Re: [CentOS] rpmbuild annoyance

2016-03-22 Thread Phil Wyett
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 22:11 +, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 16:20 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > I'm building a package (rasmol, if you must know) from an srpm. It's an > > FC20 pkg, nothing older, but the software itself hasn't changed. So... I > > try the build, and it fails,

Re: [CentOS] rpmbuild annoyance

2016-03-22 Thread Phil Wyett
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 16:20 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > I'm building a package (rasmol, if you must know) from an srpm. It's an > FC20 pkg, nothing older, but the software itself hasn't changed. So... I > try the build, and it fails, telling me: > gcc: %__global_ldflags: No such file or direct

Re: [CentOS] rpmbuild annoyance

2016-03-22 Thread Ned Slider
On 22/03/16 20:20, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I'm building a package (rasmol, if you must know) from an srpm. It's an FC20 pkg, nothing older, but the software itself hasn't changed. So... I try the build, and it fails, telling me: gcc: %__global_ldflags: No such file or directory make: *** [rasmo

Re: [CentOS] rpmbuild annoyance

2016-03-22 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 03/22/2016 01:20 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: gcc: %__global_ldflags: No such file or directory Sounds like a broken spec. __global_ldflags isn't always defined, so it should be conditionally referenced. IIRC, use %{?__global_ldflags} instead of %{__global_ldflags} __

[CentOS] rpmbuild annoyance

2016-03-22 Thread m . roth
I'm building a package (rasmol, if you must know) from an srpm. It's an FC20 pkg, nothing older, but the software itself hasn't changed. So... I try the build, and it fails, telling me: gcc: %__global_ldflags: No such file or directory make: *** [rasmol] Error 1 Now, this isn't a brand-new package

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw very unusual format

2016-03-22 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 03/22/2016 08:15 AM, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote: > What you mean is not listed ? > Click 1) https://www.centos.org/download/ > there click 2) More download choices > it goes to 3) https://wiki.centos.org/Download > there you see 4) Cloud / Containers , > http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/CentO

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw very unusual format

2016-03-22 Thread Aliaksei Sheshka
What you mean is not listed ? Click 1) https://www.centos.org/download/ there click 2) More download choices it goes to 3) https://wiki.centos.org/Download there you see 4) Cloud / Containers , http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw raw files are very useful, they

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw very unusual format

2016-03-22 Thread Fabian Arrotin
On 21/03/16 15:34, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote: > Hello! > > Is anyone aware why CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw has such unusual format ? > > root@test-srv:~# wget > http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw > --2016-03-21 13:16:31-- > http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/

Re: [CentOS] Postfix Installed by default on CentOS 7 Minimal

2016-03-22 Thread Mike Burger
On 2016-03-22 12:16 am, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: Is there a reason that Postfix is installed and enabled by default on CentOS 7 minimal? Keeping in mind that the minimal install is exactly the same as what upstream builds as a minimal install, I'll suggest this: A mail daemon is part of the m

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 133, Issue 9

2016-03-22 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ.