On Wed, 2019-07-03 at 19:12 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> I'm probably missing something really simple.
>
> I've installed an RH8 IAM in AWS and I'm trying to build packages on
> it.
> I've noticed there are many *-devel packages that I cannot install:
>
>
On 2019-07-03 19:12, Florin Andrei wrote:
I've installed an RH8 IAM in AWS and I'm trying to build packages on
I meant an RH8 AMI.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
I'm probably missing something really simple.
I've installed an RH8 IAM in AWS and I'm trying to build packages on it.
I've noticed there are many *-devel packages that I cannot install:
[ec2-user@site1-vpn ~]$ sudo yum install trousers-devel
Last
On 7/3/19 1:43 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> AFAIK CentOS uses RedHat's source RPMs for building the next CentOS
> release. I am not sure about the bootstrap procedure and the infra-
> structure packages, so lets put these corner cases aside.
>
> RedHat's "regular" binary and source
Paul,
Virgo, Paul E. (GSFC-610.2)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] wrote:
>
> I did go into the BIOS to see if that made any difference, and didn't see
> anything to set/unset . That was the problem.
Please don't top post.
One more thought: did you just go system setup->BIOS, or did you check the
other two
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:1651
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:1651
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1650 Low
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1650
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1652 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1652
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2019:1653
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:1653
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
some light reading
https://www.redhat.com/licenses/Appendix_1_Global_English_20190625.pdf
Dan Pacek
> On Jul 3, 2019, at 11:11 AM, Mark Rousell wrote:
>
> On 03/07/2019 15:58, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> RHEL binary packages are only available to paid customers who are explicitly
>>
James,
Actually we noticed that we've been running some old setup for our PXE
boot/kickstart setup, so we're going to try just doing
it with UEFI and see where that gets us.
PEV
From: James Peltier
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 10:47 AM
To: Virgo, Paul E.
Mark,
I did go into the BIOS to see if that made any difference, and didn't see
anything to set/unset . That was the problem.
PEV
From: mark
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 10:41 AM
To: Virgo, Paul E. (GSFC-610.2)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]; CentOS mailing list
Subject:
On 03/07/2019 15:58, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> RHEL binary packages are only available to paid customers who are explicitly
> prohibited to redistribute them.
For the sake of completeness, not everyone with legitimate access to
RHEL binaries is necessarily a *paid* customer. Red Hat provides a
On July 3, 2019 1:43:40 AM CDT, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>AFAIK CentOS uses RedHat's source RPMs for building the next CentOS
>release. I am not sure about the bootstrap procedure and the infra-
>structure packages, so lets put these corner cases aside.
>
>RedHat's "regular" binary
Virgo, Paul E. \(GSFC-610.2\)\[ADNET SYSTEMS INC\] via CentOS wrote:
> All,
>
> Seems like the latest CentOS 7.6 and I are not playing well together,
> these days.
>
> I'm attempting to use our pxeboot setup to install the latest CentOS 7 on
> a Dell PowerEdge R830. The install starts then gets to
All,
Seems like the latest CentOS 7.6 and I are not playing well together, these
days.
I'm attempting to use our pxeboot setup to install the latest CentOS 7 on a
Dell PowerEdge R830. The install starts then gets to a certain point and
hangs. That certain point is: FADT indicates ASPM is
On Jul 3, 2019, at 12:43 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Are RedHat's binary RPMs "poisoned" somehow, making it impossible for
> CentOS to redistribute RedHat's *binary* packages without going to jail?
RHEL binaries are only available to those with a RHEL subscription. I don’t
see anything in
As I understand it the rebuild only removes RedHat copyrighted
artifacts like their name and logo.
This is also why the release notes refer to 'upstream' rather than
RedHat by name (not that I studied it in depth recently)
The only 'poison' here is copyright, which CentOS avoids by removing
these
Hi folks,
AFAIK CentOS uses RedHat's source RPMs for building the next CentOS
release. I am not sure about the bootstrap procedure and the infra-
structure packages, so lets put these corner cases aside.
RedHat's "regular" binary and source packages are based on open source
(GPL2, GPL3, Apache
19 matches
Mail list logo
