hi,
I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1
Signature : RSA/SHA1, Fri 08 Jan 2016 10:50:58 AM PST, Key ID
ad3b591d147abf59
Signatures from CentOS 7 use SHA256
Signature : RSA/SHA256, Wed 06 Jan 2016 08:54:58 AM PST, Key ID
24c6a8a7f4a80eb5
I'm trying to find where / how to use sha
Looked into this further and it looks like a kernel bug. If I
downgraded the running kernel everything started working again. I've
reported here https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10191 with some more
details.
Thanks
On 20 January 2016 at 11:36, Tim Robinson wrote:
> I still get the "the discar
I still get the "the discard operation is not supported" fstrim error
when the LVs are set to "nopassdown"
Seems that when I use ext4 the fstrim reports that it worked but the
LVs Data% does not decrease after the fstrim. xfs just throws the
error.
I've also been looking at the output of lsblk -D
On Tue, January 19, 2016 5:29 pm, J Martin Rushton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I suspect that the gold layer on edge connectors 30-odd years ago was
> a lot thicker than on modern cards.
I remember a long time ago - that actually was in the country "Far -Far
Away"
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On a modern hard disk, you should *never* see bad sectors, because the drive
> is busy hiding all the bad sectors it does find, then telling you everything
> is fine.
This is not a given. Misconfiguration can make persistent bad sectors
ve
On Tue, January 19, 2016 4:48 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/19/2016 2:24 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> Itâs dying. Replace it now.
>
> agreed
>
>> On a modern hard disk, you should*never* see bad sectors, because the
>> drive is busy hiding all the bad sectors it does find, then telling you
>>
On 1/19/2016 3:29 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote:
I suspect that the gold layer on edge connectors 30-odd years ago was
a lot thicker than on modern cards. We are talking contacts on 0.1"
spacing not some modern 1/10 of a knat's whisker. (Off topic) I also
remember seeing engineers determine which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I suspect that the gold layer on edge connectors 30-odd years ago was
a lot thicker than on modern cards. We are talking contacts on 0.1"
spacing not some modern 1/10 of a knat's whisker. (Off topic) I also
remember seeing engineers determine which m
On 1/19/2016 2:24 PM, Warren Young wrote:
It’s dying. Replace it now.
agreed
On a modern hard disk, you should*never* see bad sectors, because the drive is
busy hiding all the bad sectors it does find, then telling you everything is
fine.
thats not actually true.the drive will repor
My guess? The passthrough is causing the error when the command passes
through to the actual device, which doesn't support Trim.
I don't know how it actually works, but you can try to poke it with this
stick: copy a large file to this LV. Check the LV with lvdisplay. Delete
the file. Fstrim. Lvdi
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016, 3:30 PM wrote:
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016, 4:39 AM Alessandro Baggi
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Il 18/01/2016 12:09, Chris Murphy ha scritto:
> >> > What is the result for each drive?
> >> >
> >> > smartctl -l scterc
> >> >
> >> SCT Error Recovery Control comm
Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016, 4:39 AM Alessandro Baggi
>
> wrote:
>> Il 18/01/2016 12:09, Chris Murphy ha scritto:
>> > What is the result for each drive?
>> >
>> > smartctl -l scterc
>> >
>> SCT Error Recovery Control command not supported
>>
> The drive is disqualified unless your
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016, 4:39 AM Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
> Il 18/01/2016 12:09, Chris Murphy ha scritto:
> > What is the result for each drive?
> >
> > smartctl -l scterc
> >
> >
> > Chris Murphy
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > h
On Jan 17, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
>
> On sdb there are not problem but with sda:
>
> 1) First run badblocks reports 28 badblocks on disk
> 2) Second run badblocks reports 32 badblocks
> 3) Third reports 102 badblocks
> 4) Last run reports 92 badblocks.
It’s dying. Replace i
Am 2016-01-19 20:28, schrieb Jonathan Billings:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 05:11:22PM +0100, Joey wrote:
i connect a second monitor to my notebook and i stream the screen of
the 2.
monitor with ffmpeg / ffserver (installed on my notebook). a other
device eg
notebook, which is connect to beamer, s
Hi All
I'm trying to setup my LVM thin pool to support discards so that the pool
can reclaim space even if the underlying device doesn't support trim. It is
my understanding that all thin pools should support trim even if the
underlying device doesn't. (please correct me if I'm wrong here)
I have
IIRC, back when I did presentations regularly there was a way to screen
share a second virtual desktop and leave the primary on the display
itself. But that was 5 years ago and I"ve slept since then.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Joey wrote:
> When i do presentation i have this workflow:
>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 05:11:22PM +0100, Joey wrote:
> i connect a second monitor to my notebook and i stream the screen of the 2.
> monitor with ffmpeg / ffserver (installed on my notebook). a other device eg
> notebook, which is connect to beamer, show my stream on the beamer.
>
> Very nice sol
When i do presentation i have this workflow:
I connect the beamer on my notebook so i have dualscreen. On my notebook
screen i have all icons/windows i need. The things i want to show i move
to the 2. desktopscreen (the beamer).
If i want to be independent of the cable-end of the beamer i do
I'm curious as to what exactly you are needing what appears to be a second
monitor without an actual second monitor? For what purpose do you think
you need such a setup? Maybe there's another method to get what you want
if you can give us more detail.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Joey wro
Am 2016-01-19 02:01, schrieb Mark LaPierre:
On 01/17/16 11:42, Joey wrote:
Hello List,
i want to use a Dual-Screen Solution without connected a second
Monitor.
Its a solution available, that a physical monitor/Device is simulated?
I
want to use it on KDE.
Thank you.
Joey
Hey Joey,
Doe
On 01/19/2016 02:16 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 19 Jan 2016 05:32, "Gordon Messmer" wrote:
On 01/18/2016 03:04 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I need/desire to set up a userID for an SSH tunnel, but not allow said
user to have a login to the server.
The user needs to be able to log in to a sh
Il 18/01/2016 16:47, Matt Garman ha scritto:
That's strange, I expected the SMART test to show some issues.
Personally, I'm still not confident in that drive. Can you check
cabling? Another possibility is that there is a cable that has
vibrated into a marginal state. Probably a long shot, but
On 1/19/16, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Telnet? (insane-non-encrypted-security-hole-protocol) please replace it
> with openssh.
>
> You can use auditd / user accounting / sudosh /rootsh/ or similar tools ..
>
> --
> Eero
>
> 2016-01-19 11:45 GMT+02:00 Hadi Motamedi :
>
>> Dear All
>> I have a centos s
Ok, I see.
Could you post the binary ldd?
Cheers,
Roberto Nebot
2016-01-18 18:42 GMT+01:00 Rob Kampen :
> On 14/01/16 10:49, melkor.kp wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anybody tried to install Skype on Centos 7.2?
>> It is giving a segmentation fault when you start it. I installed using the
>> nux re
Telnet? (insane-non-encrypted-security-hole-protocol) please replace it
with openssh.
You can use auditd / user accounting / sudosh /rootsh/ or similar tools ..
--
Eero
2016-01-19 11:45 GMT+02:00 Hadi Motamedi :
> Dear All
> I have a centos server with super user password access. There are a
>
Dear All
I have a centos server with super user password access. There are a
number of users on the same net accessing it via telnet with their
dedicated id/pwd . For the supervision purposes, I need to know which
user is issuing what command on the server . In other words ,
monitoring their activi
27 matches
Mail list logo
