> On 13 Jul 2016, at 4:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> On 7/12/2016 10:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I'll mention it to my manager. However, much more important is finding
>> something that will tell me*which* drive in a RAID just failed so I can
>> replace it
>
>
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1406 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1406.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
--On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 11:20 AM -0700 Jeff White
wrote:
how do you tell firewalld to stop forwarding traffic between interfaces?
(Caveat: I'm a firewalld virgin so know only what I've read.)
I believe firewalld works in terms of "zones", not interfaces. An
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1402
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1402.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1398
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1398.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1396
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1396.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1411
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1411.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1412
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1412.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1410
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1410.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1408
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1408.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1403
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1403.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1400
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1400.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1405
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1405.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1407
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1407.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1401
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1401.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1399
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1399.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
On 7/12/2016 10:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'll mention it to my manager. However, much more important is finding
something that will tell me*which* drive in a RAID just failed so I can
replace it
thats something thats remained a deep dark secret in the linux (and
generic unix)
On Tue, July 12, 2016 12:52 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hi, John,
>
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 7/12/2016 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Got an older Dell R410, with an LSI 1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT
>>> SAS
>>> (rev 08). It*appears* that a) trying MegaRaid, and b) from what I'm
Hi, John,
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 7/12/2016 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Got an older Dell R410, with an LSI 1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS
>> (rev 08). It*appears* that a) trying MegaRaid, and b) from what I'm
>> googling, that what I need are mptfusion-related packages.
>>
Hey, Valeri,
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Tue, July 12, 2016 12:19 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>Got an older Dell R410, with an LSI 1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS
>> (rev 08). It *appears* that a) trying MegaRaid, and b) from what I'm
>> googling, that what I need are mptfusion-related
On 7/12/2016 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Got an older Dell R410, with an LSI 1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS
(rev 08). It*appears* that a) trying MegaRaid, and b) from what I'm
googling, that what I need are mptfusion-related packages.
Unfortunately, yum shows me nothing available in
On 07/12/2016 09:52 AM, Hersh wrote:
There was some problem with our system so I re-installed the server with
CentOS 7. Now, when I am trying to run 'fdisk -l' command, it is returning
a broken output.
It throws this error- "fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdc: Input/output error".
So, your server
On Tue, July 12, 2016 12:19 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
>Got an older Dell R410, with an LSI 1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS
> (rev 08). It *appears* that a) trying MegaRaid, and b) from what I'm
> googling, that what I need are mptfusion-related packages.
> Unfortunately, yum
On CentOS 7 with firewalld I have a box with numerous interfaces acting
as a NAT gateway. This works but I noticed that it routes/forwards
traffic not just from my internal zone to external zone but also between
interfaces within the internal zone. How can I prevent that traffic?
I've tried
Hi, folks,
Got an older Dell R410, with an LSI 1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS
(rev 08). It *appears* that a) trying MegaRaid, and b) from what I'm
googling, that what I need are mptfusion-related packages.
Unfortunately, yum shows me nothing available in base, epel, or
rpmfusion. Am I
On 07/12/2016 11:52 AM, Hersh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There was some problem with our system so I re-installed the server with
> CentOS 7. Now, when I am trying to run 'fdisk -l' command, it is returning
> a broken output.
>
> It throws this error- "fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdc: Input/output error".
>
Hi,
There was some problem with our system so I re-installed the server with
CentOS 7. Now, when I am trying to run 'fdisk -l' command, it is returning
a broken output.
It throws this error- "fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdc: Input/output error".
There are valid /dev/sdd and /dev/sde devices which
Thanks.
I have tried the commands which you have suggested but, unfortunately they
did not work for me. I just reinstalled the server.
Regards
Hersh
On 7 July 2016 at 10:31, Venkata Balaji N wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Hersh wrote:
>
> > Hi
On 12 July 2016 at 14:58, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>
> There is a newer installer here that should install on problematic
> Skylake machines:
>
> http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/isos/x86_64/
>
> The isos are:
>
> CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1602-99.iso
>
On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 15:04 +0200, Walter H. wrote:
> On Tue, July 12, 2016 12:51, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
> > if I had any knowledge of systemd and other things that are more
> > than
> > > totally different ...
> > > I'm not an expert; is ip(6)tables still part of CentOS 7?
> > >
> >
> > It is
On Tue, July 12, 2016 12:51, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
> if I had any knowledge of systemd and other things that are more than
>> totally different ...
>> I'm not an expert; is ip(6)tables still part of CentOS 7?
>>
>
> It is available but not installed by default, you will have to install it
> and
On 07/12/2016 06:03 AM, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
>>
>> WRT CentOS 7, we are maintaining a very current LTS kernel for IoT
>> boards that works with CentOS 7 x86_64.
>>
>> It should work well with new devices:
>>
>
> I would have to agree with Yamaban, even though CentOS 7 is maintaining a
> very
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
I would have to agree with Yamaban, even though CentOS 7 is maintaining a
very current LTS kernel, new devices that has Skylake processors simply do
not work. You can't even install CentOS on these devices because the kernel
will not load.
I'm not
>
> WRT CentOS 7, we are maintaining a very current LTS kernel for IoT
> boards that works with CentOS 7 x86_64.
>
> It should work well with new devices:
>
I would have to agree with Yamaban, even though CentOS 7 is maintaining a
very current LTS kernel, new devices that has Skylake processors
On 07/12/2016 03:36 AM, Yamaban wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:15, Walter H. wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> can CentOS 6.8 be run on a mini-PC like this?
>> https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano
>>
>> would like to configure this as a Firewall, and this should be instead of
>> my
if I had any knowledge of systemd and other things that are more than
> totally different ...
> I'm not an expert; is ip(6)tables still part of CentOS 7?
>
It is available but not installed by default, you will have to install it
and stop and disable firewalld.
--
Kind Regards
Earl Ramirez
Hi,
If you are interested in giving some testing, I've rebuilt from Fedora
the last Mesa stack with VirGL 3D and others drivers enabled.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/
Regards,
Jean-Marc Liger
___
CentOS-virt
On Tue, July 12, 2016 10:36, Yamaban wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:15, Walter H. wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> can CentOS 6.8 be run on a mini-PC like this?
>> https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano
>>
>> would like to configure this as a Firewall, and this should be instead
>> of
>>
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:15, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
can CentOS 6.8 be run on a mini-PC like this?
https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano
would like to configure this as a Firewall, and this should be instead of
my router (integratet firewall, NAT) and wlan-ap
Thanks,
Walter
On 7/12/2016 1:15 AM, Walter H. wrote:
can CentOS 6.8 be run on a mini-PC like this?
https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano
would like to configure this as a Firewall, and this should be instead of
my router (integratet firewall, NAT) and wlan-ap
dunno why it wouldn't work,
Hello,
can CentOS 6.8 be run on a mini-PC like this?
https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano
would like to configure this as a Firewall, and this should be instead of
my router (integratet firewall, NAT) and wlan-ap
Thanks,
Walter
___
42 matches
Mail list logo