On 2015-10-07 15:21, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the
>> message of 06/02--
>>
>> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-June/013426.html
>>
>> Nor have I seen any additional informat
On 22/06/16 02:03 AM, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
>
>>>
>>> My question is: Is this even possible? All the documentation for HA that
>> I've found appears to not
>>> do this. Am I missing something?
>>
>> You can use oVirt for that (www.ovirt
On 22/06/16 02:10 AM, Tom Robinson wrote:
> Hi Digimer,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> On 22/06/16 15:20, Digimer wrote:
>> On 22/06/16 01:01 AM, Tom Robinson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have two KVM hosts (CentOS 7) and would like them to operate as High
>>> Availability servers,
>>> automatically
Hi Digimer,
Thanks for your reply.
On 22/06/16 15:20, Digimer wrote:
> On 22/06/16 01:01 AM, Tom Robinson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have two KVM hosts (CentOS 7) and would like them to operate as High
>> Availability servers,
>> automatically migrating guests when one of the hosts goes down.
>>
>> M
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
> >
> > My question is: Is this even possible? All the documentation for HA that
> I've found appears to not
> > do this. Am I missing something?
>
> You can use oVirt for that (www.ovirt.org).
>
When an UNCLEAN SHUDWON happens or ifdown eth0
>
> My question is: Is this even possible? All the documentation for HA that I've
> found appears to not
> do this. Am I missing something?
You can use oVirt for that (www.ovirt.org).
For that small number of hosts, you would probably want to use the
"hosted engine" architecture to co-locate the
On 22/06/16 01:01 AM, Tom Robinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two KVM hosts (CentOS 7) and would like them to operate as High
> Availability servers,
> automatically migrating guests when one of the hosts goes down.
>
> My question is: Is this even possible? All the documentation for HA that I've
Hi,
I have two KVM hosts (CentOS 7) and would like them to operate as High
Availability servers,
automatically migrating guests when one of the hosts goes down.
My question is: Is this even possible? All the documentation for HA that I've
found appears to not
do this. Am I missing something?
M
On 06/21/2016 05:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On 10/07/2015 01:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 10/07/2015 11:12 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>
On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386
On 22 Jun 2016 08:02, "Boris Epstein" wrote:
>
> I would think the same as Gordon that as long as your 64-bit VM
> virtualization is running properly there should be no problem running C7
on
> a VM running under C6. May I ask what the initial doubt was based upon?
Has
> anybody out there had such
I would think the same as Gordon that as long as your 64-bit VM
virtualization is running properly there should be no problem running C7 on
a VM running under C6. May I ask what the initial doubt was based upon? Has
anybody out there had such an issue before?
Cheers,
Boris.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016
On 06/21/2016 04:06 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Before I waste myself a bunch of time trying the impossible I figured I
would ask if I can install an instance of C7 in a KVM based VM on a C6 host.
Yes.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://
Hey all,
Before I waste myself a bunch of time trying the impossible I figured I
would ask if I can install an instance of C7 in a KVM based VM on a C6 host.
--
_
°v°
/(_)\
^ ^ Mark LaPierre
Registered Linux user No #267004
https://linuxcounter.net/
On 10/07/2015 01:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/07/2015 11:12 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the
message of 06/02--
https://lists.centos.o
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 6/21/2016 10:57 AM, Jules Bashizi wrote:
>> How to inst that Network manager please
>
> where is that unsigned package from?its not part of the standard
> repository, the standard network manager is...
>
> NetworkManager-1.0.6-29.el7_2.x86_64.rpm
>
I think perhaps Jule
On 06/21/2016 01:01 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 6/21/2016 10:57 AM, Jules Bashizi wrote:
>> How to inst that Network manager please
>
> where is that unsigned package from?its not part of the standard
> repository, the standard network manager is...
>
> NetworkManager-1.0.6-29.el7_2.x86_64.
On 6/21/2016 10:57 AM, Jules Bashizi wrote:
How to inst that Network manager please
where is that unsigned package from?its not part of the standard
repository, the standard network manager is...
NetworkManager-1.0.6-29.el7_2.x86_64.rpm
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
How to inst that Network manager please
Worthy agent of Light
Jules Irenge
MSc Student
University of Liverpool
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I think I have finally figured it out -
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO/NAT-HOWTO-6.html
says that "-j REDIRECT" is just a shortcut for "-j DNAT" with destination
address being the one of the interface:
"There is a specialized case of Destination NAT called redirection: it is a
simp
Thanks very much all for the responses
Apologies for delayed had a back injury keeping afk
Definitely have some food for thought
thanks all again
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Anthony K wrote:
> On 16/06/16 13:18, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>
>> .. the actual definition of a
>> 'CRITICAL' up
On Mon, June 20, 2016 13:16, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on
>>> epistemology.
>>> This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of t
Am 2016-06-21 16:58, schrieb Always Learning:
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 15:46 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 16:24 +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
> *nat
> :INPUT ACCEPT
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT
> :PREROUTING ACCEPT
> :POSTROUTING ACCEPT
> -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dst 144.76.184.154 --dp
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 15:46 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 16:24 +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
>
> > *nat
> > :INPUT ACCEPT
> > :OUTPUT ACCEPT
> > :PREROUTING ACCEPT
> > :POSTROUTING ACCEPT
> > -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dst 144.76.184.154 --dport 8080 -j REDIRECT
> > --to-po
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 16:24 +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
> *nat
> :INPUT ACCEPT
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT
> :PREROUTING ACCEPT
> :POSTROUTING ACCEPT
> -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dst 144.76.184.154 --dport 8080 -j REDIRECT
> --to-port 80
http://www.karlrupp.net/en/computer/nat_tutorial
# IMPORTANT: Activat
Am 2016-06-21 16:24, schrieb Alexander Farber:
Hello Gordon and others
[ ... ]
here the problem description again:
I have Jetty running as user "nobody" at the port 8080.
I need to redirect incoming HTTP requests to port 80 to the above port.
(So I don't think I have ports backwards).
Her
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Alexander Farber wrote:
Please help
Are you sure you want this as a PREROUTING rule, and not simply an INPUT rule?
jh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello Gordon and others
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 06/21/2016 02:30 AM, Alexander Farber wrote:
>
>> -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp -d 144.76.184.154/32 --dport 80 -j REDIRECT
>> --to-ports 8080
>>
>
>
> I think you have the ports backward, here.
>
here the problem
On 06/21/2016 02:30 AM, Alexander Farber wrote:
-A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp -d 144.76.184.154/32 --dport 80 -j REDIRECT
--to-ports 8080
I think you have the ports backward, here.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mai
Le 21/06/2016 à 14:33, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg a écrit :
> This is strange.
> "yum install gimp" should install gimp and its deps, not gimp28.
> "yum remove gimp28" should remove gimp28 and anyone depending on it, not
> gimp or "gimp stuff" (assuming you are not talking about "gimp stuff"
> from nux's
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 5:15 AM, Ulrich Leodolter
> wrote:
>
> has anyone an idea why iSCSI read performance degraded in CentOS 7.2 ?
I'm not sure about those versions of centos, but iSCSI throughput being TCP is
dependent on TCP receive window and packet loss. Tcpdump to see if the TCP
window
On 06/21/2016 02:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2016 07:33 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 06/21/2016 01:50 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
I just setup a CentOS 6 desktop with the nux-dextop repository activated.
When installing GIMP (yum install gimp), I get a gimp package as well as
On 06/21/2016 07:33 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> On 06/21/2016 01:50 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just setup a CentOS 6 desktop with the nux-dextop repository activated.
>>
>> When installing GIMP (yum install gimp), I get a gimp package as well as
>> a gimp28 package. I understand
On 06/21/2016 01:50 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
I just setup a CentOS 6 desktop with the nux-dextop repository activated.
When installing GIMP (yum install gimp), I get a gimp package as well as
a gimp28 package. I understand this is the Nux-Dextop GIMP 2.8 package.
Unfortunately this doesn't
On 06/21/2016 06:50 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just setup a CentOS 6 desktop with the nux-dextop repository activated.
>
> When installing GIMP (yum install gimp), I get a gimp package as well as
> a gimp28 package. I understand this is the Nux-Dextop GIMP 2.8 package.
> Unfortunately
Hi,
I just setup a CentOS 6 desktop with the nux-dextop repository activated.
When installing GIMP (yum install gimp), I get a gimp package as well as
a gimp28 package. I understand this is the Nux-Dextop GIMP 2.8 package.
Unfortunately this doesn't work so well with my system. It's not
localized
Hello again,
unfortunately the following /etc/sysconfig/iptables file does not work:
*nat
:INPUT ACCEPT
:OUTPUT ACCEPT
:PREROUTING ACCEPT
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT
#-A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 8080
-A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp -d 144.76.184.154/32 --dport 80 -j REDIRECT
On Wed, June 15, 2016 16:17, Warren Young wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Александр Кириллов
> wrote:
>>
>> Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g.
>>
>> http://www.startssl.com
>> http://buy.wosign.com/free
>
> Today, I would prefer Let’s Encrypt:
>
> https:
37 matches
Mail list logo
