[CentOS] Bind Vulnerability CVE-2016-2775

2016-08-31 Thread Sidharth Sharma
Hello Experts, When we can expect Security Update for Bind Vulnerability on Centos 6.8/7.2? ISC BIND Lightweight Resolver Protocol Req Processing Dos Vulnerability: CVE-2016-2775 -- With Thanks & Regards: Sidharth Sharma ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@

[CentOS] Perl Unsafe Module Path Handling Directory Traversal Vulnerability ( CVE-2016-1238)

2016-08-31 Thread Sidharth Sharma
Hello Experts, When we can expect Security Update for Perl Vulnerability CVE-2016-1238 on CentOS 6.8 and 7.2? -- With Thanks & Regards: Sidharth Sharma ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] group write permissions not being respected

2016-08-31 Thread Chris Murphy
Try booting with enforcing=0 and if that fixes it, you need to find out what security label is needed for gluster. Chances are it's easiest to use -o context= mount option on the brick, but if the brick is not exclusive to gluster you'll need chcon -R. If that's not it, maybe try the gluster clie

Re: [CentOS] group write permissions not being respected

2016-08-31 Thread Pat Haley
For example the directory /gdata/bibliography/Work/GroupBib/trunk/ can be written in by user phaley but not by other users who are member of the group mseasweb. The directory has permissions [root@mseas ~]# ls -lh /gdata/bibliography/Work/GroupBib total 12K drwxrwsr-x 4 phaley mseasweb 4.0K

Re: [CentOS] group write permissions not being respected

2016-08-31 Thread m . roth
Stupid question, and note I missed most of the earlier posts in this thread: what are the permissions on the directory that this directory are in? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] group write permissions not being respected

2016-08-31 Thread Pat Haley
So far, those look the same client: [root@mseas FixOwn]# getfacl /gdata/bibliography/Work/GroupBib/trunk/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: gdata/bibliography/Work/GroupBib/trunk/ # owner: phaley # group: mseasweb # flags: -s- user::rwx group::rwx other::r-x server

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-31 Thread Arun Khan
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Alexander Farber wrote: > You should have provided more info initially. > > "goes out in text format" might mean several things. > I don't know what you mean by "several things" In the context of logwatch the only options are HTML or TEXT. Please see my OP. Tha

Re: [CentOS] group write permissions not being respected

2016-08-31 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 08/30/2016 03:01 PM, Pat Haley wrote: the owner of a directory can still write to that directory but any other member of the associated group cannot, even though the directory clearly has group write permissions set Use "getfacl" on both the client and server side to view the complete per

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-31 Thread Alexander Farber
You should have provided more info initially. "goes out in text format" might mean several things. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Arun Khan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Alexander Farber > wrote: > > logwatch is run as cronjob. > > Let's take cron out of the picture. Invoking lo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-31 Thread Arun Khan
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Alexander Farber wrote: > logwatch is run as cronjob. Let's take cron out of the picture. Invoking logwatch from an interactive shell -- no joy. The report still goes out in text format. -- Arun Khan ___ CentOS mailin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-31 Thread Alexander Farber
logwatch is run as cronjob. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Arun Khan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Alexander Farber > wrote: > > No, I mean there is sometimes a variable for mail format too: > > The HTML formatting is a logwatch option, invoked through the > logwatch.conf file. >

Re: [CentOS] NODEJS010-NPM is not getting installed due to dependency errors on Custom Centos ISO installation

2016-08-31 Thread Jim Perrin
On 08/31/2016 03:48 AM, SUDHANSHU BHUTANI wrote: > Hi, > > I have built successfully all the dependent packages of nodejs010 and npm. > > I have used following command:- > *rpmbuild --define 'scl nodejs010' --bb SPEC/name_of_spec.spec* You should really use mock, so that you don't have uninten

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 - logwatch report not in HTML format

2016-08-31 Thread Arun Khan
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Alexander Farber wrote: > No, I mean there is sometimes a variable for mail format too: The HTML formatting is a logwatch option, invoked through the logwatch.conf file. -- Arun Khan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cent

[CentOS] NODEJS010-NPM is not getting installed due to dependency errors on Custom Centos ISO installation

2016-08-31 Thread SUDHANSHU BHUTANI
Hi, I have built successfully all the dependent packages of nodejs010 and npm. I have used following command:- *rpmbuild --define 'scl nodejs010' --bb SPEC/name_of_spec.spec* Following is the list of RPMs cloned and built from GIT:- nodejs010-2.1-5.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm nodejs010-http-parser-2.