On 12/5/18 8:34 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I still can't reason why the lvm tools were scanning the component
volumes to begin with.
I think I've figured it out. The new lvm-tools package appears to have
broken support for detecting dm metadata version 0.90. The update
should be stable for
On 12/5/18 9:27 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
The content of /var/log/messages is here:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/n-E6X76FWIKzIvzPOw97uw
I don't have much new information, other than that I tested booting a
similar system with an intentionally degraded RAID volume. That one
On 12/5/18 11:55 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
The point of RAID1 is to allow for continued uptime in a failure scenario.
When I assemble servers with RAID1, I set up two HDDs to mirror each other,
and test by booting from each drive individually to verify that it works. For
the OS partitions, I use
On 12/5/18 10:48 AM, Ed Morrison wrote:
This is the latest error I am seeing:
[root@localhost ~]# yum check-update
Could not retrieve mirrorlist
http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=7=x86_64=os=stock
error was
14: curl#7 - "Failed connect to mirrorlist.centos.org:80; Operation now in
progress"
On 12/4/18 11:03 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
I could manage to switch to another virtual console, and I have the
following kernel log messages:
WARNING: kernel:perf: interrupt took too long
Can you run "dmesg" and find out if there's any more info? Often there
will be a kernel stack trace
Estimados amigos,
por favor si me pueden ayudar un archivo VSC para subir masivamente
usuarios de correo a un servidor de correo con postfix.
gracias por su ayuda
--
*Rhamyro Alcoser A.*
*Mailto1:* rhamyr...@gmail.com
*¿Qué, pues, diremos a esto? Si Dios es por nosotros, ¿quién contra
On 12/5/18 9:56 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
When running "pvs" on the broken system, no RAID volumes
were listed, only component devices
After updating, look at the output of "pvs" if you use LVM on software
RAID.
What exactly did `pvs' show and instead of what?
It should print:
# pvs
PV
Saludos.
Ya entiendo cuál es el requerimiento. Hay Tres opciones:
1) zimbra1: Haces que el IP del servidor de la aplicación de
facturación haga parte de las redes confiables (MTA Trusted Networks).
Con esto queda habilitado el servidor para que pueda enviar correo sin
autenticarse. Esto es muy
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:38 AM Rob Kampen wrote:
>
> On 5/12/18 7:21 AM, Phil Perry wrote:
> > The only issue I've seen reported that sounds similar or possibly
> > related is:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650634
> Yes, seems this is the laptop issue, will prove
Sent from BlueMail
On 05 Dec 2018, 7:22 AM, at 7:22 AM, Phil Perry wrote:
>On 04/12/2018 09:54, Rob Kampen wrote:
>>
>> So in an effort to narrow down the problem I also have an old Samsung
>
>> laptop - i5 with an nvidia card - all up-to-date 7.5 - I thought I
>would
>> try a more
On Wednesday, December 5, 2018 11:38:50 AM PST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> You might want to point out which list you posted it on since it
> doesn't seem to be this one.
Apparently there's a size limit for emails. I've resent with one of the output
files hosted on a personal webserver and it
(Resend: message didn't show, was my original message too big? Posted one of
the output files to a website to see)
The point of RAID1 is to allow for continued uptime in a failure scenario.
When I assemble servers with RAID1, I set up two HDDs to mirror each other,
and test by booting from
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 14:27, Benjamin Smith wrote:
>
> My gut feeling is that this is related to a RAID1 issue I'm seeing with 7.6.
> See email thread "CentOS 7.6: Software RAID1 fails the only meaningful test"
>
You might want to point out which list you posted it on since it
doesn't seem to be
My gut feeling is that this is related to a RAID1 issue I'm seeing with 7.6.
See email thread "CentOS 7.6: Software RAID1 fails the only meaningful test"
I suggest trying to boot from an earlier kernel. Good luck!
Ben S
On Wednesday, December 5, 2018 9:27:22 AM PST Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
Gracias Carlos el problema es que la aplicación de factiracion no permite usar
envió con tls o ssl.
De echo el servidor tienen instalado un certificado letscript
Saludos
César Martínez M.
Ingeniero de Sistemas
Proyectos de Software Libre
Servicom
Móvil 0999374317
Enviado desde mi móvil
Saludos.
Ahora es una necesidad que los servidores de correo usen SSL para
enviar correos (comunicarse con otros servidores). De otra forma, les
asignan una reputación pobre y se tienen muchos problemas de entrega.
Además es una necesidad para proteger las contraseñas de los usuarios.
Un
Hi Everyone:
I have been fighting this all morning. I did a new (several) installs of
CentOS7. Yum will not update the system. I have disabled ipv6, set
yum.conf to use IPv4 only, disabled firewalld, disabled selinux, used both
static ip and dhcp for network connectivity. I can ping any where
Le 05/12/2018 à 08:31, Phil Perry a écrit :
> If you are confident in the state of sda, I would remove sdb from the
> array, copy the partition table from sda to sdb as Stephen suggested
> earlier, then add sdb back to the array and allow the data to be synced:
>
> For example:
>
> mdadm --fail
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 13:00, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 10:17, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
>
> Can you post what they are missing? Without that info it is not clear
> what the problem is (I seem to have several of them installed on an
> upgrade so I am not sure what
Saludos amigos tengo un servidor zimbra 8.8.10 el cuál esta funcionando
bien, ahora por temas de facturación se a implementado un sistema el
cuál necesita enviar emails pero este sistema no soporta TLS o SSl, la
pregunta es:
Existe alguna forma de configurar zimbra para que el envió de emails
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 10:17, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Can you post what they are missing? Without that info it is not clear
what the problem is (I seem to have several of them installed on an
upgrade so I am not sure what blocked you).
Stephen,
Here is the full result. Part of the problem
> I've started updating systems to CentOS 7.6, and so far I have one
> failure.
>
> This system has two peculiarities which might have triggered the
> problem. The first is that one of the software RAID arrays on this
> system is degraded. While troubleshooting the problem, I saw similar
> error
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 12:06, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
> Hi all... Great work on 7.6!
>
> I updated a number of boxes - all good! This "one" server I lost connection
> through the internet or something... Anyway 702 transactions left and its
> not happy. When I run yum-complete-transaction I get "many"
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 12:06:06 -0500
Jerry Geis wrote:
> This "one" server I lost connection
> through the internet or something...
Not of any direct help to you now, but I learned the hard way that it's always
wise to run yum in a screen session when updating anything other than your
local
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 10:17, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
> To all,
>
> I started the process of updating some of our systems from 7.5 to 7.6.
> Most of the servers had no problems, but several of the desktops had
> some difficulties. I was required to perform several yum commands to
> update as
I've started updating systems to CentOS 7.6, and so far I have one failure.
This system has two peculiarities which might have triggered the
problem. The first is that one of the software RAID arrays on this
system is degraded. While troubleshooting the problem, I saw similar
error messages
Hi all... Great work on 7.6!
I updated a number of boxes - all good! This "one" server I lost connection
through the internet or something... Anyway 702 transactions left and its
not happy. When I run yum-complete-transaction I get "many"
Removing man-db.x86_64 0:2.6.3-9.el7 - ud from the
To all,
I started the process of updating some of our systems from 7.5 to 7.6.
Most of the servers had no problems, but several of the desktops had
some difficulties. I was required to perform several yum commands to
update as much as possible in the format of yum update a* then b* etc.
Then
On 12/05/2018 07:46 AM, Klaus Kolle wrote:
Hi
I just upgraded a virtual Centos from 7.5 to 7.6 and now the VirtualBox
Extensions won't compile with the kernel.
I looked into the log file and found that I should try to execute:
make oldconfig && make prepare
but I get this result:
Hi
I just upgraded a virtual Centos from 7.5 to 7.6 and now the VirtualBox
Extensions won't compile with the kernel.
I looked into the log file and found that I should try to execute:
make oldconfig && make prepare
but I get this result:
scripts/kconfig/conf --oldconfig Kconfig
#
#
Hello List,
thanks for the answer
Am Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2018, 21:59:58 CET schrieb Alexander Dalloz:
> Am 04.12.2018 um 21:30 schrieb Günther J. Niederwimmer:
> > Hello,
> > is this only my mistake,or can help any from the list?
> >
> > I have 3 host computer on different places, but all
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 02:02, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just updated my installation media for CentOS. I have a few sandbox
> PCs in my office, and I'm testing CentOS 7.6 1810 on them. There seem to
> be a few issues with the CentOS 7.6 1810 DVD.
>
> Checked DVD integrity on startup :
Il 05/12/18 11:33, Alessandro Baggi ha scritto:
Hi list,
I'm trying to understand SELinux on C7.
I encountered problem running bacula when system is enforced.
The problem is when bacula try to run BeforeJobScript. In this script
there is an occourrence to systemctl stop httpd and hostname
Hi list,
I'm trying to understand SELinux on C7.
I encountered problem running bacula when system is enforced.
The problem is when bacula try to run BeforeJobScript. In this script
there is an occourrence to systemctl stop httpd and hostname command and
I got error on permission on this 2
On 5/12/18 7:21 AM, Phil Perry wrote:
On 04/12/2018 09:54, Rob Kampen wrote:
So in an effort to narrow down the problem I also have an old Samsung
laptop - i5 with an nvidia card - all up-to-date 7.5 - I thought I
would try a more conservative upgrade approach.
first updated to the CR
On 5/12/18 5:30 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:54:58PM +1300, Rob Kampen wrote:
So in an effort to narrow down the problem I also have an old Samsung laptop
- i5 with an nvidia card - all up-to-date 7.5 - I thought I would try a more
conservative upgrade approach.
On 5/12/18 4:17 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
On 4/12/18 9:06 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Sorry for top post, my android BlueMail will not let me insert at the
bottom.
I have found that tracker-extract seems to trigger a segfault. I note
this is not updated in CR, but comes from base. Removal of tracker
37 matches
Mail list logo
