Re: [CentOS] command line file completion on CentOS 7

2016-07-14 Thread John Hodrien
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: John Hodrien wrote: On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Jerry Geis wrote: Why are they not the same? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296366 Not just more for me - in odd cases, not all the time, but on some of our servers, and no, I don't remembe

Re: [CentOS] command line file completion on CentOS 7

2016-07-14 Thread m . roth
John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Jerry Geis wrote: > >> Why are they not the same? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296366 > Not just more for me - in odd cases, not all the time, but on some of our servers, and no, I don't remember if they're C6 or c7, sometimes filec wor

Re: [CentOS] command line file completion on CentOS 7

2016-07-14 Thread John Hodrien
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Jerry Geis wrote: Why are they not the same? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296366 jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] command line file completion on CentOS 7

2016-07-14 Thread Jerry Geis
I have noticed on CentOS 7.2 that when I am doing command line file TAB completion it behaves differently. if I have a file /tmp/file 1.txt (notice the space) when I do: ls /tmp/file and hit TAB it works but if I do: more /tmp/file and hit TAB it does NOT work. What I get is 1.txtfile v

Re: [CentOS] Broken output for fdisk -l

2016-07-14 Thread Zdenek Sedlak
On 2016-07-14 07:34, Hersh wrote: > I tried to run fsck on /dev/sdc drive and here what I got. > > [root@localhost ~]# fsck /dev/sdc > fsck from util-linux 2.23.2 > e2fsck 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013) > fsck.ext2: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read > while trying to open /dev/sdc

Re: [CentOS] Broken output for fdisk -l

2016-07-14 Thread Marcelo Roccasalva
What's in your /var/log/dmesg? (search for sdc and the nearby lines) On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Hersh wrote: > I tried to run fsck on /dev/sdc drive and here what I got. > > [root@localhost ~]# fsck /dev/sdc > fsck from util-linux 2.23.2 > e2fsck 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013) > fsck.ext2: Attempt t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 firewalld ploblem

2016-07-14 Thread 望月忠雄
Thank you. I can access to the server. 2016-07-14 18:29 GMT+09:00 Eero Volotinen : > Ok. > > try following: > > firewall-cmd --add-port=110/tcp --permanent > firewall-cmd --reload > > Eero > > 2016-07-14 12:22 GMT+03:00 望月忠雄 : > > > I cannot add pop3 with following error. > > # firewall-cmd --pe

Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 firewalld ploblem

2016-07-14 Thread Eero Volotinen
Ok. try following: firewall-cmd --add-port=110/tcp --permanent firewall-cmd --reload Eero 2016-07-14 12:22 GMT+03:00 望月忠雄 : > I cannot add pop3 with following error. > # firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=external --add-service=pop3 > Error: INVALID_SERVICE: pop3 > > And cannot access to 143 too.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 firewalld ploblem

2016-07-14 Thread 望月忠雄
I cannot add pop3 with following error. # firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=external --add-service=pop3 Error: INVALID_SERVICE: pop3 And cannot access to 143 too. telnet 153.153.xxx.xxx 143 Trying 153.153.xxx.xxx... telnet: connect to address 153.153.xxx.xxx: No route to host 2016-07-14 17:53 GMT

Re: [CentOS] vnc on C7

2016-07-14 Thread koenigsohn
Hi Jonathan, it works with the xterm option. Many Thanks! Koenigsohn -- View this message in context: http://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-vnc-on-C7-tp5743554p5744095.html Sent from the CentOS mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 firewalld ploblem

2016-07-14 Thread Eero Volotinen
You need to add pop3. Please note that op3 is not secure as password and username is transferred in plain text. *firewall-cmd --add-service=pop3 --permanent* *firewall-cmd --reload--* *Eero* 2016-07-14 11:43 GMT+03:00 Subscriber : > > Thursday, July 14, 2016, 11:32:31 AM, you wrote: > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 firewalld ploblem

2016-07-14 Thread Subscriber
Thursday, July 14, 2016, 11:32:31 AM, you wrote: > Dear Members, > Please tell me how can I fix this problem. > Against allow imap on firewalld, I cannot access to the server. imap - port 143 pop3 - port 110 add to firewalld service pop3 or try telnet 153.153.xxx.xxx 143 > [root@speedex ~]#

Re: [CentOS] yum returns error 'repolist 0'

2016-07-14 Thread Eero Volotinen
You can also add yum -v or -vv to debug issue more. Eero 2016-07-14 11:36 GMT+03:00 Jose Maria Terry Jimenez : > El 14/7/16 a las 9:01, ge lignored escribió: > >> greetings to one and all. >> >> a new iso burn w/ centos 6.8 failed to boot on a 686 32 bit mid tower box, >> but will boot a 32 bit

Re: [CentOS] yum returns error 'repolist 0'

2016-07-14 Thread Jose Maria Terry Jimenez
El 14/7/16 a las 9:01, ge lignored escribió: greetings to one and all. a new iso burn w/ centos 6.8 failed to boot on a 686 32 bit mid tower box, but will boot a 32 bit laptop, so i dropped back to 6.7 which did boot. after install with centos 6.7, attempt to upgrade fails with 'repolist 0'. a

[CentOS] CentOS7 firewalld ploblem

2016-07-14 Thread 望月忠雄
Dear Members, Please tell me how can I fix this problem. Against allow imap on firewalld, I cannot access to the server. [root@speedex ~]# telnet 153.153.xxx.xxx 110 Trying 153.153.xxx.xxx... telnet: connect to address 153.153.xxx.xxx: No route to host After stopping forewalld I can access to t

[CentOS] yum returns error 'repolist 0'

2016-07-14 Thread ge lignored
greetings to one and all. a new iso burn w/ centos 6.8 failed to boot on a 686 32 bit mid tower box, but will boot a 32 bit laptop, so i dropped back to 6.7 which did boot. after install with centos 6.7, attempt to upgrade fails with 'repolist 0'. all desire repo files have enable = 1. searched