
>> > difficult to use, there are some advantages -
>>
>> Why don't you say what the advantages are,
>> instead of launching into a philosophical discussion of "
I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO
4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black).
Anyone been able to use a higher version of LO?
Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
Hi Everyone,
I thought I'd try asking here before joining the postfix mail list
since I'm running postfix on a CentOS 7 box.
I want to look up accounts via LDAP (an IPA server also on CentOS 7). I
created an "ldap_aliases" file and successfully tested it with the
postmap command: I can get the em
- Original Message -
| >> I don't really understand the intent behind firewalld. The RHEL7 Security
| >> Guide states "A graphical configuration tool, *firewall-config*, is used
| to
| >> configure firewalld, which in turn uses *iptables tool* to communicate
| with
| >> *Netfilter* in the k
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 04:39:05PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Alice Wonder wrote:
> > Just that it is not
> > difficult to use, there are some advantages -
>
> Why don't you say what the advantages are,
> instead of launching into a philosophical discussion of "market share".
So, while the p
On 12/13/2015 01:48 PM, ken wrote:
So far I've created on this new laptop a big, empty partition; in the
BIOS enabled legacy booting and disabled UEFI;
I'd recommend not doing that. If you're planning to dual-boot, you'll
have to reinstall your other OS after changing the boot type. There
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:30:08 -0500
ken wrote:
> Any know what else is possible?
Did you try using the Live Image that I suggested above? I've always had
better luck with than than the regular install image.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
_
See this announce mail here:
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-December/021518.html
Since it butchered the links, you can get ISOs here:
http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/7/isos/x86_64/
You can upgrade with 'yum update'
Release notes here:
http://wiki.centos.org/Manua
This is annoying. I yum removed NetworkManager-wifi... and I'm still
getting this junk in the logs:
MetworkManager[7723]: error requesting auth for
org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.enable-disable-wifi: (0) Authorization
check failed: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Message did
not r
Am 14.12.2015 um 15:16 schrieb Matthew Miller :
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:00:09PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Exists the possibility to define an RPM requires
>> statement with a logic? Like:
>> Requires: mysql-server OR mysql55-mysql-server
>> MTAs like postfix have "Provides: MTA" to provid
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:00:09PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Exists the possibility to define an RPM requires
> statement with a logic? Like:
> Requires: mysql-server OR mysql55-mysql-server
> MTAs like postfix have "Provides: MTA" to provide
> such facility. I do not see such possibility for
Exists the possibility to define an RPM requires
statement with a logic? Like:
Requires: mysql-server OR mysql55-mysql-server
MTAs like postfix have "Provides: MTA" to provide
such facility. I do not see such possibility for
DB packages ...
Thanks
--
LF
_
On 12/13/2015 05:00 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 16:48:25 -0500 ken wrote:
So far I've created on this new laptop a big, empty partition; in
the BIOS enabled legacy booting and disabled UEFI; also in BIOS
under Legacy Boot Order set "USB diskette on key/USB hard disk" on
second prio
39 matches
Mail list logo
