On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
/etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1
GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
...
/etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo
GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This
should be set on eth0 only.
# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP e
> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400
> From: TE Dukes
>
>> From: Gordon Messmer
>> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM
>>
>> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
>> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every
>> > was possible to be able to access the guest
On 10/3/2016 7:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
4: vboxnet0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state
UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 0a:00:27:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
are there any other /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg- files
beyond the ones you listed?
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
> > I ca
On 09/28/16 19:25, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I'm considering moving from CentOS 6 to CentOS 7. I'm not interested in
> dealing with Gnome 3. I've heard good things about Mate, a fork of
> Gnome 2. it appears that Mate is available in the EPEL repository
> associated with CentOS 7.
>
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:27:10PM -0700, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2016-10-03, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > IIRC, for mount.nfs, the "r" option is read only while the "w"
> > option is read+write. They may be mutually exclusive.
>
> I don't believe this is accurate. ro and rw are mutually exclusive,
On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible
to be able to access the guest from the LAN or even the host. Nothing I have
tried works.
The only thing all documentation leaves out is how to set up the guest
networking during
On 2016-10-03, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> IIRC, for mount.nfs, the "r" option is read only while the "w"
> option is read+write. They may be mutually exclusive.
I don't believe this is accurate. ro and rw are mutually exclusive, but
there is no "w" option. (Which doesn't help the OP, unfortunately,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 07:54:36AM -0400, TE Dukes wrote:
>
> OK, I'm about done trying to get this to work. I have spent HOURS reading,
> installing, re-installing, etc.
>
> I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible
> to be able to access the guest from the LAN
On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:42:41PM -0400, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> My NFS server has been working really well for a long time now. Both
> client and server run CentOS 7.2.
>
> However when I just had to remount one of my home directories on an NFS
> client, I'm now getting the error wh
Hey guys,
My NFS server has been working really well for a long time now. Both
client and server run CentOS 7.2.
However when I just had to remount one of my home directories on an NFS
client, I'm now getting the error when I run mount -a
mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified
Th
Hi all,
Is anyone using unbound to do dns64 on CentOS 7? A quick 'unbound -h'
shows both 'validator' and 'iterator' modules, but no dns64. Was it just
not included or is there a supplementary or alternative package I need
to install?
I had it working on CentOS 6 and don't recall any special
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Liam O'Toole
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:28 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message- F
On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message- From:
>> centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of Liam O'Toole Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 9:19 AM To:
>> centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS]
>> Virtualization Networking
>>
>> On 2016-10
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Liam O'Toole
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 9:19 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -
On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message- From:
>> centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of Michael Cole Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM To:
>> centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS]
>> Virtualization Networking
>>
>> Deletio
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> > Behalf Of Michael Cole
> > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization N
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Michael Cole
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking
>
> Deletion does not remove all, Try a erase if that
On the download page https://wiki.centos.org/Download it lists: DVD, Minimal,
Everything, LiveGNOME, LiveKDE.
Where can I find the lists of packages contained in each one without
downloading and extracting them? Is there a repo with the scripts that make
them maybe?
Harry
Harry Mallon
CODEX
19 matches
Mail list logo