When I install Centos 7, I see an "alert!" message flash by, too fast
to read it. Is there a way to figure out what that message is/was
(after install) or make it wait so I can actually read it?
thanks,
Ron
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cento
On March 16, 2021 11:16:21 AM EDT, Michael Hennebry
wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Mar 2021, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
>
>> We need to ask the developers to make a re-spin that's about 5MB
>> smaller. And before someone suggests it, the 2010-vintage server I'm
>> trying to install CentOS on do
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
We need to ask the developers to make a re-spin that's about 5MB
smaller. And before someone suggests it, the 2010-vintage server I'm
trying to install CentOS on does not support booting from a thumb
drive, so that option is not avail
On 3/16/21 9:37 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Sure, no problem. I had a similar problem with a different version of
CentOS, 8.3, which is too large to fit on a dual-layer DVD.
I should have done the math before posting, sorry. Here's the math:
lowen@d10-lo-m6700:~$ dvd+rw-mediainfo /dev/sr0
INQUIRY:
On 3/15/21 5:04 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 16:26, Lamar Owen wrote:
Well, what's odd is that the actual upstream RHEL 7.9 DVD WILL fit on a
single-layer DVD. Just burned one.
Well I am batting 0 for 1000 today. I am clearly not a good resource at the
moment :). Tha
On 16/3/21 6:07 pm, Rob Kampen wrote:
On 16/03/21 4:24 pm, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
After setting up /etc/samba/smb.conf and running "testparm" in CentOS
7.9.2011, I have noticed that the list of parameters echoed back for
the [global] section do not match those in the smb.conf f
On 16/03/21 4:24 pm, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote:
After setting up /etc/samba/smb.conf and running "testparm" in CentOS
7.9.2011, I have noticed that the list of parameters echoed back for
the [global] section do not match those in the smb.conf file. Is this
normal?
[global] in /etc/
On 16/03/21 9:25 am, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 3/15/21 8:51 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Exactly that. Upstream Fedora and RHEL went to require dual density
around
Fedora 18, RHEL-7 because the amount of data was too much.
Well, what's odd is that the actual upstream RHEL 7.9 DVD WILL fit on
a s
8 matches
Mail list logo