On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:36:03PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw wrote:
> >
> > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems
> > over unreliable
> > connections?
>
> I don’t have a good answer for you, because if you’d asked me
> without all thi
> That's what I thought. Should I make a bug report? Sshfs is clearly
> intended
> to reconnect automatically when mounted like that, and it doesn't do that.
Not so clearly. Look at the sshfs reconnect option, and also ssh/ssfs
ServerAliveInterval/ServerAliveCountMax.
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:36:03 AM CEST Warren Young wrote:
> On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw wrote:
> > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems over
> > unreliable connections?
>
> I don’t have a good answer for you, because if you’d asked me without all
> this backstory
3 matches
Mail list logo