Il 16/06/20 08:11, Alessandro Baggi ha scritto:
Il 16/06/20 06:21, Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
On 6/15/20 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote:
If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up. But
during boot, it doesn't and I
get the resulting errors below.
Jun 15 21:17:28 dream httpd[15
Il 16/06/20 06:21, Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
On 6/15/20 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote:
If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up. But
during boot, it doesn't and I
get the resulting errors below.
Jun 15 21:17:28 dream httpd[1534]: (99)Cannot assign requested
address: AH00072:
Chris,
CW> I don't have any lines in my configuration file for any of the servers,
CW> how can I tell what the default protocols are?
you may want to add
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m.%R
to the "global" part of your smb.conf.
The %R gives "the selected protocol level after protocol
On 6/15/20 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote:
If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up. But during boot,
it doesn't and I
get the resulting errors below.
Jun 15 21:17:28 dream httpd[1534]: (99)Cannot assign requested address:
AH00072: make_sock: could
not bind to address 10.20.30.11:
On 6/15/2020 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote:
Jun 15 21:17:28 dream httpd[1534]: (99)Cannot assign requested address:
AH00072: make_sock: could
not bind to address 10.20.30.11:80
Could some transient service be holding port 80 at that time?
You could probably arrange to run a script that runs "lsof -
I have always had exactly the same problem. I had to write a script and
run it at boot time:
sleep 10
/usr/bin/systemctl start httpd
Must be some timing problem with the interface addresses not being set
up in time.
Alan
On 16/06/2020 14:06, Jay Hart wrote:
If I do 'systemctl start httpd',
If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up. But during boot,
it doesn't and I
get the resulting errors below.
Jun 15 21:17:28 dream httpd[1534]: (99)Cannot assign requested address:
AH00072: make_sock: could
not bind to address 10.20.30.11:80
Jun 15 21:17:28 dream httpd[1534]:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 8:12 PM Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
>
>
> Il 12/06/20 18:59, Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
> > On 6/12/20 2:16 AM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> >> Do we need an upgrade 😊?
> >
> >
> > Can you restate your question so that it's clear what version you are
> > running, what hardware
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:28:17PM -0400, H wrote:
> I just installed C7 on a new computer and despite Simple Scan being installed
> as part of C7, I have not been able to get it to recognize my Canon scanner
> connected to a USB port. I did have it running on another computer with C7 so
> there
I just installed C7 on a new computer and despite Simple Scan being installed
as part of C7, I have not been able to get it to recognize my Canon scanner
connected to a USB port. I did have it running on another computer with C7 so
there should not be any inherent issues.
On a lark I installed
On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 09:20 +0200, Robin Lee wrote:
> Today when I ran yum update two packages came up microcode_ctl
> and unbound-libs. The updating process went fine until it outputted
>
> Running transaction
> Updating : 2:microcode_ctl-2.1-61.6.el7_8.x86_64
>
> then it just froze. I coul
I don't have any lines in my configuration file for any of the servers,
how can I tell what the default protocols are?
Are the defaults controlled by samba or the kernel?
Chris
On 6/15/2020 2:13 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Christopher Wensink wrote:
>> I hav
I burned a total of 7.55Gb from an ISO image to a dual-layer HP DVD+R disc.
I got a bootable USB stick containing 8.1 and it's 7.65 Gb so apparently my ISO
image file
is messed up.
I was able to install C8 just fine from the USB stick, so marking this as
solved.
Thanks,
--Ed
_
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Christopher Wensink wrote:
> I have a handful of Linux Servers, running Centos 6.10, and 6.8 with the
> main host running openvz w/ Centos 6.10 as the main OS. Two of the
> guests are running samba, sharing directories out to windows clients.
>
> I'm in t
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:39 AM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
> This is an archaic file which is equivalent to /etc/hosts and can be used
> by various network tools instead of DNS.
> https://linux-audit.com/the-purpose-of-etc-networks/
>
> Other than getent, this file seems to be little use in a
On 15/06/2020 15:53, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On 6/15/20 6:19 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Am 15.06.20 um 05:38 schrieb Strahil Nikolov via CentOS:
Working with different Linux Distributions makes the life harder.
So far I have found out that 'poweroff' & 'reboot' has the same
behaviour o
I have a handful of Linux Servers, running Centos 6.10, and 6.8 with the
main host running openvz w/ Centos 6.10 as the main OS. Two of the
guests are running samba, sharing directories out to windows clients.
I'm in the process of migrating servers over to vmware, using Centos
7.8. How can I de
On 6/15/20 6:19 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Am 15.06.20 um 05:38 schrieb Strahil Nikolov via CentOS:
Working with different Linux Distributions makes the life harder.
So far I have found out that 'poweroff' & 'reboot' has the same
behaviour on Linux/Unix/BSDs.
Yeah, poweroff seems
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 19:55, Jay Hart wrote:
> I am having some network connectivity issues that manifest itself through
> ping, wget, dnf, etc.
> The symptoms are intermittent ability to ping, was wget, or connect to
> repositories.
>
> Where this inquiry is going is: If your internal network i
Am 15.06.20 um 05:38 schrieb Strahil Nikolov via CentOS:
Working with different Linux Distributions makes the life harder.
So far I have found out that 'poweroff' & 'reboot' has the same behaviour on
Linux/Unix/BSDs.
Yeah, poweroff seems the appropriate command instead of halt.
Thanks for a
20 matches
Mail list logo
