hi all,
after i upgraded a physical server (SUN FIRE X4170) from CentOS 6.8 to 7.2
i am not able to get the same iSCSI read performance.
the server is connected to HP P2000 Storage via 2 x 1GbE Ethernet.
CentOS 6.8 gives me full read performance on raw iSCSI devices /dev/sdxx at
115MB/s.
CentOS
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 08:29:22PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 21:10:24 -0400
> Fred Smith wrote:
>
> > I'm running an up to date Centos-7 on my Acer Aspire One netbook. have
> > been for, well, ever since C7 was released.
>
> I'm typing this on my Acer Aspire One netbook runnin
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 07:02:35AM +0200, anax wrote:
> Try with CTRL-ALT-F2 (go to the console) and CTRL-ALT-F1 (go back to
> the X-Window). This may help...
>
> suomi
oh, sorry, I did try that, but failed to mention it. No, it makes
no visible difference at all.
>
> On 06/20/2016 03:10 AM, Fr
Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
for or at?
Is it trying to hibernate?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
> >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
> >for or at?
>
> Is it trying to hibernate?
gosh, I hope not! I was in the middle of using it, playing solitaire
and moving the mouse around a lot.
--
Motherboard time. Netbook is probably a throw away issue. Cost more t to repair
than buy new.
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>>> Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>> >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
>> >for or at?
>>
>> Is it trying to hibernate?
>
> gosh, I hope not! I was in the middle of using it, playing solitaire
> and moving the m
Dr. Mikeal Hughes wrote:
> Motherboard time. Netbook is probably a throw away issue. Cost more t to
> repair than buy new.
>
>> On Jun 20, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Fred Smith
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
Can anyone of you provide further hints o
On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/18/2016 02:49 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Fri, June 17, 2016 21:40, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>> https://letsencrypt.org/2015/11/09/why-90-days.html
>> With respect citing another person's or people's opinion in support
>> of
>> your own i
On Jun 18, 2016, at 4:39 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
>
> On 17/06/16 20:04, Warren Young wrote:
>>
>> I realize it is in the CentOS project’s best interest if users always use
>> the fastest mirror when downloading, but I claim that it is a bug to mark
>> any plugin as Requires, particularly when up
On 06/20/2016 09:43 AM, Warren Young wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2016, at 4:39 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
>>
>> On 17/06/16 20:04, Warren Young wrote:
>>>
>>> I realize it is in the CentOS project’s best interest if users always use
>>> the fastest mirror when downloading, but I claim that it is a bug to mark
On Mon, June 20, 2016 9:28 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Dr. Mikeal Hughes wrote:
>> Motherboard time. Netbook is probably a throw away issue. Cost more t to
>> repair than buy new.
>>
>>> On Jun 20, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Fred Smith
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, ÐлеÐ
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:28:48AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Dr. Mikeal Hughes wrote:
> > Motherboard time. Netbook is probably a throw away issue. Cost more t to
> > repair than buy new.
> >
> >> On Jun 20, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Fred Smith
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30
On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 10:47 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
> But hey, what is my time worth in comparison to the security those
> certificates provided? SECURITY that was trivially evaded in the end.
> Exactly what mindless person or committee of bike-shedders decided
> that software sh
On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology.
This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's
foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozill
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
> > >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
> > >for or at?
> >
> > Is it trying to hibernate?
>
> gosh, I hope not! I was in the middle o
Good evening,
on a CentOS 7 LAMP (not gateway) dedicated server I am
using iptables-services with the following /etc/sysconfig/iptables:
*filter
:INPUT DROP [0:0]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [294:35064]
-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A IN
Am 20.06.2016 um 21:01 schrieb Alexander Farber:
Good evening,
on a CentOS 7 LAMP (not gateway) dedicated server I am
using iptables-services with the following /etc/sysconfig/iptables:
*filter
:INPUT DROP [0:0]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [294:35064]
-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,E
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Alexander Farber
wrote:
>
> However I actually need my Jetty program to run at port 80 - so that users
> behind corporate firewalls can connect too.
>
> The Jetty doc at
> https://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/setting-port80-access.html
> suggests
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
> > > >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
> > > >for or at?
> > >
> >
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>> > > >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
>> > >
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:13:35PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Fred Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
> >> > >
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:13:35PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Fred Smith wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр
Hi,
I have one question about gstreamer. Why gstreamer can't use ffmpeg on centos?
is there some patent issue related to ffmpeg and gstreamer?
Thanks!
B.R.
Andrew
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen
On Mon, June 20, 2016 19:16, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> Exactly what mindless person or committee of bike-shedders decided
>> that software should be distributed so that copies of it expire?
>
> Expiration is a fundamental aspect of x509 certificates.
25 matches
Mail list logo