I have a number of machines which PXE boot using the images provided by
CentOS here:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/images/pxeboot/
That gives the machines kernel 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64. I would like to
move to a newer kernel as I'm seeing a serious I/O problem which I
suspect is
On 05/09/2016 06:15 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 05:21 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>> Is the https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool
>> still not recommend?
>>
>> Is there a expected time when it will be working?
>
>
> I personally would never do an in place upgrade on a pro
On 05/09/2016 05:21 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Is the https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool
> still not recommend?
>
> Is there a expected time when it will be working?
I personally would never do an in place upgrade on a production machine.
Call it a personal bias.
The versions
On 5/9/2016 3:21 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
Is thehttps://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool
still not recommend?
Is there a expected time when it will be working?
7 is *so* different than 6 in *so* many ways that I would /never/
recommend an automatic update.
--
john r pierce, recy
Is the https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool
still not recommend?
Is there a expected time when it will be working?
Thanks,
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On May 9, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 1:14 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 05/09/2016 11:01 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> Thanks Gordon! Yes, I know, ZFS, of course. I hear it as you definitely
>>> will use zfs for "bricks" of distributed file system, right?
>
The Anaconda installer now provides a "Security Policy", although
selecting any of the available profiles does not seem to have much
effect on the overall installation. Has anyone here had any success
with using the kickstart file that is installed when "Pre-release Draft
STIG for CentOS Linux 7 S
On 05/09/2016 11:46 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Yes, ZFS, and thanks a lot! For distributed file system "brick" boxes ZFS
(btrfs,...) may be a must, but only if distributed filesystem doesn't have
its own mechanism ensuring file integrity, right?
Ignore distributed filesystems for a moment. Is
Ah did a yum clean all and I see them now. Thank you Nux! from all of
us using your great repo.
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Robert,
>
> Funny you should ask, I have pushed them out a few hours ago. Enjoy.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> w
Robert,
Funny you should ask, I have pushed them out a few hours ago. Enjoy.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Arkiletian"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Monday, 9 May, 2016 17:29:07
> Subject: Re: [CentOS]
On Mon, May 9, 2016 1:14 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 11:01 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> Thanks Gordon! Yes, I know, ZFS, of course. I hear it as you definitely
>> will use zfs for "bricks" of distributed file system, right?
>
>
> You could, I suppose, but I don't think its use case i
On 05/09/2016 11:01 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Thanks Gordon! Yes, I know, ZFS, of course. I hear it as you definitely
will use zfs for "bricks" of distributed file system, right?
You could, I suppose, but I don't think its use case is limited to
that. There aren't many spaces where I think y
On 05/08/2016 06:51 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
In the
past LSI would be my definite second choice, and 3ware was winning me only
by their transparent web interface.
3ware had a much more pleasant web UI and CLI, but their hardware was
terribly unreliable and their performance was pretty awful,
On Mon May 9 2016 15:24:20 UTC, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
>>On Mon, May 9, 2016 10:26, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> Any ideas as to what happened and how to fix it?
>>
>
> It looks like your package update was interrupted by a
> SIGHUP signal (that's what the Hangup is from). The
> %posttrans scr
I dealing with problem 1 - see previous message - I set about creating
a live DVD on my development system. Now I find that I cannot seem to
mount a medium in that drive. wodim --devices reports it as present
and so does cdrecode. I can use the eject utility to toggle the tray
open and closed.
On Mon, May 9, 2016 11:12 am, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 05/08/2016 06:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> there are really only two choices today, Adaptec and Avago (formerly
>> LSI, they also control the former Areca product line).
>
> I don't believe that is correct. LSI acquired 3ware, and Avago a
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Ok, managed to rebuild most the stuff; had to retire gstreamer-vaapi though.
>
> yum --enablerepo=nux-dextop-testing update
>
> Should fix the Firefox issue, let me know if it causes any problems or other
> requests.
>
Any ETA when these updates will
On 05/08/2016 06:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
there are really only two choices today, Adaptec and Avago (formerly
LSI, they also control the former Areca product line).
I don't believe that is correct. LSI acquired 3ware, and Avago acquired
LSI. So, Avago owns the 3ware and LSI technology, b
On 05/08/2016 12:03 PM, nikos sarantopoulos wrote:
but what permissions i should set to this image
connected to a loop device
Ignore the fact that the filesystem is on a loopback device. You will
set permissions exactly the same way you would for any other directory.
Generally: create a gr
On 05/08/2016 12:09 PM, nikos sarantopoulos wrote:
i join windows workstations from the computer with the properties and
switching it to a domain giving after the credentials of the Administrator
and the password of the Administrator to join the active directory domain
Again, how did you creat
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:26:06AM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> We have four identical hardware system. On one of them the most
> recent kernel update yields this error:
>
> # yum history info 332
> [...]
> Scriptlet output:
>1 error: %posttrans(kernel-2.6.32-573.26.1.el6.x86_64) scriptle
Hi everybody,
I have to mount a DNS backend on Samba 4. I made a lot of search but all
send me to "samba-tool" which will allow me to create the dns backend. I
wonder if "samba-tool" is absent in the samba package ? :s
If anyone have a piece of answer, it will be very kind.
Thank you
__
We have four identical hardware system. On one of them the most
recent kernel update yields this error:
# yum history info 332
Loaded plugins: etckeeper, fastestmirror, priorities
Transaction ID : 332
Begin time : Wed May 4 10:21:07 2016
Begin rpmdb: 831:9ef9185577e3d2adb2d1ff0045619e1e0
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ.
On Fri, 6 May 2016, Nux! wrote:
Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might not
like the old ffmpeg I ship.
There is new and apparently working stuff in my testing repo; try to upgrade
and see if that solves the problem. Feedback welcome so I can move the
testing packa
25 matches
Mail list logo
