Re: [CentOS] OT: Areca ARC-1220 compatible with SATA III (6Gb/s) drives?

On 9/22/2016 5:56 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: Running C6 fileserver. Want to replace 7 year old HDs connected to an Areca ARC-1220 raid sata II (3Gb/s) controller. Has anyone used this controller with newer 2TB SATA III (6Gb/s) WD Re drives like the WD2000FYYZ or the WD2004FBYZ? sata III

[CentOS] Install Mariadb on Centos 7 fails

Folks I'm having problems installing Mariadb in Centos 7. Here's what I did: 0) Become root 1) Make sure that mariadb and mysql are NOT installed. 2) Delete residual libs rm -rf /var/lib/mysq* 3) yum install -y mariadb-server installed mariadb-5.5.50-1.el7_2.x86_64 from the

[CentOS] OT: Areca ARC-1220 compatible with SATA III (6Gb/s) drives?

Running C6 fileserver. Want to replace 7 year old HDs connected to an Areca ARC-1220 raid sata II (3Gb/s) controller. Has anyone used this controller with newer 2TB SATA III (6Gb/s) WD Re drives like the WD2000FYYZ or the WD2004FBYZ? ___ CentOS mailing

[CentOS-es] Rutas con Ipsec site to site

Saludos. Les comento que conectado un sitio a con un sitio b usando ipsec con libreswan en un centos 7 el tunel se conecta sin problemas, pero en mi red del sitio donde esta la infraestructura del centos alli tengo un iptables con proxy transparente. Cuando levanto el iptables + proxy tengo

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox a couple > releases back due to stability issues. CentOS also has removed it as > for our main repositories, we build the source code for RHEL with as few >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

On 23/09/16 02:48, Johnny Hughes wrote: > That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with ffmpeg support available, > therefore I have created a centosplus version of firefox that has ffmpeg > enabled starting with version 45.4.0-1, released to the repositories a > few minutes ago. You can get it from

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement

> -Original Message- > From: Karanbir Singh > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 17:50 > > let me chase that up, > > I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US > centric - but it also looks like it > aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS project No. Glad I

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement

let me chase that up, I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US centric - but it also looks like it aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS project side. best to work it via the board first. Regards On 22/09/16 22:27, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I posted on the dev list

Re: [CentOS] Using keepass on Centos 6

On 09/22/2016 01:12 PM, H wrote: I did install mono and then downloaded keepass in zip format, installed it and tried to run it. It did not work You probably need to install the mono-winforms package. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement

> -Original Message- > From: Brandon James > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 17:10 > > Jason, > > Please let me know if you need any additional help with this > request. I agree that a Centos 7 VPAT should be publicized. Not that I can think of, Karanbir thinks this might have to

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement

I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback. How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it is down at the FAQ level) do I run it by the Board? In other words, where do I discuss this? I will send the 2 vpats from my .gov account in a moment. -Jason > -Original

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement

Jason, Please let me know if you need any additional help with this request. I agree that a Centos 7 VPAT should be publicized. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > > > -Original Message- > >

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement

Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ? Regards On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > >> -Original Message- >> From: centos-docs-boun...@centos.org >> [mailto:centos-docs-boun...@centos.org] On

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 09:48 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox ... > That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with ffmpeg support available, > therefore I have created a centosplus version of firefox that has ffmpeg > enabled starting with

Re: [CentOS] Using keepass on Centos 6

On September 22, 2016 3:33:15 PM EDT, Gordon Messmer wrote: >On 09/22/2016 11:38 AM, H wrote: >> It seems this is only for C7? > > >Why do you think that? I checked an RHEL 6 system for the required >mono >packages. > >___

Re: [CentOS] smbldap-passwd does not update samba password

On 09/22/2016 12:18 PM, Bernard Fay wrote: I have never heard of ACI before and I really do not know what it is. ACIs are the rules in your directory server that govern what entries and attributes (such as the samba password) each DN (user) is allowed to edit. You should have an ACI that

Re: [CentOS] Using keepass on Centos 6

On 09/22/2016 11:38 AM, H wrote: It seems this is only for C7? Why do you think that? I checked an RHEL 6 system for the required mono packages. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] smbldap-passwd does not update samba password

I have never heard of ACI before and I really do not know what it is. In the other hand, what does this have do to with the passwords in Samba? Obviously, there are many things I do not know about LDAP and Samba but I have to manage it On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Gordon Messmer

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement

I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > -Original Message- > From: centos-docs-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-docs-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39 > To: centos-docs@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs]

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement

Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted? Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources -Jason > -Original Message- > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpye...@pdinc.us] > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08 > To:

Re: [CentOS] Using keepass on Centos 6

On 09/21/2016 08:25 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 09/21/2016 09:16 AM, H wrote: I wish there was one, it makes all the difference by allowing automated login to websites. Maybe you should take another look at keepass, then? Mono is available in EPEL. keepass runs reasonably well in it.

Re: [CentOS-virt] Fwd: Centos 6 AMI does not support c4-8xlarge

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > I've asked the AWS MP folks to enable as many instance types in as many > regions as possible. I am also pushing a new imageset across all regions > this coming Monday, which would include all updates upto 31st Aug

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:1912 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1912 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1912.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS] always boot from Elrepo kernel

Hello All, I purchased some Dell Latitude 3570 laptops. They came with Ubuntu preinstalled. ( Which I swapped for Centos7) I have to use Elrepo kernel on these machines to get some of the fn function keys to work. So I installed Elrepo's kernel-ml and selected this kernel with: #

[CentOS-virt] Virtualization SIG membership

Hi, can I join the Virtualization SIG? I am interested in packaging docker with Lokesh Mandvekar. Thank you very much, Fero signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

Johnny Hughes wrote: > The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox a couple > releases back due to stability issues. CentOS also has removed it as > for our main repositories, we build the source code for RHEL with as few > changes for branding/artwork as we can. > > That

Re: [CentOS-docs] Centos doesn't load or work

On 22/09/16 15:46, Robert Cunliffe wrote: > > I've tried Zorrin, Ubuntu and Centos. > > Zorrin and Ubuntu work fine, but Centos doesn't load, or run. > > I asked for advice, didn't get any and seem to have been added to all > your Centos mailing lists. > *Please remove me from your mailing lists.*

[CentOS] Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox a couple releases back due to stability issues. CentOS also has removed it as for our main repositories, we build the source code for RHEL with as few changes for branding/artwork as we can. That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with

[CentOS-docs] Centos doesn't load or work

I've tried Zorrin, Ubuntu and Centos. Zorrin and Ubuntu work fine, but Centos doesn't load, or run. I asked for advice, didn't get any and seem to have been added to all your Centos mailing lists. Please remove me from your mailing lists. Sincerely, Bob Cunliffe

Re: [CentOS-docs] Proposed Contribution for the "How To's" Section

On 21 September 2016 at 18:07, Rob Morrison wrote: > Hello, > > My username is RobMorrison > > The proposed subject of my Wiki contribution is "Backing up with Bacula" > > Some background information in case you are not aware of Bacula: > > According to Source

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:1912 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1912 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1912.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:1912 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1912 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1912.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] Flash player beta

Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew > wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard > innovate.net> wrote: >>> > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 >>> > From: isdtor >>>

Re: [CentOS] Flash player beta

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard innovate.net> wrote: > >> >> > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 >> > From: isdtor >> > >> > Has anyone

Re: [CentOS] Flash player beta

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard wrote: > > > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 > > From: isdtor > > > > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux? > > > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html

Re: [CentOS] Flash player beta

> Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 > From: isdtor > > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux? > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html > > I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-1, all x86_64. ff's > pluginreg.dat shows the

[CentOS] Flash player beta

Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux? http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-1, all x86_64. ff's pluginreg.dat shows the plugin is [INVALID], which is often a sign of bitness-mismatch, but that's not the case here. $

Re: [CentOS] PHP vulnerability CVE-2016-4073

On 2016-Sep-21 11:00, Alice Wonder wrote: > I feel the same way but I find that it is generally safe and beneficial to > update the LAMP stack on servers and the multimedia stack on the desktop. > > Things like HTTP/2 are not available in the Apache that ships even with > CentOS 7 and the PHP is