Re: [CentOS] Incorrect characters in Chinese font

On 10/29/2017 06:23 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 10/29/2017 03:12 PM, H wrote: >> On 10/29/2017 03:49 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >>> On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 15:03:49 -0400 >>> H wrote: >>> I had three characters I was not able to translate and after much hair-pulling realized to my surprise that

Re: [CentOS] low end file server with h/w RAID - recommendations

On 11/4/2017 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: How does spending between 300 and 800 for an Areca 8 port pay out when you can get a P410 for less than 100? Are they 3--8 times faster, 3--8 times easier to replace, 3--8 times more reliable, 3--8 times easier to use, 3--8 times more durable, 3--8

Re: [CentOS] low end file server with h/w RAID - recommendations

On Sat, November 4, 2017 1:56 pm, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2017-11-04, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Sat, November 4, 2017 4:32 am, hw wrote: >> >>> If the cli is poor, the gui may seem much better > > Indeed. Before the storcli tool came out, the only CLI tool for

Re: [CentOS] modestly priced laptop for C7

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 02:26:59PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 11/03/2017 12:09 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:48:11AM -0700, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 11/02/2017 03:38 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > >>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:09:04PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] low end file server with h/w RAID - recommendations

On 2017-11-04, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Sat, November 4, 2017 4:32 am, hw wrote: > >> If the cli is poor, the gui may seem much better Indeed. Before the storcli tool came out, the only CLI tool for the LSI cards was MegaCli, and it was atrocious. In that case I

Re: [CentOS] low end file server with h/w RAID - recommendations

On Sat, November 4, 2017 4:32 am, hw wrote: > Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Fri, November 3, 2017 3:36 am, hw wrote: >>> Valeri Galtsev wrote: If you have not Dell server hardware my choice of [hardware] RAID cards would be: Areca >>> >>> Areca is forbiddingly expensive.

Re: [CentOS-es] Compartir internet

Buenas tardes! Por este medio informo que ya resolvi el problema con lo siguiente: echo "net.ipv4.ip_forward=1" >> /etc/sysctl.conf firewall-cmd --zone=internal --change-interface=psp2firewall-cmd --zone=public --change-interface=psp1 firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=internal

Re: [CentOS] home on nfs

Patrick Bégou : > > About NFS home directories and CentOS have you .nfsx tempory > files located in the home of your user ? > I have this very often. I was not able to found any documentation about > this but if they are temporary files for NFS transactions is there a way > to store them

Re: [CentOS] home on nfs

> About NFS home directories and CentOS have you .nfsx tempory > files located in the home of your user ? > I have this very often. I was not able to found any documentation about > this but if they are temporary files for NFS transactions is there a way > to store them on on local

Re: [CentOS-es] Compartir internet

Deberías montar un servidor proxy con squid para que todos tus equipos salgan por ahí y poder realizar las restricciones del caso. En alcance libre hay un tuto muy bueno o en la red he visto varios Saludos César Martínez M. Ingeniero de Sistemas Proyectos de Software Libre Servicom Móvil

[CentOS] mariadb server memory usage

Hi, is this ok for a database server, or do I need to turn the memory allowance down? The machine has 48GB and mariadb is allowed about 40. The machine is a dedicated database server. Mysql seems to go up to what top says is virtually allocated under some circumstances; I don´t know what

Re: [CentOS] home on nfs

hw a écrit : Hi, I have the home directory of a user on an nfs server and mount it on a client. When the user logs in, they end up in the root directory rather than in their actual home directory and need to cd into it. The user can read and write to their home directory, so it kinda works

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:3111 CentOS 7 liblouis Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:3111 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3111 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS-docs] [Gitblit] arrfab pushed 1 commits => websites/centos.org.git

I've updated the maintainer notes to prevent this error in the future. Thanks for the fix Fabian. regards, bex On Fri, Nov 3, 2017, at 05:05 PM, Gitblit wrote: > https://git.centos.org/summary/websites!centos.org.git > > >--- >

Re: [CentOS] low end file server with h/w RAID - recommendations

Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Fri, November 3, 2017 3:36 am, hw wrote: Valeri Galtsev wrote: If you have not Dell server hardware my choice of [hardware] RAID cards would be: Areca Areca is forbiddingly expensive. Yes, and it is worth every dollar it costs. All good RAID cards will be on the

Re: [CentOS] low end file server with h/w RAID - recommendations

On 11/4/2017 1:54 AM, hw wrote: I bought a used HP DL180g6 a couple years ago, 12 x 3.5" on the front panel, and 2 more in back, came with all 14 HP trays, dual X5650.   its a personal/charity server sitting at a coloc here in town.   I have several of the same model server at work with 25 x

Re: [CentOS] low end file server with h/w RAID - recommendations

John R Pierce wrote: On 11/3/2017 1:31 AM, hw wrote: 2.5" SAS drives spinning at 10k and 15k RPM are the performance solution for online storage, like databases and so forth. also make more sense for large arrays of SSDs, as they don't even come in 3.5".With 2.5" you can pack more disks

Re: [CentOS] low end file server with h/w RAID - recommendations

John R Pierce wrote: On 11/3/2017 1:25 AM, hw wrote: That only goes when you buy new. Look at what you can get used, and you´ll see that there´s basically nothing that fits 3.5" drives. I bought a used HP DL180g6 a couple years ago, 12 x 3.5" on the front panel, and 2 more in back, came