Simple question
did you try a centos live cd with a all tools to open the system?
Perhaps the easiest way when not trained every day restoring files.
Ralf
Von meinem iPad gesendet
> Am 26.11.2020 um 20:11 schrieb H :
>
> Running CentOS 7 I have a previously combined backup of a disk with three
On 11/26/2020 05:27 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> Am 26.11.20 um 20:10 schrieb H:
>> Running CentOS 7 I have a previously combined backup of a disk with three
>> partitions using dd. I now need to restore one single file from this backup
>> and after perusing the internet, specifically
>>
Am 26.11.20 um 20:10 schrieb H:
Running CentOS 7 I have a previously combined backup of a disk with three
partitions using dd. I now need to restore one single file from this backup and
after perusing the internet, specifically
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/31669/is-it-possible-to-m
Running CentOS 7 I have a previously combined backup of a disk with three
partitions using dd. I now need to restore one single file from this backup and
after perusing the internet, specifically
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/31669/is-it-possible-to-mount-a-gzip-compressed-dd-image-on
>
>
> I ran into an odd issue on CentOS 8, anyone seen this?
>
>
> When repos are configured to use baseurl instead of mirrorlist, the
> ansible dnf module fails.
>
> It is as if it is ignoring the baseurl configuration.
>
>
> #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$base
> Hi,
>
>
> I ran into an odd issue on CentOS 8, anyone seen this?
>
>
> When repos are configured to use baseurl instead of mirrorlist, the
> ansible dnf module fails.
>
> It is as if it is ignoring the baseurl configuration.
>
>
> #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch
Hi,
I ran into an odd issue on CentOS 8, anyone seen this?
When repos are configured to use baseurl instead of mirrorlist, the ansible dnf
module fails.
It is as if it is ignoring the baseurl configuration.
#mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=Ba
> On 11/24/20 8:20 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
>
>> Sure, and for large disks I even go further: don't put the whole disk
>> into
>> one RAID device but build multiple segments, like create 6 partitions of
>> same size on each disk and build six RAID1s out of it. So, if there is
>> an
>> issue on one d
On 11/24/20 8:20 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
Sure, and for large disks I even go further: don't put the whole disk into
one RAID device but build multiple segments, like create 6 partitions of
same size on each disk and build six RAID1s out of it. So, if there is an
issue on one disk in one segment,
9 matches
Mail list logo
