On 02/08/2016 07:38 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 14:22 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
the only truly safe way to destroy data on magnetic media is to grind
the media up into filings or melt it down in a furnace.
I unscrew the casing, extract the disk platter(s), slide a very
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of EGO-II.1
> Sent: den 9 februari 2016 09:00
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Utility to zero unused blocks on disk
>
>
>
> >> the only truly safe way to destroy data on m
On 02/08/16 23:54, Chris Murphy wrote:
<<>>
> hdparm --user-master u --set-security-pass chickens /dev/sdX
centos 6.7, hdparm v- 9.43;
hdparm --user-master u --security-set-pass chickens /dev/sdX
--
peace out.
If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes...
...oh, wait. He do
On 02/08/16 23:39, Digimer wrote:
> On 09/02/16 12:24 AM, g wrote:
<<>>
>> fell better? :-P
>
> I need ice cream to feel better. ;)
>
.
Baskin-Robbins 32 flavors + special of month.
--
peace out.
If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes...
...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains
On 2/9/2016 12:42 AM, g wrote:
On 02/08/16 23:39, Digimer wrote:
>
>I need ice cream to feel better.;)
>
.
Baskin-Robbins 32 flavors + special of month.
After seeing Aaron Neville tonight (wow, what a show, 3rd row center
seats in a small theater, we were 15' from the stage), we stopped at The
I'm putting the Centos 7 repository Samba 4 packages on hold.
Going to work with Samba 4 source with embedded heimdal.
I see this suggested often on the samba mailing list.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Mike <1100...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I performed a Samba 4 Active Directory Domain Controller
On 8 February 2016 at 20:41, Mike <1100...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I performed a Samba 4 Active Directory Domain Controller install in June of
> 2015 on CentOS 7.
> At that time I used the Samba 4.1.XX package from SerNet due to the absence
> of necessary heimdal packages and libraries not provided in
Hello,
I'm cross posting this from the OpenSwan mailing list, in case someone here
can help.
We have two sites connected via OpenSwan 2.6.32-9 on CentOS 5, sharing 6
/24 subnets each (so 12 in total).
The problem we're having is completely randomly, be it in the middle of the
day, or in the midd
Thanks, I've updated the config with the following:
keylife=20m
ikelifetime=2h
I'll see how that goes.
In the mean time, any other suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
On 10 February 2016 at 02:14, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Try setting lower keyexpiry time on other endpoint
Try setting lower keyexpiry time on other endpoint.
--
Eero
2016-02-09 17:04 GMT+02:00 John Cenile :
> Hello,
>
> I'm cross posting this from the OpenSwan mailing list, in case someone here
> can help.
>
> We have two sites connected via OpenSwan 2.6.32-9 on CentOS 5, sharing 6
> /24 subnets eac
CentOS: 7.1.1503
I have a problem with systemd which somehow manages to fill /tmp up with a lot
of
files. These files obviously are from the Apache server and don't pose a problem
per se. The problem is that these files don't get removed daily:
du -hs systemd-private-*
7,7Gsystemd-private-mp
On 02/09/16 02:51, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/9/2016 12:42 AM, g wrote:
>> On 02/08/16 23:39, Digimer wrote:
>>>
>>> I need ice cream to feel better.;)
>>>
>> .
>> Baskin-Robbins 32 flavors + special of month.
>
> After seeing Aaron Neville tonight (wow, what a show, 3rd row center
> seats in a
On 02/08/2016 07:38 PM, Always Learning wrote:
I unscrew the casing, extract the disk platter(s), slide a very strong
magnet over both sides of the platter surface then bend the platter in
half.
How secure is that ?
Actually, while there is some good security to that it's not for the
reason yo
This repository has begun triggering alerts in my enterprises trend
micro solution this morning.
centos.firehosted.com/7.2.1511/updates/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
Any tips on ensuring this repository is never queried by my systems ?
It seems to keep getting picked up on freshly deployed vagrant
On 02/09/2016 08:05 AM, Kai Bojens wrote:
It was my understanding that these temp-files should have been removed daily as
it is stated here:
Not all files, just those mentioned in /etc/tmpfiles.d/*
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lis
Hi James,
Thanks for your response.
I was nervous about installing the samba-dc packages, but after your post,
I spun up a virtual machine and installed the samba-dc packages and saw the
README to which you referred.
It sounds like work is well under way from a strong redhat-backed community.
This
On 02/09/2016 07:04 AM, John Cenile wrote:
does anyone have any suggestions on what the problem might be?
Not off the top of my head, but if I were you, I'd enable debugging of
"control" and "dpd". See man ipsec.conf (/plutodebug) and man ipsec_pluto.
Centos 5 is also a bit old os. Is it possible to use newer version? (like
centos 7 or centos 6?)
Eero
2016-02-09 19:52 GMT+02:00 Gordon Messmer :
> On 02/09/2016 07:04 AM, John Cenile wrote:
>
>> does anyone have any suggestions on what the problem might be?
>>
>
> Not off the top of my head, bu
On 09.02.2016 17:05, Kai Bojens wrote:
> CentOS: 7.1.1503
>
> I have a problem with systemd which somehow manages to fill /tmp up with a
> lot of
> files. These files obviously are from the Apache server and don't pose a
> problem
> per se. The problem is that these files don't get removed daily
Am 09.02.2016 um 19:34 schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn:
>> Am I missing something? Is there a better way with a systemd based systemd to
>> have these files removed daily?
> Have you checked which process creates the files and doesn't apparently
> clean them up properly by checking the contents for
On 02/02/2016 06:29 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:02:40 +0100
H wrote:
What do people use as a programming editor on CentOS 6?
I personally use Geany and/or vim, depending on what I'm doing and how I'm
doing it.
You can find pre-compiled rpms for the latest version of geany for
On 02/02/2016 07:19 PM, Yamaban wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:02, H wrote:
On 02/02/2016 03:50 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 02/02/2016 09:28 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> CentOS is not a bleeding-edge distribution that constantly keeps
> packages up to date with the upstream projects. If you wa
On 02/02/2016 07:20 PM, Chris Beattie wrote:
On 2/2/2016 12:02 PM, H wrote:
What do people use as a programming editor on CentOS 6? My first
impression of kate was favorable, not only did it support the usual
programming and scripting languages but also markdown which I have
I used gedit and Wi
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 21:43:50 +0100
H wrote:
> > You can find pre-compiled rpms for the latest version of geany for Centos 6
> > and 7 on my website if you want them. (The Centos 6 i386 rpm is two
> > versions behind but the x86_64 version is up to date. I don't have easy
> > access to an i386 Cen
On 02/09/2016 10:55 AM, Kai Bojens wrote:
They should, however, be
removed daily. I'd like to solve this with systemd's own tools instead
of searching for some 'tmp-reaper'.
At the risk of repeating myself, "systemd's own tools" ARE a "tmp-reaper."
From "man systemd-tmpfiles-clean.timer":
DESC
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:18 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/8/2016 9:54 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Secure erase is really the only thing to use on SSDs. Writing a pile
>> of zeros just increases wear (minor negative) but also doesn't
>> actually set the cells to the state required to accept a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/02/16 08:28, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of EGO-II.1 Sent:
>> den 9 februari 2016 09:00 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re:
>> [CentOS] Utility t
On 03/02/16 04:02, H wrote:
What do people use as a programming editor on CentOS 6? My first
impression of kate was favorable, not only did it support the usual
programming and scripting languages but also markdown which I have
recently discovered...
Sublime Text [0] slaughters them all, IMO
On Tue, February 9, 2016 8:36 pm, Anthony K wrote:
> On 03/02/16 04:02, H wrote:
>> What do people use as a programming editor on CentOS 6? My first
>> impression of kate was favorable, not only did it support the usual
>> programming and scripting languages but also markdown which I have
>> recen
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Everything else is prone to failure.
Specifically, but not limited to, unetbootin. Really, people need to
just purge unetbootin from memory and stop recommending it. I've never
had it work on any (U)EFI system. And more often than not it would
So lowering the keylife / ikelifetime didn't solve the problem. I've
enabled debugging and I'll see what it says.
Unfortunately we can't (easily) upgrade CentOS, do you believe that would
make a huge difference though? Are the newer versions of OpenSwan *that *much
more reliable?
On 10 February 2
Well. Centos 5 is really near of it's end of life. There is not much
updates to kernel or openswan. You should at least try latest openswan
version.
Your issue looks like a bit network problem.
--
Eero
2016-02-10 8:34 GMT+02:00 John Cenile :
> So lowering the keylife / ikelifetime didn't solve
32 matches
Mail list logo
