Re: [CentOS] Does Huawei break the license of CentOS?

Hello The developer has provided the repository at http://developer.huawei.com/ict/site-euleros/euleros/source/2.2/ I have downloaded some source rpm package from the provided repository, and can see the source file and headers. So I think after finding the location of the source file, this issu

Re: [CentOS] tftpd server S not responding

have you checked that tftp is added to hosts.allow. syslog may be reporting libwrap errors, libwrap is trcpwrappers regards peter On 11 April 2018 16:57:04 "Asif Iqbal" wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Steven Tardy wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] Ansible repository shenanigans in EL7

On 11 April 2018 at 16:11, wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2018 09:48 Fabian Arrotin wrote: > >> On 11/04/18 13:58, James Hogarth wrote: >> > For those not aware ansible has been deprecated in RHEL7 from the extras >> > repository. >> > > In the RHEL specific world it's now in an optional "product" >> > > (

Re: [CentOS] tftpd server S not responding

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Steven Tardy wrote: > >> A STATEFUL firewall with “ip any any” can and will still block asymmetric >> communications due to the firewall keeping track of state (hence tha name >> stateful firewall). >> >>

Re: [CentOS] Ansible repository shenanigans in EL7

On 11 Apr 2018 09:48 Fabian Arrotin wrote: On 11/04/18 13:58, James Hogarth wrote: > For those not aware ansible has been deprecated in RHEL7 from the extras > repository. > > In the RHEL specific world it's now in an optional "product" (basically an > optional subscription) that is part of a

Re: [CentOS] Ansible repository shenanigans in EL7

On 11 April 2018 at 15:39, Leon Fauster wrote: > >> Am 11.04.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Fabian Arrotin : >> ... >> - or we try to build those and continue to provide ansible > > +1 > Honestly I think that would get even more confusing at that point if CentOS Extras has it when RHEL Extras no longer wi

Re: [CentOS] Next major version of Firefox on RHEL/CentOS ?

James Pearson wrote: > > I know CentOS don't have inside info on what Redhat may or may not do in > the future - plus Redhat don't usually announce publicly what their > future plans are - but on the off-chance that someone on this list may know: > > Does anyone know what Redhat are likely to do

Re: [CentOS] Ansible repository shenanigans in EL7

> Am 11.04.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Fabian Arrotin : > ... > - or we try to build those and continue to provide ansible +1 -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Ansible repository shenanigans in EL7

On 11/04/18 13:58, James Hogarth wrote: > For those not aware ansible has been deprecated in RHEL7 from the extras > repository. > > In the RHEL specific world it's now in an optional "product" (basically an > optional subscription) that is part of any RHEL subscription, but it's opt > in. > > As

Re: [CentOS] yum excludes

> > Every yum command returns "nvidia excluding" lines, and those items > are invisible for installation, see lower. > I have no idea where those excludes are defined. > > -- > [root@gbw-d-l0070 ~]# yum update > Loaded plugins: etckeeper, fast

[CentOS] yum excludes

dear all Every yum command returns "nvidia excluding" lines, and those items are invisible for installation, see lower. I have no idea where those excludes are defined. Also, the flag "--disableexcludes=all" does not remove the excludes. any ideas? thanks mathy -

[CentOS] Ansible repository shenanigans in EL7

For those not aware ansible has been deprecated in RHEL7 from the extras repository. In the RHEL specific world it's now in an optional "product" (basically an optional subscription) that is part of any RHEL subscription, but it's opt in. As a result ansible is back in the EPEL7 repository for 2.