On Thu, Sep 1, 2016, 8:11 AM Pat Haley wrote:
>
> For the enforcing=0, is that referring to SELinux? If so, we are not
> running SELinux.
>
OK so neither that nor chcon nor context mount option apply. It's something
else.
>
> On 08/31/2016 11:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> ---
I'm observing double the amount of "recv" bytes in latest Centos v6.8 with
ixgbe 4.2.1-k.
Anybody seeing the same?
$ ethtool -i em1
driver: ixgbe
version: 4.2.1-k
$ uname -an
Linux chndcdmid01.rd.ph.cox.net 2.6.32-642.4.2.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 23
19:58:13 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Li
On 01/09/16 17:33, Sidharth Sharma wrote:
> When we can expect Security Update for Perl Vulnerability CVE-2016-1238 on
> CentOS 6.8 and 7.2?
I came up with a mitigation here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355695#c21
Peter
___
CentOS ma
For the enforcing=0, is that referring to SELinux? If so, we are not
running SELinux.
On 08/31/2016 11:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Try booting with enforcing=0 and if that fixes it, you need to find out
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:03:30AM +0530, Sidharth Sharma wrote:
> When we can expect Security Update for Perl Vulnerability CVE-2016-1238 on
> CentOS 6.8 and 7.2?
This would be a good place to watch for how Red Hat is addressing the
issue:
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-1238
-
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:34:08AM +, James Pearson wrote:
>
> Sidharth Sharma:
> >
> > When we can expect Security Update for Bind Vulnerability on Centos 6.8/7.2?
> > ISC BIND Lightweight Resolver Protocol Req Processing Dos Vulnerability:
> >CVE-2016-2775
>
> See:
>
> https://access.redh
On 2016-09-01 4:34 am, James Pearson wrote:
Sidharth Sharma:
When we can expect Security Update for Bind Vulnerability on Centos
6.8/7.2?
ISC BIND Lightweight Resolver Protocol Req Processing Dos
Vulnerability:
>CVE-2016-2775
See:
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-2775
Ou
Sidharth Sharma:
>
> When we can expect Security Update for Bind Vulnerability on Centos 6.8/7.2?
> ISC BIND Lightweight Resolver Protocol Req Processing Dos Vulnerability:
>CVE-2016-2775
See:
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-2775
James Pearson
__
On 30/08/16 10:00, Toralf Lund wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone here using smb:// URLs to access "Windows" shares? I've been
doing this for a while with common file systems at work, and it used
to work just fine. Then I while back, I started getting issues; I will
now just keep getting asked for a passwo
9 matches
Mail list logo