On Sat, May 7, 2016 6:38 pm, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 16:44 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Nux! wrote:
>> > Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might
>> not
>> > like the old ffmpeg I ship.
>
>> Nope.
>>
>> Yes, I'm on CentOS 6, but as this i
On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 16:44 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Nux! wrote:
> > Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might not
> > like the old ffmpeg I ship.
> Nope.
>
> Yes, I'm on CentOS 6, but as this is a US federal organization (civil
> sector), I did ask, and was t
On 05/07/2016 11:14 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
I usually include it into my rant, I forgot this time. No google chrome
for me, thank you very much. Nothing google to a degree possible. I don't
like my everything going to google (and NSA and whichever others)
databases. I know that 50% of my e-ma
On Windows (completely different software I know)
I've never been able to get 4K monitors to work
using HDMI 1.2. They always max out at 1080. Simply
using DisplayPort, everything else being equal,
fixes the problem. Same on Macs.
Jon Forrest
___
Cent
On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 21:32 +0100, Nux! wrote:
> Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might not like
> the old ffmpeg I ship.
>
> There is new and apparently working stuff in my testing repo; try to upgrade
> and see if that solves the problem.
> Feedback welcome so I c
On Sat, May 7, 2016 12:07 pm, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2016, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 1:54 pm, Jeff Layton wrote:
>>> Good afternoon,
>>>
>>> Apologies if this topic has come up before but I've found
>>> that the Firefox 45.1.0 stability to be somewhat lackin
On Sat, 7 May 2016, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2016, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2016-05-06, Nux! wrote:
Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might
not like the old ffmpeg I ship.
There is new and apparently working stuff in my testing repo; try to
upgrade an
On Fri, 6 May 2016, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2016 1:54 pm, Jeff Layton wrote:
Good afternoon,
Apologies if this topic has come up before but I've found
that the Firefox 45.1.0 stability to be somewhat lacking.
I've found that about Firefox in general some 5 years ago. Or rather
On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 21:32 +0100, Nux! wrote:
> Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might not like
> the old ffmpeg I ship.
>
> There is new and apparently working stuff in my testing repo; try to upgrade
> and see if that solves the problem.
> Feedback welcome so I c
On Sat, 7 May 2016, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2016-05-06, Nux! wrote:
Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might
not like the old ffmpeg I ship.
There is new and apparently working stuff in my testing repo; try to
upgrade and see if that solves the problem. Feedback we
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Robert Nichols
wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 02:15 PM, Wes James wrote:
>
>> I found this:
>>
>> # lvextend -l +100%FREE /dev/myvg/testlv
>>
>> doing a search. What's the difference between 100%VG and 100%FREE?
>>
>
> For the special case of "100%" there is no difference
On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 10:02 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/02/2016 04:43 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 14:06 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 05/02/2016 01:46 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> >>
> >
> Anyone else experiencing unstable behaviour of FF 45.1 on C6
Le 07/05/2016 16:02, Peter a écrit :
> Yes, but you need to put the yum shell commands in a separate file. See
> yum-shell(8) for details.
Actually, I just gave your suggestion a spin on a sandbox machine. Yum
gets stuck in a frantic dependency resolving loop which can only be
interrupted by hitt
On 08/05/16 01:53, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 07/05/2016 14:57, Peter a écrit :
>> Rather than remove them and add them back use yum shell to just remove
>> the packages not in base or core:
>>
>> yum shell
>> remove *
>> install kernel @core @base
>> run
>> quit
>
> Sounds interesting. Does this
On 05/06/2016 02:15 PM, Wes James wrote:
I found this:
# lvextend -l +100%FREE /dev/myvg/testlv
doing a search. What's the difference between 100%VG and 100%FREE?
For the special case of "100%" there is no difference. For values
less than 100% with a non-empty VG, the two are quite different
Le 07/05/2016 14:57, Peter a écrit :
> Rather than remove them and add them back use yum shell to just remove
> the packages not in base or core:
>
> yum shell
> remove *
> install kernel @core @base
> run
> quit
Sounds interesting. Does this work in a script?
--
Microlinux - Solutions informat
On 05/06/2016 01:42 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/6/2016 11:39 AM, Wes James wrote:
file -s /dev/dm-0
and it says XFS
So would I use xfs_growfs?
bingo!xfs_growfs can be used with the file system online, I'm pretty
sure resize2fs requires the file system to be offline (unmounted).
O
On 2016-05-06, Nux! wrote:
> Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might
> not like the old ffmpeg I ship.
>
> There is new and apparently working stuff in my testing repo; try to
> upgrade and see if that solves the problem. Feedback welcome so I can
> move the testing p
On 07/05/16 23:16, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> After some more trial and error, I managed to resolve the problem in a
> pragmatic way by doing the following after purging the system:
>
> # yum groupinstall "Core"
> # yum groupinstall "Base"
>
> So the missing culprit(s) must have been somewhere in th
Hello all,
with the great help of Sumit Bose from sssd- mailinglist the issue is solved:
"ah, can you try to add 'use_fully_qualified_names = True' to the
[domain/...] section of sssd.conf, restart SSSD and try again? Now
'wbinfo -s ' (lower-case s) should return a result as well."
That did
Le 06/05/2016 18:31, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
> There actually are a couple more things than core in a minimal install
> .. here is the current minimal list:
>
> https://git.centos.org/blob/sig-core!comps.git/220ef7b59c95531d3752d4074ce673aa09792c67/c7-minimal-x86_64-RPMS.lst
>
> some of those mig
21 matches
Mail list logo
