The price we pay.. :)
BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and will
self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround in fact
until RH catches up):
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/
--
Sent from the Delta qua
> The price we pay.. :)
Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages?
Regards,
Simon
>
> BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and
> will self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround
> in fact until RH catches u
No, it's the "price" we "pay" for using EL.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Simon Matter"
> To: "Nux!"
> Cc: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Thursday, 9 May, 2019 09:09:13
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 17:48, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-05-08 15:05, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:48, Valeri Galtsev
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2019-05-08 12:28, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:24, mark wrote:
> >>
>
> >
On 5/8/19 8:42 AM, mark wrote:
> Hi, Johnny,
>
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote:
>>>
>>> Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as
>>> upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of
>>> servers whether gssproxy keeps SE
On 5/8/19 11:23 AM, mark wrote:
> Hi, Johnny,
>
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote:
>>>
>>> Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as
>>> upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of
>>> servers whether gssproxy keeps S
On 5/7/19 9:07 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> This morning Red Hat announced the general availability of Red Hat
> Enterprise Linux 8.
>
> More details at
> https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-every-enterprise-every-cloud-every-workload?sc_cid=701f201OIIOAA4
>
>
Once upon a time, Johnny Hughes said:
> We obviously can not yet make an educated guess on WHEN this process
> might or might not be completed .. or WHEN the new version will be
> available.
So, next Tuesday then? :)
Thanks for the update, and all the hard work!
--
Chris Adams
___
On May 9, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> As an initial goal, we would love to have a release in a month ..
That’s about the average time for 7.x releases, which I assume are far less
work to get out than a point-zero.
Is this goal realistic?
I’d consider any ship date before about
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 11:56, Warren Young wrote:
> On May 9, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> > As an initial goal, we would love to have a release in a month ..
>
> That’s about the average time for 7.x releases, which I assume are far
> less work to get out than a point-zero.
>
> I
On 5/9/19 11:03 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 11:56, Warren Young wrote:
>
>> On May 9, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> As an initial goal, we would love to have a release in a month ..
>>
>> That’s about the average time for 7.x releases, which I assume
On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
The price we pay.. :)
Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages?
Regards,
Simon
No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's
a priority for them.
___
use yum plugin protectbase to protect main centos repositories and then you
can use whatever other repos you want, without worrying they will overwrite
"base" centos packages - this should resolve your problem
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 8:42 AM Gary Stainburn
wrote:
> I'm going to rebuild my worksta
El Miércoles 08/05/2019 a las 05:42, Gary Stainburn escribió:
> I'm going to rebuild my workstation because maintaining it is now a
> nightmare after using "recommended" repo's that now conflict with each
> other. Every time I do a yum update I it fails with conflicts.
>
> I'm looking for new reco
> On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
>>> The price we pay.. :)
>>
>> Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox
>> packages?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Simon
>>
>
> No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's
> a priority for them.
Which ma
it's used for running HPCs a lot
On 5/9/19 10:40 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
The price we pay.. :)
Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox
packages?
Regards,
Simon
No, Red Hat have not yet released any updat
Good afternoon from Singapore,
When will CentOS 8.0 be released?
Thank you.
-BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE-
The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):
[The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of
U.S. Embassy Workers
Link:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/scie
On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 05:46 +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Good afternoon from Singapore,
>
>
> When will CentOS 8.0 be released?
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> -BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE-
>
> The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):
>
> [The New York Times] Microwave Wea
On 10/05/2019 06:46, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
Good afternoon from Singapore,
When will CentOS 8.0 be released?
https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi
Hello Turritopsis,
On Fri, 10 May 2019 05:46:20 + Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Good afternoon from Singapore,
>
>
> When will CentOS 8.0 be released?
You've just started yet another thread on this topic, asking the same
question. Please search the archives first, you'll get
20 matches
Mail list logo
