Re: [CentOS] C7, mdadm issues

2019-01-31 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Il 31/01/19 07:34, Simon Matter ha scritto: Il 30/01/19 16:49, Simon Matter ha scritto: On 01/30/19 03:45, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Il 29/01/19 20:42, mark ha scritto: Alessandro Baggi wrote: Il 29/01/19 18:47, mark ha scritto: Alessandro Baggi wrote: Il 29/01/19 15:03, mark ha scritto: I'

Re: [CentOS] Bacula 9.4.1 Dbdriver issue

2019-01-31 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Il 28/01/19 12:53, J. Echter ha scritto: Am 25.01.19 um 13:13 schrieb Alessandro Baggi: Hi list, I created my rpm for Bacula 9.4.1 reading centos srpm spec files. I made a single package and not split in several packages because this is my first rpm so I created my spec file taking a cue from

Re: [CentOS] Applying changes to route-eth0

2019-01-31 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 1/30/19 12:51 PM, mark wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have a series of static routes in route-eth0 Recently I had to made changes and could not find an effective way to get the old routes out and the new routes in. ifdown-route seems to apply the content of route-eth0 to take down the r

Re: [CentOS] EPEL repo problem

2019-01-31 Thread Günther J . Niederwimmer
Hello, my test have this ./check_metalink --repo epel --check-master Testing repo=epel, arch=i386 Metalink provided by: proxy02.fedoraproject.org Server date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:05:26 GMT Repo epel, arch i386 errored: list index out of range Testing repo=epel, arch=x86_64

Re: [CentOS] EPEL repo problem

2019-01-31 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 09:12, Günther J. Niederwimmer wrote: > Hello, > > my test have this > ./check_metalink --repo epel --check-master > > Argh I missed the problem until now. ./check_metalink --repo=epel-6 --check-master [will test i386 and x86_64] ./check_metalink --repo=epel-7 --check-mas

Re: [CentOS] centos dfcp send hostname to microsoft dhcp/dns

2019-01-31 Thread Ralf Prengel
> Am 30.01.2019 um 13:03 schrieb Liam O'Toole : > > I see you're using network-manager. Does the file > /var/lib/NetworkManager/dhclient-.conf contain a line > beginning with 'send host-name'? > Hallo, problem is solved now. Thanks for your help. Ralf _

Re: [CentOS] C7, firewalld and rich rules

2019-01-31 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 1/30/19 10:05 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: Did you look at Shorewall? IMHO that's what is best used in such situations and it works since many years now. shorewall doesn't support nftables, which is largely the point of firewalld:  The Linux firewall system is currently undergoing ye

Re: [CentOS] C7, firewalld and rich rules

2019-01-31 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> On 1/30/19 10:05 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >> Did you look at Shorewall? IMHO that's what is best used in such >> situations and it works since many years now. > > > shorewall doesn't support nftables, which is largely the point of > firewalld:  The Linux firewall system is currently und

Re: [CentOS] C7, firewalld and rich rules

2019-01-31 Thread mark
Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 1/30/19 10:05 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > >> Did you look at Shorewall? IMHO that's what is best used in such >> situations and it works since many years now. > > shorewall doesn't support nftables, which is largely the point of > firewalld:  The Linux firewall s

Re: [CentOS] C7, firewalld and rich rules

2019-01-31 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 13:13, mark wrote: > Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 1/30/19 10:05 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > > > >> Did you look at Shorewall? IMHO that's what is best used in such > >> situations and it works since many years now. > > > > shorewall doesn't support nftables, which

Re: [CentOS] C7, firewalld and rich rules

2019-01-31 Thread Warren Young
On Jan 31, 2019, at 11:12 AM, mark wrote: > > Why would *ANYONE* think that everyone should just start from scratch, > taking all the time in the world to get it converted? If the conversion were simple enough to be easily automated, the new system is probably no more than just a syntactic diff

Re: [CentOS] C7, firewalld and rich rules

2019-01-31 Thread mark
Ok, I've found something that will work - adding --direct rules. That, I can do via iptables-save | a 10-line awk script. A question, though: in iptables, we've got INPUT and FORWARD defined as using the same chain. Is there a way to do that with firewalld - it's not clear from what I'm reading.

Re: [CentOS] C7, firewalld and rich rules

2019-01-31 Thread mark
Warren Young wrote: > On Jan 31, 2019, at 11:12 AM, mark wrote: >> >> Why would *ANYONE* think that everyone should just start from scratch, >> taking all the time in the world to get it converted? > > If the conversion were simple enough to be easily automated, the new > system is probably no mor

Re: [CentOS] C7, firewalld and rich rules

2019-01-31 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 17:43, mark wrote: > Warren Young wrote: > > > It’s much the same as asking why there aren’t automatic programming > > language conversion tools: we wouldn’t need more than one programming > > language if they all mapped 1:1 to each other, short of going down to the > > mac