On 02/07/2017 02:33 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
That's what I am trying to avoid, and that is easiest to avoid by just
using /usr as the prefix so that devel files have their headers in
/usr/include and devel files for different implementations of the same
API can not be installed at the same time.
On 02/07/2017 08:05 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I was expecting that command would build and install?
If that is not the case what do you run to install the package for
gstreamer and the plugins?
When rpmbuild finishes, it will list the rpm packages that it
generated. You can install those packag
On 02/07/2017 07:34 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 02/07/2017 01:42 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:
The software collections looks like it might interfere with some of my
own packaging (repos that build upon EPEL to provide modern server
stack based on LibreSSL and a repo for modern multimedia)
Where d
Hello Jerry,
it is a little while back, but:
First I'm analyse what the steps to do.
- Unpack the packackge rpm -i
that place it into my home folder /home/xxx/rpmbuild
- make my changes
- rpmbuild -bs rpmbuild/SPECS/..spec (file)
. mock rpmbuild/SRPM/new.src.rpm (file) - creates a sandbox f
Hello Jerry,
don't know why you need to upgrade gst-inspect plugin. But I did
update gstreamer plugin last year. If you like to take a view
http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/gstreamer/
cms4all.repo
[cms4all-gstreamer]
name=cms4all-gstreamer
#baseurl=http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/gstreamer/
ba
> Am 04.02.2017 um 13:55 schrieb Leon Fauster :
>
> I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus
> version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class.
>
OK, I see. The ffmpeg support is reenabled now
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330898).
This makes
> Am 07.02.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Jerry Geis :
>
> Gordon,
>
>
>> Did you install the package that you built? "rpm -qf /usr/bin/gst-inspect"
>
> All I did was the rpmbuild -ba for each of the items: gsteamer and the
> plugins.
>
>
> I was expecting that command would build and install?
>
>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 11:11:43AM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
> When I extract and try to compile gst-rtsp-server 0.10.8 the ./configure
> goes fine.
> but the make results in errors:
[...]
> CC libgstrtspserver_0.10_la-rtsp-media.lo
> rtsp-media.c: In function 'gst_rtsp_media_class_init':
> rt
I am trying to add a package (I know its older - but it should work)
gst-rtsp-server-0.10.8 to CentOS 7.
The gstreamer 0.10 packages are included in C7 and they compile just fine.
When I extract and try to compile gst-rtsp-server 0.10.8 the ./configure
goes fine.
but the make results in errors:
m
Gordon,
> Did you install the package that you built? "rpm -qf /usr/bin/gst-inspect"
All I did was the rpmbuild -ba for each of the items: gsteamer and the plugins.
I was expecting that command would build and install?
If that is not the case what do you run to install the package for
gstrea
On 02/07/2017 05:50 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
Did I miss something?
Did you install the package that you built? "rpm -qf /usr/bin/gst-inspect"
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 02/07/2017 01:42 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:
The software collections looks like it might interfere with some of my
own packaging (repos that build upon EPEL to provide modern server
stack based on LibreSSL and a repo for modern multimedia)
Where do you see a conflict? Those packages are str
Hi all,
I have a need to rebuild the gstreamer and gst-plugins in CentOS 7.
So I found the wiki for rebuilding a source package...
I downloaded the vault.centos.org files, installed them with dependencies.
I did the rpmbuild -ba for each of the four packages. All seemed to go well.
No errors repo
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ.
Yeah, I'm not fond of the new model for building packages by doing a git
checkout to get the spec files and sources and other stuff.
The software collections looks like it might interfere with some of my
own packaging (repos that build upon EPEL to provide modern server stack
based on LibreSSL
15 matches
Mail list logo