On Jul 1, 2019, at 9:10 AM, mark wrote:
>
> ZFS with a zpoolZ2
You mean raidz2.
> which we set up using the LSI card set to JBOD
Some LSI cards require a complete firmware re-flash to get them into “IT mode”
which completely does away with the RAID logic and turns them into dumb SATA
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 4:37 PM Jonathan Billings
wrote:
> I never was able to find a bootable FreeDOS image that could run it from a
> USB boot disk.
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-May/134512.html
___
CentOS mailing list
El 2019-07-01 17:46, David González Romero escribió:
Yo creo que iredmail tiene un sistema de configuración web que te
permite
hacer eso... no obstane siempre en Postfix puedes crear cualquier
filtro.
Lo ideal sería hacerlo con el Postfixadmin si es que lo permite, de lo
contrario tendrás que
On Jul 1, 2019, at 16:47, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> So far it looks like not many people here if any at all, use
> fwupd/LVFS which is a bit surprising to me since this if
> what Redhat promote as a solution universally supported by
> increasingly more hardware vendors.
> I do upgrade
Yo creo que iredmail tiene un sistema de configuración web que te permite
hacer eso... no obstane siempre en Postfix puedes crear cualquier filtro.
Lo ideal sería hacerlo con el Postfixadmin si es que lo permite, de lo
contrario tendrás que hacer uso de las tablas locales para eso, pero es
On 01/07/2019 17:42, lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> hi guys
>
> does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant?
> I was hoping you can tell whether HPE support Linux Vendor
> Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants'
> BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr?
>
> many thanks, L.
>
>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 12:58:12PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> So what's wrong with using DOS to update firmware? DOS is a small
> and simple program loader that's unlikely to require much in the way
> of hardware to work and is unlikely to be infected by a virus in
> today's world.
Honestly,
On 2019-07-01 14:15, mark wrote:
Frank Cox wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 19:38:29 +0100
lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
I also a few years ago got Dell's tech support telling me to
do MS-DOS stuff in order to update BIOS.
So what's wrong with using DOS to update firmware? DOS is a small and
Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 19:38:29 +0100
> lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
>
>> I also a few years ago got Dell's tech support telling me to
>> do MS-DOS stuff in order to update BIOS.
>
> So what's wrong with using DOS to update firmware? DOS is a small and
> simple program loader that's
Hi,
We had some DL380-Gen10 on production, firmware updates are made via iLO!
Then boot after it is done, on Dell (with OMSA) we can update from linux
and boot after, same thing on my point of view.
Att.,
Antonio.
Em seg, 1 de jul de 2019 às 14:12, lejeczek via CentOS
lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> On 01/07/2019 18:38, mark wrote:
>> lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
>>>
>>> does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant? I was hoping you can tell
>>> whether HPE support Linux Vendor
>>> Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants'
>>> BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr?
Hola necesito configurar filtro por dominios a la entrada y salida de
correos
por ejemplo que una determinda cuenta de correo tenga aceso a el envio y
recepcion de correos solamente de unos dominios
les cuento que mi servidor de correo es iredmail sobre centos 7
saludos y espero su ayuda
--
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 19:38:29 +0100
lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> I also a few years ago got Dell's tech support telling me to
> do MS-DOS stuff in order to update BIOS.
So what's wrong with using DOS to update firmware? DOS is a small and simple
program loader that's unlikely to require much in
On 01/07/2019 18:38, mark wrote:
> lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
>> hi guys
>>
>> does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant? I was hoping you can tell whether
>> HPE support Linux Vendor
>> Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants'
>> BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr?
>>
>>
> Dunno 'bout
lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> hi guys
>
> does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant? I was hoping you can tell whether
> HPE support Linux Vendor
> Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants'
> BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr?
>
>
Dunno 'bout "Linux Vendor Firmware Service", but HPE
Warren Young wrote on 7/1/2019 9:48 AM:
On Jul 1, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:
I've never used ZFS, as its Linux support has been historically poor.
When was the last time you checked?
The ZFS-on-Linux (ZoL) code has been stable for years. In recent months, the
BSDs have rebased
hi guys
does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant?
I was hoping you can tell whether HPE support Linux Vendor
Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants'
BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr?
many thanks, L.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1624 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1624
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1604 Critical
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1604
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1619 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1619
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2019:1612
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:1612
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1626 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1626
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1603 Critical
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1603
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
On 2019-07-01 10:10, mark wrote:
I haven't been following this thread closely, but some of them have left
me puzzled.
1. Hardware RAID: other than Rocket RAID, who don't seem to support a card
more than about 3 years (i used to have to update and rebuild the
drivers), anything LSI based,
Speaking of ZFS, got a weird one: we were testing ZFS (ok, it was on
Ubuntu, but that shouldn't make a difference, I would think). and I've got
a zpool z2. I pulled one drive, to simulate a drive failure, and it
rebuilt with the hot spare. Then I pushed the drive I'd pulled back in...
and it does
On 2019-07-01 10:01, Warren Young wrote:
On Jul 1, 2019, at 8:26 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
RAID function, which boils down to simple, short, easy to debug well program.
I didn't intend to start software vs hardware RAID flame war when I
joined somebody's else opinion.
Now, commenting
You seem to be saying that hardware RAID can’t lose data. You’re ignoring the
RAID 5 write hole:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID#WRITE-HOLE
If you then bring up battery backups, now you’re adding cost to the system.
And then some ~3-5 years later, downtime to swap the battery, and
I haven't been following this thread closely, but some of them have left
me puzzled.
1. Hardware RAID: other than Rocket RAID, who don't seem to support a card
more than about 3 years (i used to have to update and rebuild the
drivers), anything LSI based, which includes Dell PERC, have been
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Warren Young wrote:
If you then bring up battery backups, now you’re adding cost to the system.
And then some ~3-5 years later, downtime to swap the battery, and more
downtime. And all of that just to work around the RAID write hole.
Although batteries have disappeared
On Jul 1, 2019, at 8:26 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> RAID function, which boils down to simple, short, easy to debug well program.
RAID firmware will be harder to debug than Linux software RAID, if only because
of easier-to-use tools.
Furthermore, MD RAID only had to be debugged once, rather
On Jul 1, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:
>
> I've never used ZFS, as its Linux support has been historically poor.
When was the last time you checked?
The ZFS-on-Linux (ZoL) code has been stable for years. In recent months, the
BSDs have rebased their offerings from Illumos to ZoL.
On July 1, 2019 8:56:35 AM CDT, Blake Hudson wrote:
>
>
>Warren Young wrote on 6/28/2019 6:53 PM:
>> On Jun 28, 2019, at 8:46 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:
>>> Linux software RAID…has only decreased availability for me. This has
>been due to a combination of hardware and software issues that are are
Warren Young wrote on 6/28/2019 6:53 PM:
On Jun 28, 2019, at 8:46 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:
Linux software RAID…has only decreased availability for me. This has been due
to a combination of hardware and software issues that are are generally handled
well by HW RAID controllers, but are often
Hi All - I have a CentOS 7 (image) that is fully updated. However its not
UEFI.
Is there a way to use an older computer and migrate my current image to be
UEFI so this new UEFI only computer I have will boot. Was hoping to not
have to completely re-install and setup for my needs.
Jerry
Well, the router I've had for some years now, that I had DD-WRT on, borked
itself. Went out and bought a new one, an Asus RT-AC66U. Now, I've got
this 11 yr old cute HP Laserjet... and it's a winprinter. With the version
of the DD-WRT I had, all I had to do was send the magic M$ data to it, it
Hi, All
There is following issue in latest libvirt-4.5.0-10.el7_6.12 package, which
could prevent live VM migrations with web sockets enabled, when libvirtd
were restarted prior to migration.
Environment:
# uname -a
Linux inv-cp1-hv3-centos7 3.10.0-957.12.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 14
21:24:32
Hello Kevin,
Thank you in advance for the reply. Will mark XSA-274 as fixed for us.
> On Jun 28, 2019, at 6:47 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
>
> Looks like this never got a response from anyone.
>
> On 6/25/19 10:15 AM, Yuriy Kohut wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Are XSA-289 and XSA-274/CVE-2018-14678
37 matches
Mail list logo
