[CentOS] CentOS Net Install

2019-12-13 Thread Mark LaPierre
Hey all, Is a Network Install ISO planed any time in the near future for CentOS 8? I don't see it in the mirrors, but that might be a function of my poor searching abilities. -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ___

Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?

2019-12-13 Thread Pete Biggs
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 16:44 +, Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article <5c2439dc6351659900b0c7ef421ae3f1e7b84fe4.ca...@biggs.org.uk>, > Pete Biggs wrote: > > > is what is annoying me. That seems to be what I would expect if I > > > piped it to less. I checked a fedora 31 and another centos 8 box

Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?

2019-12-13 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article <5c2439dc6351659900b0c7ef421ae3f1e7b84fe4.ca...@biggs.org.uk>, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > is what is annoying me. That seems to be what I would expect if I > > piped it to less. I checked a fedora 31 and another centos 8 box and > > am seeing the same behaviour. Am I missing somethin

Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?

2019-12-13 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article , Mauricio Tavares wrote: > Comparing the output of systemctl between centos 7 and 8: > > [...] > > So far so good. Don't know why it is complaining about log being > rotated but output looks readable. Now, let's grab a centos8 box: > > [raub@vmhost2 ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release > Cen

Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?

2019-12-13 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 11:40, Warren Young wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2019, at 9:27 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > It seems this became the default at some point. > > > > systemctl -l --no-pager > > > > is the way to get it without that. The whole does it use a pager, does > > it ellipse, etc

Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?

2019-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 13, 2019, at 9:39 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > You can fix the symptom with the software as delivered: Also, there’s this bit in the default .bashrc on EL8: # Uncomment the following line if you don't like systemctl's auto-paging feature: # export SYSTEMD_PAGER= _

Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?

2019-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 13, 2019, at 9:27 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > It seems this became the default at some point. > > systemctl -l --no-pager > > is the way to get it without that. The whole does it use a pager, does > it ellipse, etc has been a long fight where various people complain > enough to g

Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?

2019-12-13 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 11:11, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > > Comparing the output of systemctl between centos 7 and 8: > > [root@mail ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) > [root@mail ~]# systemctl status firewalld > ● firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall dae

Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?

2019-12-13 Thread Pete Biggs
> > is what is annoying me. That seems to be what I would expect if I > piped it to less. I checked a fedora 31 and another centos 8 box and > am seeing the same behaviour. Am I missing something? > The environment variable $PAGER determines what pager to use. The default is 'less'. User

[CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?

2019-12-13 Thread Mauricio Tavares
Comparing the output of systemctl between centos 7 and 8: [root@mail ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) [root@mail ~]# systemctl status firewalld ● firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; en

Re: [CentOS] tomcat package and repo for centos8

2019-12-13 Thread Richard G
Hi Rainer On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 2:34 PM Rainer Traut wrote: > Is there any other third party repository which builds tomcat for > centos/rhel 8? I intend to build tomcat 8 and 9 for CentOS 8 in my harbottle-main repo ( https://harbottle.gitlab.io/harbottle-main ), just as I did for CentOS 7, b

[CentOS] tomcat package and repo for centos8

2019-12-13 Thread Rainer Traut
Hi all, sadly there is no epel tomcat package so far. As per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745960 there is no progress for three months. Is there any other third party repository which builds tomcat for centos/rhel 8? Thx Rainer ___ Cen

Re: [CentOS] log4j12 package in CentOS 8

2019-12-13 Thread Richard G
The weird thing is that I can see the package right here in the repo!: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8/AppStream/x86_64/os/Packages/ What am I misunderstanding? On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 8:04 PM Richard G wrote: > > According to the RHEL docs, package log4j was replaced with package > log4j12 in

Re: [CentOS] DebugInfo repo broken on purpose

2019-12-13 Thread Fabian Arrotin
On 13/12/2019 02:09, Warren Young wrote: > This line in /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Debuginfo.repo > > baseurl=http://debuginfo.centos.org/$releasever/$basearch/ > > …causes commands like “yum search --enablerepo=* foo” to fail with the > obscure error > > Error: Failed to synchronize cach

Re: [CentOS] DebugInfo repo broken on purpose

2019-12-13 Thread Kay Diederichs
On 12/13/19 2:09 AM, Warren Young wrote: > This line in /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Debuginfo.repo > > baseurl=http://debuginfo.centos.org/$releasever/$basearch/ > > …causes commands like “yum search --enablerepo=* foo” to fail with the > obscure error > > Error: Failed to synchronize cach