Re: [CentOS] Curl spec file

2019-01-23 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Jan 23, 2019, at 16:55, Roee Agami wrote: > > Hi, > I saw this spec file for curl-7.29: > https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!curl.git/c7/SPECS!curl.spec > > And was wondering if you have one for a later version. > And if not, how hard is it to modify the existing one to support later >

Re: [CentOS] Curl spec file

2019-01-23 Thread Roee Agami
Thanks! Although I'm looking for a spec file, not the RPM itself as I need to make some changes to it. Roee. On 1/23/19, 6:02 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Alice Wonder" wrote: On 1/23/19 1:55 PM, Roee Agami wrote: > Hi, > I saw this spec file for curl-7.29: >

Re: [CentOS] Curl spec file

2019-01-23 Thread Alice Wonder
On 1/23/19 1:55 PM, Roee Agami wrote: Hi, I saw this spec file for curl-7.29: https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!curl.git/c7/SPECS!curl.spec And was wondering if you have one for a later version. And if not, how hard is it to modify the existing one to support later versions. Thanks! Roee.

[CentOS] C7, and my RAID

2019-01-23 Thread mark
Ok, I think my only choice at this point is to delete and recreate the RAID, then restore from backup (oy, 7TB). I see that I can do an mdadm --remove /dev/md0, then, the page I see that on, suggests zeroing the superblocks. What would happen if I *don't* zero the superblocks before doing an

[CentOS] Curl spec file

2019-01-23 Thread Roee Agami
Hi, I saw this spec file for curl-7.29: https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!curl.git/c7/SPECS!curl.spec And was wondering if you have one for a later version. And if not, how hard is it to modify the existing one to support later versions. Thanks! Roee.

[CentOS] Where is everyone?

2019-01-23 Thread mark
There's usually a lot more traffic here. Just today, I've started wondering if a lot of folks who are usually here are on furlough, with the US gov't shutdown If so, my condolences, folks. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] C7 and mdadm -( not solved)

2019-01-23 Thread Ulf Volmer
On 23.01.19 21:26, mark wrote: > Does anyone know if the actual physical position in the hot-swap bays > affects how mdadm tries to assemble a drive? mdadm --assemble scans alls drives for the superblock. Drives are known by device uuids. The physical position does not matter. Best regards Ulf

Re: [CentOS] C7 and mdadm -( not solved)

2019-01-23 Thread mark
Does anyone know if the actual physical position in the hot-swap bays affects how mdadm tries to assemble a drive? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] dmarc auth on incoming email

2019-01-23 Thread Jari Fredriksson
> Fred Smith kirjoitti 26.4.2018 kello 3.21: > > Just reading up on DMARC, toying with setting it up to auth against > incoming emails. (but not configure my domain to use dmarc, or at least > not yet) > > ran into an article about opendmarc, which is available on epel. but > when I took a

Re: [CentOS] C7 and mdadm - apparently SOLVED (well, not)

2019-01-23 Thread mark
mark wrote: > Looking around on the Web, what I just tried was to stop the RAID, then > do an --assemble --scan, and *that* found everything, put the raid > together, and appears to be rebuilding using the new drive. > > *phew* > > > I do find it interesting that scan works, but explicitly

[CentOS] C7 radeon driver

2019-01-23 Thread mark
Hi, folks, We've been recently (the last few months) having issues on workstations with the radeon driver. A typical sample is this, from /var/log/messages: Jan 23 11:35:32 kernel: radeon :03:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than 1msec Jan 23 11:35:32 kernel: radeon :03:00.0: GPU

Re: [CentOS] C7 and mdadm - apparently SOLVED

2019-01-23 Thread mark
Looking around on the Web, what I just tried was to stop the RAID, then do an --assemble --scan, and *that* found everything, put the raid together, and appears to be rebuilding using the new drive. *phew* I do find it interesting that scan works, but explicitly assembling apparently remembers