On 08/07/2020 07:56 PM, H wrote:
> I have a dilemma: I have nextcloud running under user and group apache, as
> recommended by the installation. I now have to run some nextcloud commands
> but even as root I cannot su to user apache because "this account is
> currently not available". Is there a
I have a dilemma: I have nextcloud running under user and group apache, as
recommended by the installation. I now have to run some nextcloud commands but
even as root I cannot su to user apache because "this account is currently not
available". Is there a way around this? The commands must be ru
Hello dear CentOS community,
I'm writing on this mailing list because I'm discovering CentOS 8 after
several years of practice on CentOS 7.
One of my main concern about a distribution is Bug Fixes and Security
Fixes. For CentOS 7, all fixes where identified on CentOS-Announces
lists with CES
Hi,
Here's a list of all the booleans I tweaked on my server running CentOS 7:
$ sudo cat /etc/selinux/targeted/active/booleans.local
# This file is auto-generated by libsemanage
# Do not edit directly.
named_write_master_zones=0
httpd_can_sendmail=1
httpd_unified=1
ftpd_full_access=1
httpd_can_
Hi Alessandro,
Compared to Microsoft , both RH and SuSE are awesome.
You always need a patch management strategy with locked repos
(spacewalk/pulp) which can be tested on less important systems, prior
deployment on Prod.
Keep in mind that Secureboot is hard to deploy in Virtual Environm
Il 07/08/20 15:46, Stephen John Smoogen ha scritto:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 09:15, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Alessandro Baggi said:
you are right but is not UEFI a standard and it shouldn't work the
same on several vendors? I ask this because this patch broken all my
uefi workstati
Am 07.08.20 um 17:17 schrieb Alessandro Baggi:
Hi Johnny,
what is the current status of the notification tool for security updates
on C8? There are possibilities to get soon announces on ML for EL8?
Would be great have the tool working.
As I understand some kind of mapping must be imple
Il 07/08/20 14:53, Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
On 8/7/20 5:30 AM, Phil Perry wrote:
On 07/08/2020 10:01, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 8/7/20 3:46 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Le 07/08/2020 à 09:40, Alessandro Baggi a écrit :
Probably many users have not updated their machines between the bug
release a
Le 07/08/2020 à 11:01, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
>
> Microsoft, Debian, Ubuntu and others also had issues with this .. so if
> you are losing trust, you are losing it with all OS vendors WRT this issue.
>
> All I can say is .. this issue was the hardest thing I have been
> involved with since star
> On 8/7/20 5:30 AM, Phil Perry wrote:
>> On 07/08/2020 10:01, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 8/7/20 3:46 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Le 07/08/2020 à 09:40, Alessandro Baggi a écrit :
> Probably many users have not updated their machines between the bug
> release and
> the resolution (t
> Once upon a time, Alessandro Baggi said:
>> you are right but is not UEFI a standard and it shouldn't work the
>> same on several vendors? I ask this because this patch broken all my
>> uefi workstations.
>
> The great thing about standards is there's so many to choose from! Also
> relevant: ht
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 09:15, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Alessandro Baggi said:
> > you are right but is not UEFI a standard and it shouldn't work the
> > same on several vendors? I ask this because this patch broken all my
> > uefi workstations.
>
> The great thing about standards i
Once upon a time, Alessandro Baggi said:
> you are right but is not UEFI a standard and it shouldn't work the
> same on several vendors? I ask this because this patch broken all my
> uefi workstations.
The great thing about standards is there's so many to choose from! Also
relevant: https://xkcd
On 8/7/20 5:30 AM, Phil Perry wrote:
> On 07/08/2020 10:01, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 8/7/20 3:46 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>>> Le 07/08/2020 à 09:40, Alessandro Baggi a écrit :
Probably many users have not updated their machines between the bug
release and
the resolution (thanks to
On 07/08/2020 10:01, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 8/7/20 3:46 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Le 07/08/2020 à 09:40, Alessandro Baggi a écrit :
Probably many users have not updated their machines between the bug release and
the resolution (thanks to your fast apply in the weekend, thank you) and many
upda
Il 07/08/20 10:47, Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
On 8/7/20 2:40 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
Il 07/08/20 08:22, Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
"How on earth could this have passed Q & A ?"
Hi Johnny,
Niki's question is spread, legit, in the thoughts in many and many users
so don't see this as an attack
Il 07/08/20 10:46, Nicolas Kovacs ha scritto:
Le 07/08/2020 à 09:40, Alessandro Baggi a écrit :
Probably many users have not updated their machines between the bug release and
the resolution (thanks to your fast apply in the weekend, thank you) and many
update their centos machines on a 2 month
On 8/7/20 3:46 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 07/08/2020 à 09:40, Alessandro Baggi a écrit :
>> Probably many users have not updated their machines between the bug release
>> and
>> the resolution (thanks to your fast apply in the weekend, thank you) and many
>> update their centos machines on a 2
On 8/7/20 2:40 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>
> Il 07/08/20 08:22, Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
>>> "How on earth could this have passed Q & A ?"
>
> Hi Johnny,
> Niki's question is spread, legit, in the thoughts in many and many users
> so don't see this as an attack. Many and many users,though real
Le 07/08/2020 à 09:40, Alessandro Baggi a écrit :
> Probably many users have not updated their machines between the bug release
> and
> the resolution (thanks to your fast apply in the weekend, thank you) and many
> update their centos machines on a 2 months base (if not worst). I think also
> tha
Il 07/08/20 08:22, Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
"How on earth could this have passed Q & A ?"
Hi Johnny,
Niki's question is spread, legit, in the thoughts in many and many users
so don't see this as an attack. Many and many users,though really "if
this was tested before release" and I think th
21 matches
Mail list logo
